Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 370
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 262
sharkman29 250
George Spelvin 244
Top Posters
DallasRain70383
biomed160296
Yssup Rider59851
gman4452865
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47432
pyramider46370
bambino40283
CryptKicker37064
Mokoa36485
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35161
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-01-2019, 06:35 PM   #361
dilbert firestorm
Premium Access
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
There is a real possibility that impeaching Trump could blow up in the Democrat's feces.

can't wait to see who's right.

FTFY
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 06-01-2019, 07:57 PM   #362
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The parts that Team Mueller edited out more than indicate the bias of Team Mueller and their intent to smear Trump. Mueller's bullshit is simply hildebeest's bullshit rewarmed for hildebeest minion's to suckle on and swallow.
Don’t forget collusion isn’t a crime and proving conspiracy with that lame ass theory is ridiculous. Nunes needed a distraction to divert the Cult 45 members away from the fact the DOJ refused a court order.

In the immortal words of the self proclaimed stable genius “ we’ll see what happens “
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 06-01-2019, 08:03 PM   #363
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66 View Post
Don’t forget collusion isn’t a crime and proving conspiracy with that lame ass theory is ridiculous. Nunes needed a distraction to divert the Cult 45 members away from the fact the DOJ refused a court order.

In the immortal words of the self proclaimed stable genius “ we’ll see what happens “
It's hildebeest's dim-retard minions that are being distracted away from the facts -- it's been that way since 2016.

Where's Adam Shitty's ~proof~? But after two years of his lies, you still believe in him.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 06-01-2019, 08:08 PM   #364
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
What about the republican congressman from Michigan? He doesn't mean anything either, right? Why does Pelosi want to hear from Maghan? Are you afraid to hear about that "Stupid Sh*t" that Trump requested him to do?

There is a real possibility that Trump could be impeached.
A Republican group is hand-delivering special counsel Robert Mueller's report to every lawmaker in its party on the heels of his first public remarks on the two-year Russia investigation.

Republicans for the Rule of Law announced Thursday it will deliver a copy of the report with highlighted sections to Republicans in Congress.
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 06-01-2019, 08:24 PM   #365
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,210
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
Amash is as much as a Republican as Bernie Sanders is a Democrat. So it won’t happen.
You probably meant to write independent instead of democrat. Bernie is on the same page as AOC with their views on healthcare and "free college".

If impeachment is "off the table" then why bother with bringing in Maghan? Maghan is just one of the ten examples of obstruction in the report. If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify?

They may want to prove at least a couple of those examples, instead of just one. If they can impeachment just might happen.

You like to predict outcomes. Did you predict that Obama was going to beat Romney by 5 million votes?

Political consultant Dick Weiss of didn't so Fox fired him along with Sarah airhead Palin.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 06:36 AM   #366
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
...If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify? ...
Hold that thought until you get accused of something you didn't do!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 09:05 AM   #367
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 40,283
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
You probably meant to write independent instead of democrat. Bernie is on the same page as AOC with their views on healthcare and "free college".

If impeachment is "off the table" then why bother with bringing in Maghan? Maghan is just one of the ten examples of obstruction in the report. If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify?

They may want to prove at least a couple of those examples, instead of just one. If they can impeachment just might happen.

You like to predict outcomes. Did you predict that Obama was going to beat Romney by 5 million votes?

Political consultant Dick Weiss of didn't so Fox fired him along with Sarah airhead Palin.
In case you haven’t noticed, Sanders is running again as a DEMOCRAT, not an Independent. Amash has said he wouldn’t stand a chance of winning his district as an Independent. Now the he outed himself, I doubt he will win again. Magahn testified for 30 hours to Mueller. It’s in the report. The DOJ ruled no obstruction. As a legal matter, case closed.
bambino is online now   Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 10:53 AM   #368
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
The DOJ ruled no obstruction. As a legal matter, case closed.
Isn't that what Comey did right before the 2016 election re HillariousNoMore?

Perhaps I should have written .... "tried to do" instead of "did"!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 01:43 PM   #369
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

As I recall the Orange one was pissing and moaning Fake News

Volume 2/ pg 118
The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel

Overview
In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead. After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel. Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President's effort to have the Special Counsel removed. The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the ChiefofStaffpresent and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate. In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed.
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 03:18 PM   #370
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

"Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I [AG Barr] have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."

(NYT)
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 09:27 PM   #371
eccieuser9500
Valued Poster
 
eccieuser9500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,783
Encounters: 46
Default




Quote:
The historical record categorically refutes the idea that the American revolutionaries gave their new president an unspecified array of royal prerogatives. To the contrary, the presidency that leaps off the pages of the Founders’ debates, diaries, speeches, letters, poems, and essays was an instrument of the law of the land, subject to the law of the land, and both morally (?) and legally obliged to obey the law of the land.
















Dershowitz to prove we have a kaiser?
eccieuser9500 is offline   Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 09:36 PM   #372
eccieuser9500
Valued Poster
 
eccieuser9500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,783
Encounters: 46
Default












eccieuser9500 is offline   Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 11:03 PM   #373
Redhot1960
BANNED
 
Redhot1960's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 11, 2019
Location: United States
Posts: 3,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gfejunkie View Post
best post!

Redhot1960 is offline   Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 08:26 AM   #374
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500 View Post
They speak of trump’s attempt to have Maghan create a false document and Combover Caligula also instructed Prebius to have KT McFarland do the same.
KT McFarland refused to do so.

When CNN and others where reporting the story trump was screaming “ Fake News.
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 04:07 PM   #375
Hotrod511
Valued Poster
 
Hotrod511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 9, 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66 View Post
As I recall the Orange one was pissing and moaning Fake News

Volume 2/ pg 118
The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel

Overview
In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead. After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel. Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President's effort to have the Special Counsel removed. The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the ChiefofStaffpresent and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate. In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed.
This seems to be all you are doing
Hotrod511 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved