Old Joe

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by bambino

He kept referring to the ATF as the AFT. What a tool. But Hunter broke several federal laws obtaining a firearm. His sister in law, the widow of his brother, also broke a federal law by disposing his firearm in a garbage can. I guess she couldn’t get enough of Biden cock. The Bidens are one big shit show.

Biden answered “no” in response to the question “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?” as part of the background check.

Huge law he broke there, like he is the first one to ever say that they had never used drugs.

You make it sound like he was a convicted felon that got ahold of a gun.

Maybe at the time he got the gun he wasn't using. Can't say not addicted because once addicted you always are in recovery.

No indictments, no crime, fake news for trumptard consumption.

[winn dixie]

Very slanted and wrong view! Oh so sorry!

[royamcr]

Truth hurts the trumptard spirit.

[bambino]

Joey Bribes had to go along with this fake Presidency to keep him and Hunter out of jail.


https://api.parler.com/l/mjzKb

[rexdutchman]

Puddin and chief used to be lock them up joey an PS 1994 weapons band he's saying was sooo great was a failure crime went up ,
Heres a idea hold criminals responsible ?

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by bambino

Joey Bribes had to go along with this fake Presidency to keep him and Hunter out of jail.


https://api.parler.com/l/mjzKb

Nobody trumps don the con.

[luv2eatvag32]

It’s not possible because it’s all unconstitutional even the laws on the books already.

“Shall not be infringed”. It’s pretty clear

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by luv2eatvag32

It’s not possible because it’s all unconstitutional even the laws on the books already.

“Shall not be infringed”. It’s pretty clear

I hear you

biden however says the bill of rights aren't absolute, I guess that certainly means, for him, the 10th for sure

when he rolled out his executive order on gun control, here's what he said

"No amendment, no amendment to the Constitution is absolute," he said. "You can’t yell 'fire' in a crowded movie theater — recall a freedom of speech. From the very beginning, you couldn’t own any weapon you wanted to own. From the very beginning that the Second Amendment existed, certain people weren’t allowed to have weapons."

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

HF, I am not reading your long winded post, but I did read the 1st paragraph. I am not sure what part of I don't listen to talking heads that you don't get. Just show me the news in an objective manner and I'll form my own opinion. I don't need to listen to a talking head to get their biased opinions whether they are left or right. Again, if you don't understand that, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

I'm not telling you not to watch FOX. Why would I even care?



Yes, why would you take the time to tell me you wouldn't watch Tucker? There had to be a reason. And since you don't care about anything that doesn't affect you personally, I think you once said and only interested in objective news, what the hell are you doing on a board full of subjective opinions? You are listening to "talking heads" every time you log on to this site.



I'm just telling you my viewpoint on the news. It's all relative what people enjoy watching. Just watch what you want. I thought that was the point of having a TV and a remote. It's not that serious.

Kinda my whole point. NOBODY but Tucker is going to tell you that news. And again, if you knew nothing about who the new head of the ATF is, then you are by all logic, un-informed on that topic. Not saying you must be informed or interested in that topic. Being a gun advocat, I thought you might. My mistake.



There is no such thing as purely objective news. Deciding what to put in a 30 minute, one hour broadcast or article is subjective. What one chooses to leave out is as important and can tell you a lot about a person, group, corporation, as what one chooses to tell.


If you think there is in this day and age, purely objective news, you are kidding yourself. That died with Walter Cronkite.


But I'll ask anyway. Who today is a committed journalist without bias, who never injects any personal belief on air or print? I'll start watching or reading immediately.

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by GastonGlock

More importantly, A lot of people who commit mass shootings know the consequences and just don't care. The vast majority of them don't plan on being taken alive. How do you punish that effectively that it curbs the behavior?

The answer to that has often been discussed. They even made a movie about it call "Minority Report" where "pre-cogs" would alert authorities to people who were "about to commit a crime".

Minority Report

opens with a montage of visions from a trio of “pre-cogs”: individuals who have the ability to see into the future, predicting murders before they

happen

. Their forecasts alert the PreCrime division to arrest a man who's about to kill his wife and her lover.

