Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
George Spelvin 310
Starscream66 300
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 262
Top Posters
DallasRain71327
biomed167631
Yssup Rider62797
gman4454986
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49470
WTF48272
pyramider46416
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid39817
CryptKicker37388
Mokoa36499
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34095

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-15-2017, 04:56 PM   #61
NiceGuy53
Valued Poster
 
NiceGuy53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 6, 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,979
Encounters: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamscram View Post


You are as fucking dumb as he is. Been 69ing?

I 69 with hot women. You 69 with other men. Big difference there fag boy! If you can get the dicks out of your mouth long enough, you should try 69 with a woman.
NiceGuy53 is online now   Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 05:33 PM   #62
gary5912
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Feb 18, 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,776
Encounters: 14
Default

retarded lenny we know you eat cockroaches but you don't have post pictures of them moron
gary5912 is offline   Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 06:08 PM   #63
bambino
BANNED
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 45,243
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary5912 View Post
retarded lenny we know you eat cockroaches but you don't have post pictures of them moron
Retarded Lenny is a lying cockroach.
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 06:21 PM   #64
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 07:54 PM   #65
bamscram
Valued Poster
 
bamscram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 23, 2016
Location: north KCMO
Posts: 5,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary5912 View Post
retarded lenny we know you eat cockroaches but you don't have post pictures of them moron
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
Retarded Lenny is a lying cockroach.
Dumb fucks don't know a cricket from a cockroach, and they both suck cock.
bamscram is offline   Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 08:13 PM   #66
skirtchaser79411
Valued Poster
 
skirtchaser79411's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 16, 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 3,511
Encounters: 69
Default

YES HE IS
skirtchaser79411 is offline   Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 09:30 PM   #67
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary5912 View Post
retarded lenny we know you eat cockroaches but you don't have post pictures of them moron
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
Retarded Lenny is a lying cockroach.
gary, bambino, that's a cricket, not a cockroach!

this is a cockroach. ugly suckers.

dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 02:58 PM   #68
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
2 million more to lose health insurance under Obama care.
20 million people would lose their health insurance if the "Trumpcare" plan passed by the House of Reps gets passed by the Senate. Fortunately, the Senate is not discussing the bill passed by the House of Reps and is writing their own bill.
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 03:04 PM   #69
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
20 million people would lose their health insurance if the "Trumpcare" plan passed by the House of Reps gets passed by the Senate. Fortunately, the Senate is not discussing the bill passed by the House of Reps and is writing their own bill.
There are three republican senators that are against the Senate bill. They don't want to lose the Expanded Medicaid for their states. Senator Susan Collins of Maine is one of the three.
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 03:15 PM   #70
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
Obamacare is failing and will collapse. Even if the GOP fails to repeal it, it will still collapse.
Nothing but speculation by you JDrunk. If the ACA is collapseing , then why are the Health Insurance companies filing new rates with the "Commissioner of Health Insurance" for each state? There is no need to file a rate with the "Commissioner of Health Insurance" if you don't plan on selling health insurance in a particular state. As for choice, there was as much choice in 2017 as there was in 2016 for most policyholders. JDrunk, you simply do not know what you are talking about!
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 03:20 PM   #71
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
20 million people would lose their health insurance if the "Trumpcare" plan passed by the House of Reps gets passed by the Senate. Fortunately, the Senate is not discussing the bill passed by the House of Reps and is writing their own bill.

You're lying again, flighty. Most of those 20 million would not "lose" but rather would elect for themselves "not to buy" health insurance and use that money for other needs, flighty. Most of the remaining balance of that 20 million should never have been put on Medicaid to begin with, flighty. If you want to spout your nonsense to someone you think is too stupid to see the truth, flighty, go talk to yourself in the mirror.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 03:35 PM   #72
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
. Most of the remaining balance of that 20 million should never have been put on Medicaid to begin with.
You don't know what you are talking about either. There are 10 million people who are getting the expanded Medicaid. They fall in the category of "family of 4" and make less that $24,000. These people don't make enough to qualify for a subsidy for a private plan. Those are the facts liar. Why don't you ask the republican Senator Susan Collins from Maine, if poor people should get Expanded Medicaid. She is certainly against any bill where Maine would lose their Expanded Medicaid.

Your dumbass would have poor uninsured people flood the emergency room of a hospital when they get sick. Guess what dumbass the emergency room is the most expensive place to get treated.
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 03:42 PM   #73
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
You don't know what you are talking about either. There are 10 million people who are getting the expanded Medicaid. They fall in the category of "family of 4" and make less that $24,000. These people don't make enough to qualify for a subsidy for a private plan. Those are the facts liar. Why don't you ask the republican Senator Susan Collins from Maine, if poor people should get Expanded Medicaid. She is certainly against any bill where Maine would lose their Expanded Medicaid.

