Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Be mindful of the "counter-intelligence" aspects of this operation ... creating the illusion that the Trump campaign was engaging in "dirty tricks" while sopping up on the Clinton/DNC money! The Russians had already invested a lot in the Clinton Administration of the Future.
|
The Pro-Trump crowd should be cautious in embracing the "factual" allegations about the Russians at face value and recognize the "motivation" behind the Russians engaging in Anti-HillariousNoMore activities since as I mentioned the Russians already had serious money flowing toward the Clintons and had already made a favorable commercial purchase in the U.S. with the approval of the Pro-HillariousNoMore crowd, ala Obaminable. Not to mention that Obaminable was withholding any effort to thwart the Russian activities.
Why would the Russians attempt to kill the goose that had been laying golden eggs for them, which included standing down while the Russians invaded Europe, in the "hope" they could do business with Trump, who was already talking about increasing the military and fortifying the perimeter of the U.S. Putin is smarter than that and he's an intelligence operative! "Bird in the hand" comes to mind.
When one peels back the bullshit the Russians did little that would have changed the outcome of the elections and almost intentionally focused their "campaign" activities in venues that they could not possibly affect in a way that would undermine HillariousNoMore. The pundits would have to first "assume' the Russians are not "very smart" and are not "sufficiently sophisticated" to affect elections. Is that a valid assumption?
