Main Menu |
|
Most Favorited Images |
|
Recently Uploaded Images |
|
Most Liked Images |
|
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
645 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
398 |
| Jon Bon |
385 |
| Harley Diablo |
370 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| Starscream66 |
262 |
| sharkman29 |
250 |
| George Spelvin |
244 |
|
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 70385 | | biomed1 | 60299 | | Yssup Rider | 59854 | | gman44 | 52869 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | WTF | 48267 | | offshoredrilling | 47437 | | pyramider | 46370 | | bambino | 40287 | | CryptKicker | 37064 | | Mokoa | 36485 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 | | The_Waco_Kid | 35162 | | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
09-25-2011, 10:50 AM
|
#1
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 16, 2011
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,969
|
Make all information Available ?
If your moving NCNS reviews to coed, why not allow providers to see ros for ncns. If you look at Mercianna ncns, she is responding to blank space without knowing the full facts.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post |
|
09-25-2011, 02:55 PM
|
#2
|
|
Ambassador
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: La Costa Rica
Posts: 8,511
|
Interesting idea, but that would still require moving private info to public view, which should require OP's approval.
Huck
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
09-25-2011, 03:19 PM
|
#3
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 17, 2010
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 6,719
|
But, as it was never suppose to be a Review, then thre never should have been any ROS to begain with. It is an issue staff/owners will have to discuss
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post |
|
09-25-2011, 04:41 PM
|
#4
|
|
Schrodinger's cat search
Join Date: Jan 7, 2010
Location: North Texas
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba3452
But, as it was never suppose to be a Review, then thre never should have been any ROS to begain with. It is an issue staff/owners will have to discuss
|
True, but any posting could still have private info. Since the OP but the info in the ROS area, I would think private tags would be implied. Just an opinion.
I do agree the posting in question is pretty useless since one of the parties in question cannot read on respond to the ROS info. I do think the OP should re-post the ROS private info on the NC/NS posting if he truly wants to share this info with the provider in question. It should be his call to publicize his ROS.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
09-28-2011, 08:45 AM
|
#5
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 16, 2011
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,969
|
what was the final decision ?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
09-28-2011, 09:02 AM
|
#6
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 17, 2010
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 6,719
|
Sometimes the wheels turn slowly Thatdude.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
09-28-2011, 09:35 AM
|
#7
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: Coventry
Posts: 5,947
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba3452
But, as it was never suppose to be a Review, then thre never should have been any ROS to begain with. It is an issue staff/owners will have to discuss
|
IF the person who is posting a NC/NS issue uses the Review template by mistake OR design, sucks to be them and the penalty should be to convert it to a new thread format by removing the tags for ROS completely so the provider can fairly read and respond if needed.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
09-28-2011, 11:01 PM
|
#8
|
|
Account Disabled
|
If a review is mistakenly posted, and moved to Coed, wouldn't it make sense to remove that review from said provider's profile? It really does put a damper on things...
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
09-29-2011, 08:52 AM
|
#9
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 31, 2009
Location: In my mind
Posts: 11,621
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alice Ayres
If a review is mistakenly posted, and moved to Coed, wouldn't it make sense to remove that review from said provider's profile? It really does put a damper on things...
|
Actually Alice you are correct, we generally assign no show reviews to a NSNC profile as has now happened with yours.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
09-29-2011, 12:31 PM
|
#10
|
|
Account Disabled
|
GREATLY APPRECIATED THANK YOU!!!!!
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
10-05-2011, 10:37 AM
|
#11
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 26, 2009
Posts: 247
|
Reviews NS/NC
Ok so how am I suppose to know when I look at reviews of a provider if she has NCNS??? It seems it should be on the reviews and then moved to Coed.
I sure want to be able to look at a provider's reviews and know that she had a NCNS.
So, should a more detail be put into a NCNS review so that it get there?? This just seems to let bad business practices go unnoticed.
How does that help the community?? Also, is it fair equally to both Hobbyists and Providers??
Please let me know. Thanks.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
10-05-2011, 12:49 PM
|
#12
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 21, 2009
Location: Happyville
Posts: 11,060
|
Alerts aren't linked to providers names either. Do a simple search of her name in CO-ED, reviews and alerts. Unless of course you are just posting this for other reasons, you know better.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
10-14-2011, 10:43 AM
|
#13
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 16, 2011
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,969
|
Wow do the wheels roll this slowly.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
10-29-2011, 03:27 PM
|
#14
|
|
Ambassador
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: La Costa Rica
Posts: 8,511
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thatdude
Wow do the wheels roll this slowly.
|
There was no promise that an announcement would be made here. If there is no need for a change, there is nothing to announce.
Huck
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-02-2011, 05:48 AM
|
#15
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Location: North Texas
Posts: 584
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba3452
But, as it was never suppose to be a Review, then thre never should have been any ROS to begain with. It is an issue staff/owners will have to discuss
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by urhuckleberry
There was no promise that an announcement would be made here. If there is no need for a change, there is nothing to announce.
Huck
|
I respectfully disagree. Assuming the owners/staff care about good customer relations (something that is apparent on P411, but less apparent here), when a "Super Moderator" states the "the staff/owners will have to discuss", the board users can conclude: - The staff/owners looked into it and decided to make a change
- The staff/owners decided not to make a change
- It is still pending a staff/owner review
NOT saying anything implys the latter. But to have decided not to make a change, and then deciding to keep it from the membership would be an additional indication of poor customer relations, disrespect, arrogance, or all three.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
|
Find Ladies |
|
Hot Women |
|
