Poll: Free Jon Balls

[guest102613-2]

that wasnt my point that we dont post here bc of that. maybe i should have worded it diff. what i mean is all of us ladies are chirping in and in agreement (i think) so the mods should give it thought

[offshoredrilling]

[offshoredrilling]

or you have



sorry for some reason I could only find a female wearing a no balls shirt. When in reality

[GP]

How about this?

[offshoredrilling]

not sure what he charge the gals. But he is not free LOL

unless he really likes her, then he may even pay

[cnym]

I do not know him
I have never met him

FREE Jon Balls

I voted YES

[Doove]

Originally Posted by Doove

But then i realized, it's an escort review board!

Originally Posted by GP

Too bad you don't realize this more often.

Yeah? Not once have i white-knighted (as you would say) a provider in a review thread. So what's your point?

[offshoredrilling]

true, not in a review.

[Perryay]

Originally Posted by Doove

Yeah? Not once have i white-knighted (as you would say) a provider in a review thread. So what's your point?

How about a review thread that turned into an alert thread?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=72812&page=2

been polishing your armor lately?

[Doove]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

Bussbomb may have needed a temp ban, but not life. The life ban is and was a cheap shot.

Ok then. But remember, he was ultimately allowed back in. Only, he got himself banned again for his comments. Then after awhile, he was allowed back in yet again. And got banned, once again, for his comments.

So he's been banned 3 times for his comments, and he's broken a board rule, as a low-ball estimate, about 20 times.

I don't see where being an entertaining goof-ball should trump all that.

Sorry, i'm with the mods on this one.

[offshoredrilling]

I don't think he was banned for his words. But rather a rumor. That most providers say is untrue. I wish you went to the M&G.

words are good for banned for a week to 90 days. Most times 30 is what is given, not forever. And he is not the only one that was banned for life over just words as we are told.

[offshoredrilling]

mmm wlhrgfan is that thread also, how funny.

But doove did not join in till after it was moved out of reviews. I think. or how I see it after rereading.

yet thanks for the reminder Perryay


Dang I like doove. but I feel dirty defending him. You got something I can take to fix that perryay

[Doove]

Originally Posted by Perryay

How about a review thread that turned into an alert thread?

Where i said this...

"I'm not making the argument that she's any good at her craft. All i'm suggesting is that the level of abuse that she took was, i thought, unfair, whether she's a good provider or a bad provider. Now, if she crossed over to the level of being a con artist, then that would be different. But the totality of her reviews, while wholly unimpressive, don't seem to confirm that she's a con artist."

...after she had spent 4 days getting hammered by people who had never seen her? Including yourself? Alright, guilty as charged.

Good work, Perryay. You found 1 example in almost 2 years of my being on this board that backs up GP's lame point. Well done!

[GP]

Originally Posted by Doove

GP's lame point. Well done!

My lame point? sheeesh!!!!

My point was you don't review very often. That is why I said...

Originally Posted by GP

Too bad you don't realize this more often.

which was in response to...

Originally Posted by doove

But then i realized, it's an escort review board!

[Doove]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

I don't think he was banned for his words. But rather a rumor. That most providers say is untrue.

Well, if it was due to a false rumor, then that would definitely be unfortunate.

I'd be curious, however, as to what sort of rumor "most providers" could know to be untrue. Unless they were a subject of the rumor(s), then they could only offer an opinion.

Remember, customers/hobbyists/posters can be YMMV too.