Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 264
sharkman29 251
George Spelvin 248
Top Posters
DallasRain70423
biomed160635
Yssup Rider59954
gman4452938
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47573
pyramider46370
bambino40333
CryptKicker37085
Mokoa36487
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35404
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-29-2019, 08:42 PM   #91
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Elections have consequences!
No oil sanctions , no real sanctions.

Fake sanctions. . .
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 01-29-2019, 09:15 PM   #92
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Iran is the North Korea of the Middle East.
Not according to our top Intel Chiefs. ..

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...uclear-weapons
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 01-29-2019, 10:15 PM   #93
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamscram View Post
Trump is right and the rest of the world is wrong. LOL

Love you trumkins spin on everything.
At least you did remember to put FIFY this time.
The Iranian engineer who admitted that Iran intentionally violated the terms of Odumbo's treaty from day-one doesn't work for Trump. Your spin suggesting he does would make you wrong.



Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
Bamscram if you want to read something comical read adavs posts in this tread when he reply's to IBs nonsense. I almost felt sorry for IB. Adav knew his shit. IB was searching the internet. It was like watching a Rocky movie. IB got hammered. Adav is wearing the USA colors. IB is the Russian

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbVqciFRioA
That the Iranian engineer admitted Iran intentionally violated the terms of Odumbo's treaty from day-one means that anyone trying to defend Odumbo's broke-ass treaty doesn't have a factual leg to stand on.


Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Not according to our top Intel Chiefs. ..

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...uclear-weapons
Sources closer to Iran say differently.

http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 11:27 AM   #94
bamscram
Valued Poster
 
bamscram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 23, 2016
Location: north KCMO
Posts: 5,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The Iranian engineer who admitted that Iran intentionally violated the terms of Odumbo's treaty from day-one doesn't work for Trump. Your spin suggesting he does would make you wrong.





That the Iranian engineer admitted Iran intentionally violated the terms of Odumbo's treaty from day-one means that anyone trying to defend Odumbo's broke-ass treaty doesn't have a factual leg to stand on.




Sources closer to Iran say differently.

http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/

Trump's own security people said he was wrong on Iran, North Korea, and ISIS.
bamscram is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 01:41 PM   #95
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamscram View Post
Trump's own security people said he was wrong on Iran, North Korea, and ISIS.
Sources closer to Iran say differently.

http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 01:43 PM   #96
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Sources closer to Iran say differently.

http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/
If you keep lying IB adav is going to get on and school you again
themystic is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 02:00 PM   #97
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
If you keep lying IB adav is going to get on and school you again
You would be lying when you claim I lied. Read what the Iranian engineer said about how Iran never had any intention of adhering to Odumbo's treaty requirements.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 04:07 PM   #98
bamscram
Valued Poster
 
bamscram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 23, 2016
Location: north KCMO
Posts: 5,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Sources closer to Iran say differently.

http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/

bamscram is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 04:15 PM   #99
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamscram View Post
I B has a source in Iran!

He knows more evidently than Trumpds handpicked heads of the CIA,FBI and NIA.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 07:56 PM   #100
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamscram View Post
A goofy emoticon is the best retort you could muster? Meanwhile:

http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
I B has a source in Iran!

He knows more evidently than Trumpds handpicked heads of the CIA,FBI and NIA.
Sources closer to Iran say what they say, and no doubt the DNI sudied those Photoshopped images provided to them by the Iranians before they came to their conclusion.

http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 11:28 PM   #101
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,258
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Sources closer to Iran say differently.