Your dumbass would have poor uninsured people flood the emergency room of a hospital when they get sick. Guess what dumbass the emergency room is the most expensive place to get treated.
You're a lying sack of shit, flighty. The CBO reported that millions of people YOUR ilk claims will 'lose their health insurance' will actually voluntarily self-elect not to pay premiums for health insurance, flighty. And it's a well known fact that you fuckin' dim-retards changed the definitions of 'disability' to include many who had here-to-fucking-fore been considered not disabled and functionally employable, flighty.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 07:03 PM   #74
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You're a lying.
I am not lying. There is a good reason why you will not talk about Expanded Medicaid, your dumbass does not understand what it is. Here is a summary for your dumbass.

1. Thirty one states took the Expanded Medicaid option. The Federal Government pays 90% of the cost. The state will pay 10% of the cost. Ten million people in the 31 states that took it are on Expanded Medicaid, that is a fact.

2. A family of 4 must make less than $24,000 to qualify. You get an insurance card from your state. You do not deal with a health insurance company (you don't get a private health insurance plan from the government exchange).

3. In the Trumpcare bill passed by the house of representatives, Expanded Medicaid goes away in three years (The Federal government will stop paying 90% of the cost). That means dumbass that 10 million people will lose their expanded Medicaid. The people who get this are not paying a premium for it dumbass, IT'S FREE. So, your sentence about these people spending money on other things is nothing but BULLSHIT.

4. All you do is post Bullshit over and over and over again.!!!!!!!

https://www.medicaid.gov/affordable-...ity/index.html
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 07:50 PM   #75
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
I am not lying. There is a good reason why you will not talk about Expanded Medicaid, your dumbass does not understand what it is. Here is a summary for your dumbass.

1. Thirty one states took the Expanded Medicaid option. The Federal Government pays 90% of the cost. The state will pay 10% of the cost. Ten million people in the 31 states that took it are on Expanded Medicaid, that is a fact.

2. A family of 4 must make less than $24,000 to qualify. You get an insurance card from your state. You do not deal with a health insurance company (you don't get a private health insurance plan from the government exchange).

3. In the Trumpcare bill passed by the house of representatives, Expanded Medicaid goes away in three years (The Federal government will stop paying 90% of the cost). That means dumbass that 10 million people will lose their expanded Medicaid. The people who get this are not paying a premium for it dumbass, IT'S FREE. So, your sentence about these people spending money on other things is nothing but BULLSHIT.

4. All you do is post Bullshit over and over and over again.!!!!!!!

https://www.medicaid.gov/affordable-...ity/index.html
Every time you chant Odumbo's mantra you're lying, flighty. Odumbo rigged the numbers to entitle mutha fuckers that have no right to other people's money,
flighty.


Quote:
When the White House tried to bring the Census Bureau under direct White House control early in 2009, there was an outcry that this was a political ploy to control congressional redistricting and the allocation of government spending. Critics may have missed one more reason why Odumbo wanted more control of the Census Bureau: to redefine what constitutes "poverty."

Robert Rector writes in "Team O's Poor Trick" that "it was a surreptitious and dubious shift by the Odumbo administration, setting the 'near-poverty' income level very close to the median-household income in most communities" that led to the sudden addition of millions of people to the lower-income realm. Median income is the point at which half the households have more income and half have less.

Rector writes:
Thus, it was foreordained that, using this new standard, the Census folks "discovered" that almost half the population is living in "near-poverty" conditions. That is, if you define "near poverty" as an income roughly equal to the median, that means that by definition nearly half the population will always be "poor" or "near poor" - regardless of any changes in actual living standards.

Odumbo's new poverty measure will produce very odd results. For example, if the real income of every single American were to magically double overnight, the new measure would show no drop in poverty or "near poverty," because the poverty- and near-poverty income thresholds would also double.

In other words, the president has introduced a statistical trick that gives new meaning to the saying that "the poor will always be with you."

The shift seems designed to promote Odumbo's obsession to "spread the wealth." By suggesting that many more Americans are poor or near-poor, the Census generates political pressure to raise taxes and expand the welfare state.

Of course, Odumbo has already permanently increased welfare spending by nearly a third. This year, the government will spend more than $900 billion on means-tested aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care and social services to poor and low-income persons. (This figure does not include Social Security, Medicare or unemployment insurance.)

This welfare spending comes to around $9,000 for each person in the lowest-income third of the population. And the new "poverty" measure is propaganda to raise the figure further.
Read more: American Thinker
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved