Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
excellent example of cultural appropriation! remember that when some libtard makes that claim about a white person. why does she want to "look white"??
they allow TS bio's you know .. i'm just sayin' ..
and since you ask, why does Obama continue to refer to his "wife" as Micheal? it can't all be the fault of a teleprompter ... why here he is without one ..
Freudian slip? can't keep it straight on the down low?
Tell me, what features does Michelle Obama have that makes her a man???
I'll wait.
Look, I get it. You grew up in the South, with idiotard parents who probably didn't let you go to school much. They taught you at home everything you need to know, which couldn't have been much (I mean, what can people with a 7th grade education teach anyone?). All of you are still mad about the Civil War, and think you're entitled to have things your way all the time.
Sorry, dude. But there's nothing I can do about all that.
So, back to my point. What makes the most gorgeous First Lady of all time so 'mannish'?? Go ahead and tell me, and don't hold back...kinda like your big brother does when your sister has on her size 54" Daisy Duke shorts walking around the house.
Tell me, what features does Michelle Obama have that makes her a man???
I'll wait.
Look, I get it. You grew up in the South, with idiotard parents who probably didn't let you go to school much. They taught you at home everything you need to know, which couldn't have been much (I mean, what can people with a 7th grade education teach anyone?). All of you are still mad about the Civil War, and think you're entitled to have things your way all the time.
actually my dad has a BA in Business Administration and a JD in Law. he's a retired senior executive for a major US company and he speaks Latin.
Sorry, dude. But there's nothing I can do about all that.
So, back to my point. What makes the most gorgeous First Lady of all time so 'mannish'?? Go ahead and tell me, and don't hold back...kinda like your big brother does when your sister has on her size 54" Daisy Duke shorts walking around the house.
i'm the older brother and i don't have a sister.
you mean this "gorgeous" ex-first lady?
you know .. the one who has "junk"?
why is this "man bitch" always grabbing her junk? real women don't do that.
hey, you had to ask, didn't ya?
i'd rather you explain why you changed your handle from "Rambro Creed" to "Randall Creed"?
What elephant-eared photographer would be stupid enough to even publish these kinds of pictures? They're a reflection of his/her work, and using delete-able images of high up people only makes him/her look like a shitbag photographer.
I know this because, I'm a great photographer and would never use pics that are this awful...unless I was working covertly for someone.
Epic fail that you have to use fake pics taken by a moron photographer.
What elephant-eared photographer would be stupid enough to even publish these kinds of pictures? They're a reflection of his/her work, and using delete-able images of high up people only makes him/her look like a shitbag photographer.
I know this because, I'm a great photographer and would never use pics that are this awful...unless I was working covertly for someone.
Epic fail that you have to use fake pics taken by a moron photographer.
are they? do you have the negatives to prove it? who says you are a great photographer .. i mean, besides yourself?
why are there many of these out there? by different press photographers? show me one who claims his/her original photo was doctored?
ColinFlaherty
JUL 5, 2018, 3:16:49 PMEDITED
Remember last year's biggest fairy tale? And how Trump supporters were roaming the country, attacking People of Colaahhh.
July 14, 2018
Recycling: Another environmental scam goes bust
By Colin Flaherty
Anyone who has ever been to a recycling plant is invariably surprised at how dirty and nasty America's favorite green activity really is. Trucks dump the material on a long conveyor belt, where a few dozen people pick through by hand what is supposed to be recyclable material but more and more often is just plain old dirty trash.
The recyclables used to be worth something more than bragging rights about liberal moral superiority. Plastic bottles, newspapers, and cardboard were just a few of the favorites you could ship to China by the ton and make a few bucks along the way. No more: Last year, the Chinese were happy to pay us $100 a ton for newsprint. Today, $5 a ton is the going rate.
Even that is disappearing: too many people are putting too much bad stuff in their green bins. Result: The pizza box stewing in a half-full can of cat food is now considered contaminated, and the Chinese do not want it at any price.
