Gary Johnson Wins Libertarian Nomination!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

How many votes had Trumpy got in a presidential election ???

How many have you gotten?

And I'm not talking about President of the Truck Stop Stallers Union!

Hey if you want Hillary to be President, go ahead and support Little Gary!

Obaminable didn't affect my business ... neither will Hillary!

Some others are going to be pissed ... but that was their choice!

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

How many votes had Trumpy got in a presidential election ???

Answer........

Exactly as many as Hillary Clinton.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

And if pigs had wings .....

Then assup wouldn't be fouling the public busses in Austin !

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

How many have you gotten?

And I'm not talking about President of the Truck Stop Stallers Union!

Hey if you want Hillary to be President, go ahead and support Little Gary!

Obaminable didn't affect my business ... neither will Hillary!

Some others are going to be pissed ... but that was their choice!

If you weren't blind drunk, then you could remember I don't support either Hillary or Trumpy.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

Answer........

Exactly as many as Hillary Clinton.

correct.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

If you weren't blind drunk, then you could remember I don't support either Hillary or Trumpy.

You still get me confused with those truckers at the stop who think there is a female on the otherside of the glory hole!

And if you weren't mentally deficient you would realize that supporting a third-party candidate IS SUPPORT FOR EITHER HILLARY OR TRUMP .. in this case the FORMER!

But continue to delude yourself .... along with thinking you are serving the AFL-CIO.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You still get me confused with those truckers at the stop who think there is a female on the otherside of the glory hole!

So you admit being on the receiving side.

And if you weren't mentally deficient you would realize that supporting a third-party candidate IS SUPPORT FOR EITHER HILLARY OR TRUMP .. in this case the FORMER!
Go ahead and vote your party and I can vote mine

But continue to delude yourself .... along with thinking you are serving the AFL-CIO.

Keep sucking those dicks you are doing your part.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

So you decide on how you vote as sign of your "patriotism"?

Unfortunately, our Presidential elections are about a choice of two bad choices.

One of those bad choices will win ... Gary Johnson will not. But by you and others voting for Gary Johnson (or some other Mickey Mouse .. Johnny Come Lately) it defaults one of those two bad choices .... I just happen to believe that the one who benefits from the "default" is the worse choice of all three of them.

"Patriot"? That's about as worn out as the "Race Card" .... By the end of November the "Gender Card" will be worn out also. I'm a "motivationalist" (meaning I examine people's "motives"): Hillarious-No-More NEEDS the job to keep stuffing her stocking (the "charitable fund") like she's been doing since Bill was Governor. Trump doesn't need the job. His stocking is full.

Old Man Bush new a lot about the folks around the world from his past OJT. So does Trump from his business dealings in their neighborhoods. Hillarious-No-More is not smart enough to know and she's too self-centered and narcissistic to give a shit. Trump knows how to compete in the World .... Hillarious-No-More has always been on the government tit ... directly or indirectly. She knows how to spend your money to make her money. She's about "she"!

There's your problem right there. You think you have a choice. You don't. Donald and Hillary are both owned by the same people. There are cosmetic differences, but in substance, nothing will change regardless which one is elected. The choice is either you vote for the Establishment Statists, or you vote against them. I'm not voting for anyone who does not support Liberty, and neither Hillary nor Donald do.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

There's your problem right there. You think you have a choice.

There's one of your problems. You think you are smart enough to do my thinking!

If there is more than one person running, I have a choice. I make choices everyday. Some for me. Some for other people. Not doing anything is a choice. Supporting Gary Johnson is in effect not doing anything. It may make you feel good and proud that you "stood up" to the establishment ... so what?

Staying home and not voting is a choice, BTW.

I have NEVER BEEN ABLE TO DECIDE WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT!

Have you?

Now list the people who have decided that Trump should be President.

Most of the shit that these people say they are going to do require Congress to approve it .... that's fine with me. That's why we have "checks and balances" ... And as we've found out (I think you have at least) when Congress doesn't do its job the Courts will weigh in on the matter. Professionally, I deal with "politicians" daily and also deal with their decision making daily. It's a fact of life for me and I find it acceptable, because that is the system we have in which to function. I don't always agree with the process or the outcome, but the alternative is unacceptable to me at least. It's my responsibility to work within the process to influence the outcome, as opposed to attempting to "politic" the result. People like you (apparently) concede that you have no control over the outcome without changing the decision maker ...

.. you are chasing windmills IMO. In my experience it has been easier to change the mind of the decision maker than get rid of the decision maker. But that's me!

So, having said that, between Hillarious-No-More and Trump, who do you think is more receptive to mind-changing suggestions without handing her or him a sack full of money? I think Trump. Have you actually listened to him talk? And I'm not meaning the snippets of marginalizing and ridiculing excerpts by the Clinton media.

[CuteOldGuy]

That's like asking which tower would you like to be in on 9-11. There both going down, just one will be a little faster. But when they go, they take everything with them. Of course, Hillary will be the fastest to fall, but the end result is the same. Disaster.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

That's like asking which tower would you like to be in on 9-11. There both going down, just one will be a little faster. But when they go, they take everything with them. Of course, Hillary will be the fastest to fall, but the end result is the same. Disaster.

If I recall correctly,

....that is essentially what was said about one certain actor who had been a governor!

But it is interesting you would bring up the "towers" ....

.. since the plan to bring them down was spawned while Clintons were in office.

He was busy lining up blow jobs, and she was busy looking for right wing conspiracies!

[CuteOldGuy]

It's a metaphor, LexusLoser. Look it up.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Little Gary .... (I think Iva-Little-One is confused with the "Johnson" thingy)...

.... can't get enough electoral votes, because he can't get on enough ballots.

actually this is incorrect. the libertarian party is on all 50 ballots, the only 3rd party who can make that claim.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

It's a metaphor, LexusLoser. Look it up.

The attacks on 911 on the WTC towers that were begun when the Clintons were in office and continued to be planned throughout Clintons' two terms is a "metaphor"? Interesting!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

actually this is incorrect. the libertarian party is on all 50 ballots, the only 3rd party who can make that claim.

That's your story and you're sticking to it! Is that what Little Gary said?