I doubt we'll ever have that kind of ability but what we do have right now, are data bases filled with the names of gang members. Should we be surprised when a member of a known violent gang, commits a violent crime? I'm a fan of the "broken windows theory".

The

broken windows theory

is a criminological

theory

that states that visible signs of crime, anti-social behavior, and civil disorder create an urban environment that encourages further crime and disorder, including serious crimes.

So if I were running law enforcement in this country, I would concentrate all my efforts, to keeping track of those we are very sure will offend and just maybe we get there before they do but OH, NO, we can't have that because that would be "profiling" and we can't just go around profiling people who have outwardly told us of their ant-social behavior now can we.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

I hear you

biden however says the bill of rights aren't absolute, I guess that certainly means, for him, the 10th for sure

when he rolled out his executive order on gun control, here's what he said

"No amendment, no amendment to the Constitution is absolute," he said. "You can’t yell 'fire' in a crowded movie theater — recall a freedom of speech. From the very beginning, you couldn’t own any weapon you wanted to own. From the very beginning that the Second Amendment existed, certain people weren’t allowed to have weapons."

Biden doesn't really understand the Constitution. The Constitution and all of it's Amendments are stipulation for Government to adhere too, not the people. So yes the Second Amendment is absolute for Government to abide by. Technically Biden should be on his way to impeachment.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Biden doesn't really understand the Constitution. The Constitution and all of it's Amendments are stipulation for Government to adhere too, not the people. So yes the Second Amendment is absolute for Government to abide by. Technically Biden should be on his way to impeachment.

Maybe Jim Crow Joe will repeal the 13th amendment!!!!

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Biden answered “no” in response to the question “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?” as part of the background check.

Huge law he broke there, like he is the first one to ever say that they had never used drugs.

You make it sound like he was a convicted felon that got ahold of a gun.

Maybe at the time he got the gun he wasn't using. Can't say not addicted because once addicted you always are in recovery.

No indictments, no crime, fake news for trumptard consumption.

The relevant question would be, has anybody ever been prosecuted and found guilty and sentenced to jail for doing just that. If the answer is yes, that begs the question of Why Hunter should be exempt from just such a charge and conviction.

See how that works?


And the "News" is that it did happen just like the news denied by Democrats and the MSM that Hunter was under investigation by the FBI and that FACT was not Russian propaganda or dis-information.


You are right, there has been no indictment yet but who ever tossed that gun in a dumpster committed a crime. It would be interesting to hear why the person that tossed that gun, did so don't you think?

[Lucas McCain]

HF, I don't have to tell you jack shit. Got it? You're just an anonymous name on a whore board to me. You don't have to tell me jack shit either because I'm also just an anonymous name on a whore board. I don't give a fuck what you think about anything unless you know my real name and I still don't really give a fuck what people think unless it is work related and it is an employee review from my boss that determines my compensation.

I'm not here to answer your questions. I get paid handsomely in the real word to do that shit. I sure the fuck don't do it for free on a whore board. Why would I do that? So we can go back and forth like children for a page in this thread? I said what I had to say, your long winded ass said what you had to say. It's over and no further back and forth is necessary. You get the last words if you want to waste them.

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

HF, I don't have to tell you jack shit. Got it? You're just an anonymous name on a whore board to me. You don't have to tell me jack shit either because I'm also just an anonymous name on a whore board. I don't give a fuck what you think about anything unless you know my real name and I still don't really give a fuck what people think unless it is work related and it is an employee review from my boss that determines my compensation.

Wow, hit a nerve did I? You tell me you only listen to objective facts not talking heads giving subjective opinions. I prove that isn't true, embarrass you and you fly off the handle.


You say you don't give a fuck about what I think and yet you take the time to tell me you think I'm a ......... for listening to Tucker, so obviously you do care what I think.


What you apparently don't like is having objective facts tossed back at you and asked to explain.


Again, you don't have to explain and yet you do.


You seem to be fine giving your opinion but get a little testy when someone offers an opinion of you. Maybe you are right, you aren't cut out for reading subjective opinions.


So to sum up, for a guy only interested in objective facts, man are you in the wrong place.