Workplace Shooting but not much hand wringing..

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Wh do you continually lie?

Ahhh ... I get it. You’re playing to your audience.

Why do you continually deny your restrictive gun controls couldn't stop this guy?


https://www.apnews.com/5f4aa698a6044002bfc4f39cc23fc4a3


Police: Aurora attacker used gun he shouldn’t have owned

he didn't get that gun at a gun shop, gun show or pawn shop. So where did he get it?

[Yssup Rider]

Where did I make any such denial?

You’re making shit up again TWK.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

A question to OP: I don’t see you terribly upset by this mass shooting. Are you OK with it?

Or is this thread just another way for you to use tragedy to snipe at fellow ECCIE posters?

I'm outraged by this shooting and I blame liberals for creating the America that frustrates so many people they feel the need to lash out in frustration.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

No actually they have not. Nor in Australia! Or anywhere!
When pure raw and unbiased numbers are looked at, no gun law has ever worked. NOT COUNTING SUICIDES! Nor should they be counted! Injuries and deaths actually increased! Other violent crimes sky rocketed as a result of citizens being disarmed and/or severly limited ! Knife and other sharp and blunt instrument injuries soared to unheard of numbers. Most of these cases were avoidable if the victims had their firearms! These numbers were high enough to off set the so called gun violence injuries significantly. All these gun laws ever accomplished was taking rights from good people and handicapping their rights to defend themselves. Putting their well being and personal safety in jeopardy. There are major efforts to at least restore some gun rights back to citizens that would qualify in several Countries. Ive fought this battle all my life! Its my eleventh commandment! Anyone who wants links? Go find 'em they are out there!
The second protects all the others and is the ultimate govt. assured check and balance! As it allows the citizens the right to bare arms!

You are correct. Fuck the Brits. Hail the Japs!

[rexdutchman]

Lets see 1) history of violence 2) should not have been able to buy gun 3) Gov failed to do well anything
Soo same old same old the MSM is running outa scare and deceive ideas And there to busy with Big T

[grean]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

A question to OP: I don’t see you terribly upset by this mass shooting. Are you OK with it?

Or is this thread just another way for you to use tragedy to snipe at fellow ECCIE posters?

Of course he's not okay with it. It's a tragedy. He's pissed off, just like me!

Yet the gun control pushers aren't raging about the fact that existing laws weren't enforced. They aren't enraged that the guy was a convicted felon and yet was able to pass a background check to buy a gun. They aren't livid that 5 people are dead because the police wrote a letter to the murderer asking him to turn in the gun he purchased instead of raiding his home in the midle of the night , like they did an innocent man, to take his gun.

They would rather make sure law abiding citizens are more afraid to look at a gun than learn how to use one tof defend themselves in these nightmare scenarios that just happen to be deadly real.

It's so absolutely insane, one can't help but be a bit sarcastic.

[Yssup Rider]

[oeb11]

Amen, Grean.

DPST ideology triumphs - no cogent response!!!!!

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Only a stupid person would perceive a statement of fact as a question. Haven't heard one word of comment from any leading dim-retards speculating on the political biases of the shooter. Where's Odumbo, hildebeest, Booker, Pelosi, etc. on this?

Where are your links proving your statement?
Duh, don't have any.

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

You think I accused liberals of approving of shootings? I'm accusing them of not showing their usual objections to gun crimes for political reasons, because they know this shooting is a great argument to arm law abiding citizens to protect themselves!!

Please reread my post!

I did answer the question.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by bamscram

Where are your links proving your statement?
Duh, don't have any.

I don't have to prove they didn't condemn a black man for shooting white people.

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I don't have to prove they didn't condemn a black man for shooting white people.

You and fred both stated liberals condone work place shootings, you said it you own it now prove it.


Ceawfishing won't help you.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by bamscram

You and fred both stated liberals condone work place shootings, you said it you own it now prove it.


Ceawfishing won't help you.

Pointing out that you can't understand a post as written isn't "ceawfishing" (sic), it's charity.

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Pointing out that you can't understand a post as written isn't "ceawfishing" (sic), it's charity.

Nice deflection, otherwise you got nothing as usual.

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by bamscram

You and fred both stated liberals condone work place shootings, you said it you own it now prove it.


Ceawfishing won't help you.

Sometimes if you listen to the TOTAL SILENCE of the media and libs, especially with this issue. They will not have to actually say it to prove it! Their silence is proof enough.. Total f'ing hypocrites. If races and/or genders fit the media's criteria their all over it! This one? Total silence! So whatever sells copy, they promote!