One chart shows the Vaxx was worthless

[Jacky S]

Originally Posted by Michael8219

Per USA facts (as of May 10):

What's the nation's progress on vaccinations?
At least 270,227,181 people or 81% of the population have received at least one dose.

Overall, 230,637,348 people or 70% of the population are considered fully vaccinated.
[URL="http://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQbOwGmla-KW1tFMILCA_BqMku_BeNwGS9aSIX1H bgJJg&s=10"]http://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQbOwGmla-KW1tFMILCA_BqMku_BeNwGS9aSIX1H bgJJg&s=

From July 2022 NIH Record:
“With barely a moment’s rest since the pandemic began, Fauci, 81, still shows little sign of slowing down. “Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases have been on the forefront of my mind literally for the 38 years that I’ve been the director of NIAID,” he said.

Although he contemplates retirement, he hasn’t set a specific date.

“I can tell you I certainly hope to retire before I die. That is my goal,” he said with a smile. But for now, “I am just going to have to focus on my job.”

And there is much left to do during a pandemic that is waning but not over. “We are still in the middle of this,” he said. “And although we are doing much better than we were a year or a year and a half ago, we still have a severe challenge in front of us.””

The biggest challenge is keeping experimenters like Fauci and his Chicom buddies from messing around with things that could kill billions.

The line spoken by Jeff Goldbloom’s character in Jurassic Park rings true.

“Your scientist were so caught up in the knowledge that they COULD do something, that blinded as to whether they SHOULD”.

[Michael8219]

Originally Posted by Jacky S

The biggest challenge is keeping experimenters like Fauci and his Chicom buddies from messing around with things that could kill billions.

The line spoken by Jeff Goldbloom’s character in Jurassic Park rings true.

“Your scientist were so caught up in the knowledge that they COULD do something, that blinded as to whether they SHOULD”.

Slightly off topic but tied to scientists experimenting with DNA:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...-woolly-mouse/

Some of these things, like gain of function research and “enhancing DNA” should not be allowed…. Or we’re gonna be like Newman in J Park!

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

...From the CBSNEWS link:

[B]An update from the president's doctor, released by the White House on Saturday, said genomic sequencing determined that Mr. Biden was infected with the KP 2.3 variant...

You might have skipped over the red highlighted words in your reference, without awareness of what they actually mean. Luckily, he CDC explains them suscinctly.

What is Genomic Sequencing?

Key points:

• The genome of an organism is made up of a unique DNA or RNA sequence.
• Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) determines the order of all, or most, of the nucleotides in the genome.
• The information encoded in the genomes of bacteria, viruses, and fungi provide researchers with unique genetic "fingerprints."...

Imma toss in an AI answer to the below question heading. It is consistent with a wide selection of answer sources.

Genomic Sequencing Test

Genomic sequencing is determined through a comprehensive genetic test that analyzes all or a significant portion of an individual's DNA. This test can be performed using whole genome sequencing, which examines the entire DNA sequence, or whole exome sequencing, which focuses on the protein-coding regions of the genome.

The process of genomic sequencing involves several steps:

• A sample of DNA is collected from the individual, typically through a blood, saliva, or tissue sample.
• The DNA is extracted and sequenced using sophisticated machines that determine the order of the four nucleotides (A, C, T, G) in the genetic code.
• The sequence data is analyzed by computers using algorithms to check quality, assemble the DNA sequence, and compare it against a reference genome.

Seems to me they performed a DNA test on Ol' Puddin Head. Maybe the algorithms ignored all that was not a hit to a specific known "reference genome" or maybe they didn't. Highly likely they would have to.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by 69in2it69

Remember the vax you're railing against was developed by your cult leader...

If you're talking about Trump, he didn't develop the Vaccine he promoted it. The majority of people who took the jab didn't vote for Trump that should tell ya something, lol.

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

You might have skipped over the red highlighted words in your reference, without awareness of what they actually mean. Luckily, he CDC explains them suscinctly.Imma toss in an AI answer to the below question heading. It is consistent with a wide selection of answer sources.Seems to me they performed a DNA test on Ol' Puddin Head. Maybe the algorithms ignored all that was not a hit to a specific known "reference genome" or maybe they didn't. Highly likely they would have to.

You can get yourself into trouble when you cherry pick the information. You left out some bullet points from the CDC link. You left out Step 4:

Analysis Of The Sequencing. From the link:

The sequencer produces data—millions of long strings of letters—that are then assembled together or aligned with a reference sequence. Analytical programs compare the new sequence data to the reference sequence and identify variations in the sample that allow scientists to infer an ancestral relationship, much like a family tree. New pathogens can be identified by comparing their sequence to a database of all known pathogens and finding related species.

It should not be that difficult to relate one variant of SARS_CoV2 virus to another. Under a microscope with a lot of magnification the Crown of a SARS_CoV2 Virus can be seen easily. The Corona part of the name comes from this Crown-like structure that all Corona viruses have.

There is no doubt that Biden was infected with a variant (KP 2.3) of SARS_CoV2 virus in July of 2024. It was not Influeza_A or any other pathogen.

We can communicate when you return from your vacation.

https://www.cdc.gov/advanced-molecul...equencing.html

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

If you're talking about Trump, he didn't develop the Vaccine he promoted it. The majority of people who took the jab didn't vote for Trump that should tell ya something, lol.

There are 230 million fully vaccinated people. In the 2024 presidential election 75 million voted for Harris and 77 million voted for Trump.

If you subtract the 75 million that voted for Harris from 230 million that were fully vaccinated that leaves 155 million fully vaccinated people that could have voted for Trump. Trump only had 77 million people vote for him. But how can you say with absolute certainty that most of the people that voted for Trump were not vaccinated?

https://usafacts.org/visualizations/...racker-states/

https://www.cnn.com/election/2024/re...emaining=false