Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 262
sharkman29 250
George Spelvin 245
Top Posters
DallasRain70403
biomed160442
Yssup Rider59883
gman4452907
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47494
pyramider46370
bambino40301
CryptKicker37075
Mokoa36485
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35287
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-03-2013, 12:02 AM   #1
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default How corporate tax credits got in the 'cliff' deal

Yeah. Obama is on your side. If you're GE, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, etc.

From the article, cited below:

Former Sens. John Breaux, D-La., and Trent Lott, R-Miss., a pair of rainmaker lobbyists, pleaded for extensions on behalf of a powerful lineup of clients.

General Electric and Citigroup, for instance, hired Breaux and Lott to extend a tax provision that allows multinational corporations to defer U.S. taxes by moving profits into offshore financial subsidiaries. This provision -- known as the "active financing exception" -- is the main tool GE uses to avoid nearly all U.S. corporate income tax.

Liquor giant Diageo also retained Breaux and Lott to win extensions on two provisions benefitting rum-making in Puerto Rico.

The K Street firm Capitol Tax Partners, led by Treasury Department alumni from the Clinton administration, represented an even more impressive list of tax clients, who paid CTP more than $1.68 million in the third quarter.

Besides financial clients like Citi, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, CTP represented green energy companies like GE and the American Wind Energy Association. These companies won extension and expansion of the production tax credit for wind energy.

Hollywood hired CTP, too: The Motion Picture Association of America won an extension on tax credits for film production.

After packing 50 tax credit extensions into the bill, the committee voted 19 to 5 to pass it. But then it stalled. The Senate left for the conventions and the fall campaign. Meanwhile, House Republicans signaled resistance to some of the extensions -- especially for green energy.

One lobbyist said he didn't worry too much about the Baucus bill because "we knew the House wasn't going to pass it." But another lobbyist, who had worked on the Puerto Rico issues, said he saw Baucus' bill as an important starting point that "set the parameters" of a future fight with House Republicans.

But there never was a fight. Baucus' bill sat ignored until last week, when the White House sat down with Senate Republicans to craft a deal averting the fiscal cliff.

A Republican Senate aide familiar with the cliff negotiations tells me the White House wanted permanent extensions of a whole slew of corporate tax credits. When Senate Republicans said no, "the White House insisted that the exact language" of the Baucus bill be included in the fiscal cliff deal. "They were absolutely insistent," another aide tells me. (The White House did not return requests for comment.)


When will you people learn that Obama (and the Republicans) are playing you for patsies? They don't give a damn about you. They care about their owners. Citibank, Goldman Sachs, GE, et. al.

More on this treason, here: http://washingtonexaminer.com/tim-ca...7#.UOUrZG9QUTC
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 12:12 AM   #2
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Can you believe this? After complaining throughout the campaign about "offshore money" being hidden to avoid taxes, President Obama INSISTS that a provision be included in the "cliff" deal that allows GE TO DO JUST THAT! This allows GE to pay essentially ZERO in US taxes!

C'mon libs! Explain this one away.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 12:16 AM   #3
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

its been around for a long time, repealed in 1986, Kerry tried to shut it down in 07 ... guess what? I dont remember specifics but I'd guess the republicans did everything in their power to keep it alive including swift boat tactics .. snick

http://ataxingmatter.blogs.com/tax/2..._financin.html
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 12:23 AM   #4
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Can you believe this? After complaining throughout the campaign about "offshore money" being hidden to avoid taxes, President Obama INSISTS that a provision be included in the "cliff" deal that allows GE TO DO JUST THAT! This allows GE to pay essentially ZERO in US taxes!

C'mon libs! Explain this one away.

difference being GE is a corp, Romney is an individual
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 01:25 AM   #5
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

I knew the Obamaton would come up with some justification.

It just proves that some people will defend ANYTHING Obama does. Truly brainwashed. Look up "Stockholm Syndrome."
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 03:59 AM   #6
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

You act like this is a new thing .Was just curious when any legislation comes out that you don't care for it's Obama's fault.Lawmakers make and pass legislation not the President.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 08:29 AM   #7
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
You act like this is a new thing .Was just curious when any legislation comes out that you don't care for it's Obama's fault.Lawmakers make and pass legislation not the President.
COG forgets how the process works. If Obama does not like a bill, he can veto it, that is all. He can not write nor pass it!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 08:41 AM   #8
Laz
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 14, 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,280
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
COG forgets how the process works. If Obama does not like a bill, he can veto it, that is all. He can not write nor pass it!
But Obama can insist on things to be included or he will veto it. From what I heard Obama is the one that insisted the sequester delay be included. He could have done the same for other provisions. The way the idiots follow the party line in DC there is little he can't do.
Laz is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 09:00 AM   #9
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz View Post
But Obama can insist on things to be included or he will veto it. From what I heard Obama is the one that insisted the sequester delay be included. He could have done the same for other provisions. The way the idiots follow the party line in DC there is little he can't do.
They can make him veto it. Do you think he would veto it because GE did not get a tax break?

The GOP sounds like they want to blame fucking a fat chick , on the fat chick. They did not have to do this. They are using Obama for cover. Obama was not going to veto this bill because of any damn tax breaks, you know that and I know that...it is our Tea Wacks that do not realize that!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 10:21 AM   #10
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Like I said, the Obamatons will defend ANYTHING Obama does, no matter how corrupt or stupid.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 10:30 AM   #11
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Like I said, the Obamatons will defend ANYTHING Obama does, no matter how corrupt or stupid.
You want me to believe the WH made congress do this?
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 10:34 AM   #12
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

You think that doesn't happen? You are an idiot.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 11:48 AM   #13
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
You think that doesn't happen? You are an idiot.

you think when someone makes you look like a moron theyre defending Obie ... but youre a moron so thats expected from you.
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 11:56 AM   #14
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

So, are you saying Obama didn't want to give a huge tax break to GE? That the Congress forced it on him? Even though the administration insisted that it be included in the "cliff" deal?

And then you call me a moron?

That's why this place is so funny!

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 12:24 PM   #15
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
So, are you saying Obama didn't want to give a huge tax break to GE? That the Congress forced it on him? Even though the administration insisted that it be included in the "cliff" deal?

And then you call me a moron?

That's why this place is so funny!



LMAO ... I didnt say any of that ... I merely pointed out this Obama travesty you bring up has been around for decades so you say Im defending Obie ... you whined about offshore taxes being a big deal during the campaign, and I had to remind you what the difference was between Romney and GE

yeah, youre a freakin moron
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved