Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

gnadfly · 02-18-2019, 10:01 AM

Did McCabe ever say why "they" wanted to overthrow the President?

Specifically, was there an act or series of acts by President Trump that compelled to consider treason?

Other than Rosenstein did he name names?

Thanks.

LexusLover · 02-18-2019, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Did McCabe ever say why "they" wanted to overthrow the President?

Specifically, was there an act or series of acts by President Trump that compelled to consider treason?

Other than Rosenstein did he name names?

Thanks.

Actually, that would be difficult to identify or quantify, primarily because the "conspiracy" began BEFORE Trump was elected TO DO ANY "ACTS" by a President Trump and the continued effort morphed into the post-election period after the tears dried up and the wailing subsided, not to mention the hangovers dissipated.

Please don't forget that BEFORE the election the "collusion" had to do with the Democrats, specifically the Clinton Campaign, working with the Russians to get dirt on Trump that has turned out to be false, but used nonetheless. All this post-election bullshit is just to mask the real pre-election collusion.

As is typical of criminals when their "plan" doesn't bear fruit and they get caught red-handed they start pointing fingers at "police brutality" and "social injustice" to avoid the inevitable consequences.

It's basic kindergarten playground behavior on their part. The press are merely ignorant, biased pawns.

WTF · 02-18-2019, 10:15 AM

Could we merge this woth the rest of the don trump dock sucking threads?

What ever is done please do not merge it into a sane legal analysis thread

gnadfly · 02-18-2019, 10:19 AM

Treason is a very serious charge with death penalty implications.

What concerns me is since even Strzok said "there's no there there" then how was this justified? Comey's dismissal as a triggering event would be ludicrous because even the Dims wanted him gone too. Two years of Russian hoax isn't a decent motivator as they would of found prima facia evidence years ago.

The only conclusion I can come to given no significant event or pattern of behavior means that it's very likely a cover up on Obama's/Hillary's part. The "by the book" comment pretty much confirms it.

Did anyone see this episode?

bambino · 02-18-2019, 10:24 AM

Trump, according to McCabe, called McCabes wife a loser.

Yssup Rider · 02-18-2019, 10:27 AM

Last time CBS 60 Minutes aired an allegedly fake story about a POTUS, it cost Dan Rather his job.

This story/interview are easily more damning.

I do not believe CBS would make the same mistake twice.

I believe McCabe. And the behaviors he described fit virtually EVERY report by friend and foe alike.

McCabe got fucked by a vindictive dictator wannabe.

Payback is a bitch.

WTF · 02-18-2019, 10:30 AM

This thread is no there, there.

bambino · 02-18-2019, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Last time CBS 60 Minutes aired an allegedly fake story about a POTUS, it cost Dan Rather his job.

This story/interview are easily more damning.

I do not believe CBS would make the same mistake twice.

I believe McCabe. And the behaviors he described fit virtually EVERY report by friend and foe alike.

McCabe got fucked by a vindictive dictator wannabe.

Payback is a bitch.

The IG requested a criminal referral on McCabe. McCabes firing was recommended by his peers at the FBI. If Trump fucked McCabe, why did he interview with Trump for Comeys job? Yada Yada Yada.

dilbert firestorm · 02-18-2019, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

Could we merge this woth the rest of the don trump dock sucking threads?

What ever is done please do not merge it into a sane legal analysis thread

which anti trump threads? theres too many anti-trump threads here.... merge all of em???

you and another peep has been asking for a merger.

dilbert firestorm · 02-18-2019, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Last time CBS 60 Minutes aired an allegedly fake story about a POTUS, it cost Dan Rather his job.

This story/interview are easily more damning.

I do not believe CBS would make the same mistake twice.

I believe McCabe. And the behaviors he described fit virtually EVERY report by friend and foe alike.

McCabe got fucked by a vindictive dictator wannabe.

Payback is a bitch.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bambino

The IG requested a criminal referral on McCabe. McCabes firing was recommended by his peers at the FBI. If Trump fucked McCabe, why did he interview with Trump for Comeys job? Yada Yada Yada.

McCabe got fired for "lack of candor" which means he lied his ass off on what actually happened in his work space.

Jackie S · 02-18-2019, 11:10 AM

McCabe did all of these acts for one reason. All of "polls" showed that having the 2016 election was simply a formality, everyone knew Hillary was going to be POTUS.

When President Trump won, some cried, some wailed, some curled up into the fetal position, and some, like McCabe and his cronies decided to make things right, in their eyes.

The only problem? You are secretly opening an investigation on the duly elected President of the United States with one intention, his removal from office.

This is getting close to Sedition.

oeb11 · 02-18-2019, 11:13 AM

Thank You - JS

gnadfly · 02-18-2019, 12:50 PM

Here's most of the interview. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/andrew-...on-2019-02-17/

It seems other than Comey, McCabe doesn't name names.

The article starts by calling McCabe a Republican but his wife, who got a lot of money from the Clintons, ran for state senate as a Democrat.

Keep in mind that CBS news is run by David Rhodes, the brother of former deputy national security adviser for strategic communications for President Barack Obama, Ben Rhodes.

McCabe didn't have any evidence to open the two investigations against President Trump other than what they claim President Trump said in a meeting or two. No evidence.

It was always a witch hunt. Elements of the swamp protecting itself.

WTF · 02-18-2019, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackie S

McCabe did all of these acts for one reason. All of "polls" showed that having the 2016 election was simply a formality, everyone knew Hillary was going to be POTUS.

When President Trump won, some cried, some wailed, some curled up into the fetal position, and some, like McCabe and his cronies decided to make things right, in their eyes.

The only problem? You are secretly opening an investigation on the duly elected President of the United States with one intention, his removal from office.

This is getting close to Sedition.

Bullshit....had they not discussed it would have been a dereliction of Duty.

The FBI investigated both Trump and Clinton. Trump would have never gotten to where it was had the sob kept his mouth shut and not adked about Flynn and the fired Comney ...
you and others rage over this is misplaced. It should be directed at Trump.

Yssup Rider · 02-18-2019, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackie S

McCabe did all of these acts for one reason. All of "polls" showed that having the 2016 election was simply a formality, everyone knew Hillary was going to be POTUS.

When President Trump won, some cried, some wailed, some curled up into the fetal position, and some, like McCabe and his cronies decided to make things right, in their eyes.

The only problem? You are secretly opening an investigation on the duly elected President of the United States with one intention, his removal from office.

This is getting close to Sedition.

Not as close as Trump is to Treason.

How likely is either, really?