Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 370
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 262
sharkman29 250
George Spelvin 244
Top Posters
DallasRain70383
biomed160296
Yssup Rider59847
gman4452865
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47428
pyramider46370
bambino40275
CryptKicker37064
Mokoa36485
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35149
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2020, 08:19 PM   #16
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

to be fair, most guys believe that paying $1,000 to fuck someone you don't know, based on her physical attributes is "objectifying", and has much in common with One who would deride a woman he doesn't know, based on her lack of sexual or visual appeal.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 08:23 PM   #17
eccielover
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,267
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
to be fair, most guys believe that paying $1,000 to fuck someone you don't know, based on her physical attributes is "objectifying", and has much in common with One who would deride a woman he doesn't know, based on her lack of sexual or visual appeal.
Sorry man, but it's not "objectifying". It's being selective and choosing to spend your money as you like.
eccielover is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 08:26 PM   #18
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eccielover View Post
Sorry man, but it's not "objectifying". It's being selective and choosing to spend your money as you like.
no need to be sorry.. I spend money on all kinds of different pussy, I dig it. I could use the same terminology you do, but I'm not going to pretend the women I pay to fuck are anything beyond my personal fuck machine.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 08:29 PM   #19
eccielover
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,267
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
no need to be sorry.. I spend money on all kinds of different pussy, I dig it. I could use the same terminology you do, but I'm not going to pretend the women I pay to fuck are anything beyond my personal fuck machine.
Hey neither do I. I don't pay women to be a fuck machine, I'm paying them to go away when I'm done.
eccielover is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 08:35 PM   #20
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eccielover View Post
Hey neither do I. I don't pay women to be a fuck machine, I'm paying them to go away when I'm done.
we could save ourselves a lot of money, if our sex partners went away after we're done.. like Lucas McCain's do, when he finishes up at the Glory Holes
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 08:41 PM   #21
the_real_Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
Encounters: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revenant View Post
She may be political, but Amy Carter is not. Neither is Melania Trump.

And being political does NOT justify insulting women for their looks. When was the last time you saw a thread devoted to insulting the looks of a male politician.

It shows how vile, stupid, and insecure men are that they think that insulting the looks or style of Melania Trump, Michelle Obama, Laura Bush, or Hillary is a valid point.
Ever see any comments about the "Orange Fat Guy" in the White House?
the_real_Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 08:51 PM   #22
HoeHummer
BANNED
 
HoeHummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2019
Location: North
Posts: 3,942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
Chelsea Clinton is political. She's fair game...and pretty plain.
So are yous, squeezedick.
HoeHummer is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 08:55 PM   #23
Revenant
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 12, 2016
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 543
Encounters: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
Ever see any comments about the "Orange Fat Guy" in the White House?
Ah yes. The old "Two wrongs DO make a right" line of logic rears its ugly head.

You truly never learn do you?

And equating insulting a man's looks with insulting a woman's looks has NEVER been a good argument.

FAR more emphasis is unfairly placed on a woman's looks. A female virologist could find a cure for coronavirus and she would STILL get scrutiny for her looks that Dr. Anthony Fauci never gets.
Revenant is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 08:58 PM   #24
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revenant View Post
Ah yes. The old "Two wrongs DO make a right" line of logic rears its ugly head.

You truly never learn do you?
he was saying Men do get posts and threads dedicated to their bad looks. you said they don't. he was giving an example where they do.

has nothing to do with 2 wrongs making a right.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 09:01 PM   #25
Revenant
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 12, 2016
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 543
Encounters: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
to be fair, most guys believe that paying $1,000 to fuck someone you don't know, based on her physical attributes is "objectifying", and has much in common with One who would deride a woman he doesn't know, based on her lack of sexual or visual appeal.
Sorry, but I don't think they have anything in common.

I am paying for beauty, after all. So it is a relevant thing - we are going to have sex and I prefer that she be very beautiful.

And it is not my desire to pay $1000 for an hour. I'd rather pay $150, but that is not an option. The woman with the model looks gets to dictate her price.

But my willingness to meet her price demands does not mean I think it is OK to insult unattractive women.

What is the point in hurting someone's feelings?

Just because I won't pay a homely woman $1000 for an hour doesn't mean I think it is cool to abuse her. Just leave her alone, right?
Revenant is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 09:05 PM   #26
the_real_Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
Encounters: 34
Default

Sometimes rhetorical speech is beyond some people. Notice how the same people take EVERYTHING that Trump says as serious.
the_real_Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 09:05 PM   #27
Revenant
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 12, 2016
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 543
Encounters: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
he was saying Men do get posts and threads dedicated to their bad looks. you said they don't. he was giving an example where they do.

has nothing to do with 2 wrongs making a right.
Maybe or maybe not in this instance.

But I have read enough of JDB's posts in the past to know that he has made gratuitous insults about women's looks for no apparent reason.
Revenant is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 09:22 PM   #28
the_real_Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
Encounters: 34
Default

For no apparent reason? There is always a reason but maybe you can't comprehend.
the_real_Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 09:28 PM   #29
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revenant View Post
I have read enough of JDB's posts in the past to know that he has made gratuitous insults about women's looks for no apparent reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
For no apparent reason? There is always a reason but maybe you can't comprehend.
watch it Revenant, you are only 2-3 posts from making the Taliban list
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 09:30 PM   #30
Revenant
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 12, 2016
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 543
Encounters: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
watch it Revenant, you are only 2-3 posts from making the Taliban list
LOL.


JDB can blow it out his ass.
Revenant is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved