Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip_8
OP had a responsibility to not fuck around on his wife, yet he did.
You still see married men, right? Yet you are essentially clamoring for him to do the responsible thing.
He should have worn a rubber, but he didn't and I am assuming that she let him.
If you think about it, ultimately, the lady bears the full weight of raising the child. Any man can walk away. If the OP happened to be just a one time John, out of many, who fucked her and left without even realizing that she would get pregnant this guy would be free and clear.
My interpretation of what Spyder is trying to say is that regardless of the reason for the girl getting pregnant it would probably be wise for her to take the lead on birth control.
Again, the reason for this is that she is the one that's going to be stuck with the consequences for sure.
So, if I was a woman and was going to fuck 2-10 guys a day, I would damn sure be on some sort of birth control because, I have known men who got women pregnant that used condoms correctly.
If she knowingly gave him HIV then yes it would be her fault.
If she unknowingly gave him HIV, then it's not her fault.
People are doing things they should not be doing. Ex. Cheating hubby, Home wrecking whore, etc.
People are not going to stop doing those things.
If you really want guys to do the right thing... you ladies might go broke. |
Everything you said, I agree with. My only problem with what Mr. Spyder said is the fact that he was trying to give this man an out on any responsibility he needs to take for his actions in this.
And because people won't stop doing the wrong thing, it would be best to start thinking about how to do them better, with possibly just a little more thought. Darling, broke is one thing I'll never be. I've got more than a few skills to pay the bills.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpyderToezzzz
Why do you have to take a personal jab at me? This thread is not about me. I just merely stated what I believed to be true. I suppose selective reading is something people suffer from. Fortunately for me it is all there for you to go back and read. I stated that I would not be in that situation. I wrote about his moral responsiblity.But did you address any of that. No. You focused on the negative. I am just going to assume that the bad stuff I wrote upset you so much that your emotional side took over. Causing you to miss some very important things that I wrote.
I take full responsiblity for my actions. Always have and always will. I mentioned that I would not be in his situation. I would never go elsewhere to play if I were in a relationship. Whether it be an ex from my past. A coworker. Or an escort. I would keep Slim Shady in the safe confines on my boxers while around other women.
I was just giving my interpertation of the "rules".
|
I read your statements, and I commend them. And we think just alike in that respect (I should not have to be a companion if I had a man). And yes, I did focus on the negative. Like I said, there are no easy outs for this man, and pointing the finger at her as the only person at fault for her pregnancy hit a nerve for me. Anyway, I do apologize for jabbing you.
Yes, it's always mama's baby, daddy's maybe. But as the adult in this situation, and with so much to lose, I just think that he should have thought more about the situation, who she is, and deal with her accordingly. It's like seeing a hungry tiger in a cage, and making the decision to stick your hand in to feed it and wondering why you got bit.
My Bio Page - Texas - South
My Bio Page - Texas - San Antonio
I would never partake as an hour of enhanced pleasure is not worth the possibility of a lifetime of suffering or even having it cut-short if what I caught was incurable.
