If you know anything about doors, you know there is Left hand vs Right hand and in-swing vs out-swing. But there is also a saloon door, where both sides swing both ways. Let me show you of an example of a saloon door with a conversation between Peter Doocy and the Rhodes Scholar, otherwise known as KJP.
Quote:
...“So when Donald Trump is talking about a bloodbath, it is violent rhetoric,” Doocy stated, adding “What was it when Joe Biden said in 2020, ‘what we can’t let happen is this primary become a negative bloodbath?’”
“You should read what he said in its context. So you gotta read what he said in context —” Jean-Pierre began.
Everyone has read it in context, and she and the Democrats know damn well what the context was when Trump said it, yet they continue to push this pathetic semantic charade because they have nothing else going for them.
“I understand. Bloodbath is an ugly word when Trump used it. What is it when Biden uses it?” Doocy interjected.
“No, no, no. Let’s be very clear. You gotta actually ask me the question in context of what it was said, right? And what it was said when he said that, right, in his remarks, in his speech. So that’s being disingenuous in your question,” the press secretary responded...
...“I’m reading a direct quote from Joe Biden. ‘What we can’t let happen is let this primary become a negative bloodbath,’” Doocy shot back.
“He was talking about a group of people,” Jean-Pierre pathetically continued, adding “A group of people. That’s what he’s talking about. What the president was talking about during the primary was not to allow it to be — the words and the primary and that election — to become negative. Two different things. They’re not the same. They’re not the same. And your question is disingenuous.”
Was Trump not talking about a group of people in the auto industry losing their jobs?
After twice calling Doocy disingenuous, Jean Pierre then suggested Trump was talking about stoking a violent uprising, stating “And so — look, I’m gonna be really mindful here. I’m gonna be really careful. We have to denounce violent rhetoric, which, wherever it comes from — a former leader — we have to denounce that. Because we saw what happened on January 6. We saw what happened there.”
Wow. The gas lighting knows no bounds...
|
FWIW: You can actually view this scholarly debate here:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1775459691100881372