It doesn't take much to ruin a bin full of green dreams. When I was an investigative reporter in San Diego, trash cans were often the first item of business when trying to get the low-down on a miscreant. Many the late night I raided a full trash can as if it were a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
Lots of great stories there. If it was in their mailbox a few days ago, it's in the trash today. They even open it for you.
But dumpster-diving – and more conventional recycling – are not for the faint of heart: one bag of cat litter can ruin a whole lot of trash, or in this case, garbage that is supposed to be worth something. And recyclables with no value meet the same fate as their morally inferior equivalents: the newspapers and boxes and other stuff are hauled off to the landfill.
With the way newspapers are committing suicide, the newsprint problem just might take care of itself. Wouldn't that be pretty if it were true?
Until that happens, the people who write for newspapers will continue living in this utopian world of small green footprints and bulging green containers – with very few stopping to ask, "Hey, are we making or spending money to collect that green garbage?"
For many, it does not make a difference as long as the Sierra Club is happy.
The people who actually collect the trash in all its forms do not have that luxury. "There was a time a few years ago when it was cheaper to recycle. It's just not the case anymore," Christopher Shorter, director of public works for the city of Washington, told the AFP news agency. "It will be more and more expensive for us to recycle," he said.
Even the Los Angeles Times has figured it out: "Environmentally minded Californians love to recycle – but it's no longer doing any good," said the headline. And this is coming from a paper whose official policy is not to publish any letters to the editor that question global warming because everyone knows that it is a scientific fact.
July 14, 2018
Recycling: Another environmental scam goes bust
By Colin Flaherty
Anyone who has ever been to a recycling plant is invariably surprised at how dirty and nasty America's favorite green activity really is. Trucks dump the material on a long conveyor belt, where a few dozen people pick through by hand what is supposed to be recyclable material but more and more often is just plain old dirty trash.
The recyclables used to be worth something more than bragging rights about liberal moral superiority. Plastic bottles, newspapers, and cardboard were just a few of the favorites you could ship to China by the ton and make a few bucks along the way. No more: Last year, the Chinese were happy to pay us $100 a ton for newsprint. Today, $5 a ton is the going rate.
Even that is disappearing: too many people are putting too much bad stuff in their green bins. Result: The pizza box stewing in a half-full can of cat food is now considered contaminated, and the Chinese do not want it at any price.
It doesn't take much to ruin a bin full of green dreams. When I was an investigative reporter in San Diego, trash cans were often the first item of business when trying to get the low-down on a miscreant. Many the late night I raided a full trash can as if it were a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
Lots of great stories there. If it was in their mailbox a few days ago, it's in the trash today. They even open it for you.
But dumpster-diving – and more conventional recycling – are not for the faint of heart: one bag of cat litter can ruin a whole lot of trash, or in this case, garbage that is supposed to be worth something. And recyclables with no value meet the same fate as their morally inferior equivalents: the newspapers and boxes and other stuff are hauled off to the landfill.
With the way newspapers are committing suicide, the newsprint problem just might take care of itself. Wouldn't that be pretty if it were true?
Until that happens, the people who write for newspapers will continue living in this utopian world of small green footprints and bulging green containers – with very few stopping to ask, "Hey, are we making or spending money to collect that green garbage?"
For many, it does not make a difference as long as the Sierra Club is happy.
The people who actually collect the trash in all its forms do not have that luxury. "There was a time a few years ago when it was cheaper to recycle. It's just not the case anymore," Christopher Shorter, director of public works for the city of Washington, told the AFP news agency. "It will be more and more expensive for us to recycle," he said.
Even the Los Angeles Times has figured it out: "Environmentally minded Californians love to recycle – but it's no longer doing any good," said the headline. And this is coming from a paper whose official policy is not to publish any letters to the editor that question global warming because everyone knows that it is a scientific fact.
Just like recycling.
assup recycles his poop. he shoves it back up his ass.