http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/
Your source may live in Iran but he lies just as much as you do. Of course they gave up a lot. Your source said they didn't give up much. Your source said Iran can enrich Uranium to 20% U-235 concentration. Iran did give up a lot. Before the deal that Obama cut with them, they had 20,000 centrifuges in operation, 19,000 slow speed and 1000 high speed. As part of the Iran had to turn off 13,000 slow speed centrifuges and all 1000 high speed centrifuges. Iran can only enrich to 3.76% U-235 concentration. In 2015 they had enriched up to 20%. They had to sell or trade the highly enriched Uranium concentrations between 5 and 20%, for natural Uranium in return that has a U-235 concentration of .07%. The only Iran plant that is allowed to to enrich up to 3.76 percent is under constant monitoring 24/7 in real time. These constraints will be lifted in 10 years. Therefore Kerry WAS NOT LYING, if the centrifuges are turned off for 10 years, there is no way for Iran to enrich the Uranium. The chart in the link below sums up the deal, which was backed by America's best scientists. If Iran did not give up anything they would have already had a nuclear weapon. Your source statements contradicts the statements of Allbright, who said Iran must turn on the centrifuges and start enriching again if they want a nuclear weapon. They both can't be right one of them has to be wrong. Allbright is suppose to be taking information from documents that Israel stole.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_...Plan_of_Action

Iran had done a lot of enriching up to 2014.

https://www.eccie.net/newreply.php?d...y&p=1057071928
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 11:56 PM   #102
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,404
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
Your source may live in Iran but he lies just as much as you do. Of course they gave up a lot. Your source said they didn't give up much. Your source said Iran can enrich Uranium to 20% U-235 concentration. Iran did give up a lot. Before the deal that Obama cut with them, they had 20,000 centrifuges in operation, 19,000 slow speed and 1000 high speed. As part of the Iran had to turn off 13,000 slow speed centrifuges and all 1000 high speed centrifuges. Iran can only enrich to 3.76% U-235 concentration. In 2015 they had enriched up to 20%. They had to sell or trade the highly enriched Uranium concentrations between 5 and 20%, for natural Uranium in return that has a U-235 concentration of .07%. The only Iran plant that is allowed to to enrich up to 3.76 percent is under constant monitoring 24/7 in real time. These constraints will be lifted in 10 years. Therefore Kerry WAS NOT LYING, if the centrifuges are turned off for 10 years, there is no way for Iran to enrich the Uranium. The chart in the link below sums up the deal, which was backed by America's best scientists. If Iran did not give up anything they would have already had a nuclear weapon. Your source statements contradicts the statements of Allbright, who said Iran must turn on the centrifuges and start enriching again if they want a nuclear weapon. They both can't be right one of them has to be wrong. Allbright is suppose to be taking information from documents that Israel stole.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_...Plan_of_Action
yeah .. i cite wiki u cite wiki whose wiki is the right wiki?

see what i mean?

let me follow up with this "comedy skit" .. let me know if you've heard this before..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhW3eyJ_l5Q&t=59s


someone care to translate?


BAHAA

is this real or it it Memorex?
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 12:29 AM   #103
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,258
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
yeah
You okay with the Washington Post? It has the same information as the wiki link. If Trump had not backed out of the deal there was no way for Iran to get a nuclear weapon. The 14,000 centrifuges are turned off for now. Hankering's guy Allbright even said so. With Trump backing out, they could turn the centrifuges back on and start the enrichment process again and get back to where they were in 2015, before the deal with Obama.

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/do...ear-deal/1651/
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 12:40 AM   #104
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,404
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
You okay with the Washington Post? It has the same information as the wiki link. If Trump had not backed out of the deal there was no way for Iran to get a nuclear weapon. The 14,000 centrifuges are turned off for now. Hankering's guy Allbright even said so. With Trump backing out, they could turn the centrifuges back on and start the enrichment process again and get back to where they were in 2015, before the deal with Obama.

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/do...ear-deal/1651/

are you ok with the fact that Iran has CHEATED on years of "inspections"?


BAHAAA

and you trust them ... why?
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 12:56 AM   #105
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,258
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
are you ok with the fact that Iran has CHEATED on years of "inspections"?


BAHAAA

and you trust them ... why?
I don't trust them and neither does the USA. The 13K high speed and low speed centrifuges were turned off and moved to the Natanz nuke plant which is being monitored 24/7 in real time. This is why Trump's CIA director can say with certainty that Iran is compliant with the constraints of the deal. Allbright has read the stolen documents from Israel and has said the same thing, the centrifuges are turned off for now. You and Hankering don't read the links that are provided.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved