Ungrateful Jewish Leaders Tell President Trump He Is Not Welcome.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

I have tried to explain the difference between regressive and progressive taxes, if they can not understand that simple concept, they will never understand wealth and how a small few conttol (sic) most of it.

So you think you know more about taxes and tax policy than I do? That's the funniest thing I've read here in years!



You probably think you deserve a Nobel in Economics for your facile "explanations" of supply side theory in this forum lol! Remember how tax revenues almost doubled after Ronnie Reagan licked your Laffer Curve sweet spot?

Tell me again, WTF - where did you study economics? Did you earn a BA, BS, masters degree or Phd in the field?

Let me know and I'll go see if I can get CaptainMidnight to join in your high-level discussion.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

So you think you know more about taxes and tax policy than I do? That's the funniest thing I've read here in years!



You probably think you deserve a Nobel in Economics for your facile "explanations" of supply side theory and the Laffer Curve in this forum lol!

Tell me again, WTF - where did you study economics? Did you earn a BA, BS, masters degree or Phd in the field?

Let me know and I'll see if I can get Captain Midnight to join the discussion.

Ask him about the sugar high from these tax cuts and how much longer he thinks we will run 4.2 GDP quarters.

I just read that 2.7 of the 4.2 could be attributed to stimulus spending (that includes tax cuts). yhat will not be forth coming nxt year.

[lustylad]

The last stimulus legislation we had in this country was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Trump signed a tax reform bill, not a spending stimulus.

This "sugar high" already looks like it will be a lot more effective and longer-lasting than ARRA.

Now what was your degree in economics again?

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Given the ridiculousness earlier this year when Trump signed off on the U.S. move to Jerusalem after decades of Congressional action to do so (with bi-partisan support), it is remarkably and equally ridiculous for the Liberals to start any chant about Trump's "racism" over the Jews (forget his family members who are "Jews"!), and the spot-lighting of some limited Jewish-anti/never Trump HACKS to wanted HillariousNoMore to win! I realize they probably want a refund from "the fund," but ....

.. all the noise generated by the media would have been better spent on the Red Socks!

Who are the REAL anti-semites?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

The last stimulus legislation we had in this country was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Trump signed a tax reform bill, not a spending stimulus.

This "sugar high" already looks like it will be a lot more effective and longer-lasting than ARRA.

Now what was your degree in economics again?

You wanna bet me that GDP does not continue above 4.0 for the next 4 quarters?

A kool-aid drinker worth of Economics degree is still just a Kool-Aid drinker

[bambino]

Originally Posted by WTF

You wanna bet me that GDP does not continue above 4.0 for the next 4 quarters?

A kool-aid drinker worth of Economics degree is still just a Kool-Aid drinker

The original bet was 3% annualized. I’m sure Lusty can find it.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by bambino

The original bet was 3% annualized. I’m sure Lusty can find it.

Yes Einstein that is the wager.

lusty is talking shit now, I'm ready to bet him for the next 4 quarters.

If I lose to you and am gone for a year and then he takes this bet and I lose, I'll be gone for another year. But he will not wager...he knows this was a sugar high.

Who is the real loser in such a bet?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bambino

The original bet was 3% annualized. I’m sure Lusty can find it.

Has he collected on that one yet?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Who are the REAL anti-semites?

Of course. It's in their Democratic Party blood and bone marrow.




And they are dismissive of their own as well.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Has he collected on that one yet?

Please sit down, you are the last one that should be commenting on any bets.

Your speciality is to comment AFTER a bet is completed.


You're a 20/20 bettor. You never bet or make a prediction, you comment after the fact.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

A kool-aid drinker worth of Economics degree is still just a Kool-Aid drinker

So you admit you don't have any formal education in the subject!

It wouldn't even matter to me - except for the way you talk down to everyone like you have a superior understanding of economics. Where the fuck does that come from if you never even took a course in it?

Then you swagger like a know-it-all and say things like "they will never understand wealth..."

Well, guess what - many folks who never studied a lick of economics understand the simple concept that when the government gets the fuck out of the way, more wealth is created!

They get it, and you don't.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by WTF

Yes Einstein that is the wager.

lusty is talking shit now, I'm ready to bet him for the next 4 quarters.

If I lose to you and am gone for a year and then he takes this bet and I lose, I'll be gone for another year. But he will not wager...he knows this was a sugar high.

Who is the real loser in such a bet?

Einstein, I never made a 4% bet and never would. But we did have a 3% bet which you are going to lose. C Ya!!!!!!!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bambino

...I never made a 4% bet and never would. But we did have a 3% bet which you are going to lose.

Whose holding the wage-money?

Or was this one of those meaningless "vacation" wagers?

[bambino]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Whose holding the wage-money?

Or was this one of those meaningless "vacation" wagers?

He wanted to bet 10k, I don’t think he has it.

[Wakeup]

Get back on topic...