Main Menu |
|
Most Favorited Images |
|
Recently Uploaded Images |
|
Most Liked Images |
|
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
645 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
398 |
| Jon Bon |
385 |
| Harley Diablo |
370 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| Starscream66 |
262 |
| sharkman29 |
250 |
| George Spelvin |
244 |
|
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 70373 | | biomed1 | 60247 | | Yssup Rider | 59828 | | gman44 | 52859 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | WTF | 48267 | | offshoredrilling | 47416 | | pyramider | 46370 | | bambino | 40270 | | CryptKicker | 37060 | | Mokoa | 36482 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 | | The_Waco_Kid | 35112 | | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
11-19-2019, 12:29 PM
|
#31
|
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,112
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
you guys keep saying powerful, bombshell, etc.. I don't read or hear any of that. well, except when I turn to FOX, their narrators say that. nobody else.
|
just about every article i see on Yahoo claims ""Bombshell" and "Powerful Message" over yet another twit testifying or making some statement about Trump.
it's to the point now where they've worn it out.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post |
|
11-19-2019, 12:34 PM
|
#32
|
|
Off clock with a Cowgirl
Join Date: Oct 19, 2013
Location: West Kansas
Posts: 30,148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
just about every article i see on Yahoo claims ""Bombshell" and "Powerful Message" .... to the point now where they've worn it out.
|
And none of which are bombshells or powerful msgs.
Every single thing is "I heard someone else say something".
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-19-2019, 12:37 PM
|
#33
|
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
just about every article i see on Yahoo claims ""Bombshell" and "Powerful Message" over yet another twit testifying or making some statement about Trump.
it's to the point now where they've worn it out.
|
I don't read Yahoo. I wish "news" people would keep adjectives to themselves. and other spin. almost every time I turn on CNN or MSNBC (less so with FOX), they run a banner headline, "breaking" news.. "Source: Republicans nervous", or "Committee Members concerned", shit like that. what "Source"? which Republicans? and how do you know what they FEEL?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-19-2019, 12:39 PM
|
#34
|
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
Every single thing is "I heard someone else say something".
|
there is getting to be too much of that. last week, I got it to an extent. let's have some first-hand meat for the Stove, if there is any.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-19-2019, 03:10 PM
|
#35
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
|
CT - I agree entirely with your above two posts.
The adam schiff show is all about "how did that make you feel - that you heard fourth hand from an unidentified source??"
schiff hs been playing Joe McCarthy with "evidence in hand" since he assumed the chair - and divulged none.
Time to pony up the real stuff on Trump - or go back to kalifornia and tend nancy's lawn.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-19-2019, 07:36 PM
|
#36
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
dems are trying to replay the nixon impeachment hearing which had wall to wall media coverage as we're seeing with the trump impeachment hearings.
Clinton didn't have that type of media coverage. lucky him.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-20-2019, 11:46 AM
|
#37
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 40,270
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
dems are trying to replay the nixon impeachment hearing which had wall to wall media coverage as we're seeing with the trump impeachment hearings.
Clinton didn't have that type of media coverage. lucky him.
|
CBS dropped it yesterday.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-20-2019, 12:21 PM
|
#38
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
|
Stupid question...impeachment votes have to be public.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-20-2019, 12:30 PM
|
#39
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Stupid question...impeachment votes have to be public.
|
No they don't.
Can't you read?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-20-2019, 09:38 PM
|
#40
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Stupid question...impeachment votes have to be public.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
No they don't.
Can't you read?
|
he's right for once.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-20-2019, 09:39 PM
|
#41
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
dems are trying to replay the nixon impeachment hearing which had wall to wall media coverage as we're seeing with the trump impeachment hearings.
Clinton didn't have that type of media coverage. lucky him.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
CBS dropped it yesterday.
|
did they? well, shouldn't be too surprising. its not a ratings hit. lol.
bet the viewers are complaining about not seeing their favorite soaps or game shows.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-20-2019, 10:12 PM
|
#42
|
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,112
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
there is getting to be too much of that. last week, I got it to an extent. let's have some first-hand meat for the Stove, if there is any.
|
Vindman already testified. he heard the call. what did he say? "i thinck orange man bad".
"i disagree with orange man". "orange man not listen to me so impeach orange man"
BAHHAHAAAAAA
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post |
|
11-20-2019, 11:29 PM
|
#43
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
|
I think the idiot is conflating the House vote with the Senate vote.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-20-2019, 11:40 PM
|
#44
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,767
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
I think the idiot is conflating the House vote with the Senate vote.
|
Maybe WTF should have titled this thread:
Will Mitch fuck him with a secret removal vote?
He will be impeached. But if the removal/conviction votes were secret, he could be removed. If the Senate Republicans weren't such pussies beholden to his coattails.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
11-21-2019, 02:24 AM
|
#45
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 24, 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
Maybe WTF should have titled this thread:
Will Mitch fuck him with a secret removal vote?
He will be impeached. But if the removal/conviction votes were secret, he could be removed. If the Senate Republicans weren't such pussies beholden to his coattails.
|
Now that's funny.
It boils down to, if the vote is public the Senators are forced to evaluate and vote on the (lack of) evidence to impeach, which gives Trump the vote to not remove. If the vote is private, they can ignore the (lack of) evidence and vote on their feelings toward Trump.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
|
Find Ladies |
|
Hot Women |
|
