Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

eccieuser9500 · 07-07-2019, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Apparently Little Mike has forgotten about Title 50 = STFU.

TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...11-title50.htm

eccieuser9500 · 07-07-2019, 12:03 PM

Fact Sheet U.S.C. Title 10, Title 22, and Title 50

The U.S.C. is expansive, intricate, and dynamic: laws are frequently reviewed, amended, or repealed as their necessity or interpretation is influenced by specific events. The result is a dense tome of legislation that is challenging to analyze. For this reason, the American Security Project has produced a brief examination of the three titles that govern US National Security and guide US foreign relations.

You can download the fact sheet here, or read it below:

U.S.C. Title 10, Title 22, And Title 50

dilbert firestorm · 07-07-2019, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

No! I do not know if Mueller withheld exculpatory evidence. So, No not at this time, but I'm not a lawyer.

dilbert..

Do you think a hostile foreign nation using cyberwarfare to interfere in American democratic processes during the 2016 General Election is a problem?

its not really a concern... none of our election apparatus (voting machines) is hooked to the internet. one should caution the database isn't compromised. I understand that some state election database is hooked to the internet. a couple were hacked or so I hear.

as far as proxy electioneering goes, it is not a concern either.

U.S. under Obama/Clinton tried to interfere in Russian's election with their election funded protest wave. also tried to interfere in Israels election in an effort to knock out pm bibi netanyu.

I do think russia's proxy electioneering was payback for U.S's interference in russia's election.

we do it to them, they do it to us. its a stupid game.

the only way to end this is by treaty.

lustylad · 07-07-2019, 01:39 PM

Some people have short memories. Or selective memories. Or no memories.

Back in 1996 we were instrumental in helping Boris Yeltsin win re-election in Russia. Slick Willy approved of the whole thing. And Time Magazine BRAGGED about it on the cover!

Here... read the entire article and learn! And maybe show a little historical perspective for a change!

https://ccisf.org/wp-content/uploads...1612201405.pdf

eccieuser9500 · 07-07-2019, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

we do it to them, they do it to us. its a stupid game.

the only way to end this is by treaty.

Thus I closed with the farse to be with you.

Jaxson66 · 07-09-2019, 10:54 AM

That new Freedom caucus lawyer for Gen. Flynn has now gotten her client charged as a co conspirator in his partners case.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...cutors-1403317

I B Hankering · 07-09-2019, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

That new Freedom caucus lawyer for Gen. Flynn has now gotten her client charged as a co conspirator in his partners case.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...cutors-1403317

Flynn will be exonerated. The government's case is "fruit of the poisonous tree" as will be revealed by Horowitz and Durham. Then there are the Brady violations to factor in.

"On June 28, Judge Anthony Trenga, who is presiding over the case against Kian, pressed prosecutors nearly half a dozen times to explain what laws were violated, regarding an op-ed that was published by the firm and the issue of lobbying: 'That’s what I’m having trouble understanding here,' the judge said, as reported by Politico. 'It’s a convoluted statute.'"

bambino · 07-09-2019, 11:39 AM

There’s been some rumblings that Meuller isn’t going to show up on the 17th.

eccieuser9500 · 07-09-2019, 12:05 PM

Then what good is a subpoena if Meuller and Mcgahn get to ignore the invitation?

Jaxson66 · 07-09-2019, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bambino

There’s been some rumblings that Meuller isn’t going to show up on the 17th.

By who, Sean Hannity. The Seth Rich conspiracy is being exposed as Russian military propaganda which millions swallowed hook, line and sinker. Anyone who believed that crap now will know the truth.

Mueller will be there, get the crying towel ready.

https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-the...100000831.html

bambino · 07-09-2019, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Then what good is a subpoena if Meuller and Mcgahn get to ignore the invitation?

Ask Nadler. He was instrumental in passing the new statutes concerning a special prosecutor after Clinton’s fiasco. It states that a special councils report can only be released to the AG. And nobody else. Barr said he would support Mueller if he chooses not to testify.

The_Waco_Kid · 07-09-2019, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bambino

Ask Nadler. He was instrumental in passing the new statutes concerning a special prosecutor after Clinton’s fiasco. It states that a special councils report can only be released to the AG. And nobody else. Barr said he would support Mueller if he chooses not to testify.

Oh the irony!! Fatass Nadless fucked himself in the ass 20 years ago and didn't even know it!

BAHHAHHAAAAAAAA

priceless!!!!!

The_Waco_Kid · 07-09-2019, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

By who, Sean Hannity. The Seth Rich conspiracy is being exposed as Russian military propaganda which millions swallowed hook, line and sinker. Anyone who believed that crap now will know the truth.

Mueller will be there, get the crying towel ready.

https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-the...100000831.html

didn't you cry enough after the Mueller nothing burger came out? want Trump to throw you a roll of Bounty for the 17th when Mueller's game begins to fall apart?

eccieuser9500 · 07-09-2019, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bambino

Ask Nadler. He was instrumental in passing the new statutes concerning a special prosecutor after Clinton’s fiasco. It states that a special councils report can only be released to the AG. And nobody else. Barr said he would support Mueller if he chooses not to testify.

Correct me if I'm wrong, and I know you will, but isn't there some semantic argument over Special Counsel AND Special Prosecutor?

I'm going to tune out of the surreal Washington same-old same-old.

I'll be too busy for the next twenty-four hours binging the first two seasons of that show nobody watches. It's so delightfully bawdy.

bambino · 07-09-2019, 06:24 PM

Ken Starr was an INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR, the new term is Special Counsel or prosecutor. That being said, the new statute, which Nadler fought for, says the Special Whatever is only obligated to give his report to the AG. None of it had to be public. Dems da rules now. But Barr was pummeled for being as transparent as he was. What will GoNadler do if Mueller stiffs him? Mueller knows he’s on shaky grounds. He doesn’t want to embarrass himself even more.

But hey, you’re an expert on googling corny memes. Google the statute for yourself. I’m not going to do it for you.