Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
I thought you opposed lying. You said so yourself. But now you are saying you will vote for the most dishonest candidate to ever run for President. However, I have NEVER voted for a Republican for President. The last Democrat I voted for was McGovern. I expect to vote my conscience, and vote Libertarian again. I will not be a part of the destruction of this country by voting Democrat or Republican. It's like choosing between hemlock or arsenic.
I will vote for freedom. You will vote for slavery. You will win, but not with my help or approval.
You seem pretty sure of yourself, bunker clown.
But you see, I believe in my country too, and cherish the freedom guaranteed by the fucking constitution... Unlike you, I might add.
Why else did Jesus give the fucking constitution to George Washington at Valley Forge?
I don't need a "Congressional committee's conclusions" to tell if HillariousNoMore is lying .... #1, I heard and saw the various "press conferences" during which the "video" was discussed, and observed the media footage of the "videographer" who was arrested. #2, a copy of the email to Chelsea has been published online to read.
You probably missed those FACTS, because you were mouthing off to someone~!
But if you need a governmental agency to keep you informed ... carry on!
So you can bring me up to speed by duplicating your experience, right?
But of course you won't.
A government agency is one of the inputs I use to keep informed. To dismiss congress, our intelligence agencies, and all government sources and to claim they are all engaged in a cover up? Whatever you say.
And you aren't the only Hilary hater. If the repubs could have nailed her they would of.
Plus it is fact the intelligence services continually changed their assessments, and they are her sources.
So why do you think she "lied"? What was she trying to gain?
BTW:
Just on a hunch, I checked what you thought about that "factual" planned parenthood video. You totally bought into that too.
And one of your statements was correct.
There is an LE investigation on going in more than one state right now...
....as well as FBI.
You seemed to be pro government agency then. Is that when you took them off your "who to believe" list? Because they lied about the video and said it was fake?
It's real easy to change the context of what someone said and trash them. What Hillary Clinton said was not wrong. IF you can't understand that no one as smart as Clinton and Obama are would lie about something that they damn well knew would be carefully dissected, you may want to consider remedial learning. What she said was that she hurt for the mother but that the information they originally provided was thought to be accurate. To attack Clinton/Obama for Benghazi is utterly stupid. There were THIRTEEN similar events during Bush's administrations.
I'm still waiting for an investigation that concluded she intentionally misled anyone. They all, thus far, confirm that there was conflicting intelligence coming in at the beginning.
It's real easy to change the context of what someone said and trash them. What Hillary Clinton said was not wrong. IF you can't understand that no one as smart as Clinton and Obama are would lie about something that they damn well knew would be carefully dissected, you may want to consider remedial learning. What she said was that she hurt for the mother but that the information they originally provided was thought to be accurate. To attack Clinton/Obama for Benghazi is utterly stupid. There were THIRTEEN similar events during Bush's administrations.
From the evidence and testimony of key personnel, it's quite evident that Odumbo and Hildabeast deliberately reduced security staffing to an unsafe level and subsequently refused to entertain any requests asking for additional security personnel; hence, Odumbo and Hildabeast are blame worthy for their willful negligence and their failure as leaders to properly asses the true threat level in Benghazi. Furthermore, the notion that there was "confusing and/or contradictory" intel flowing out of Libya that night as to what led to the Benghazi attack has also been refuted by the evidence and testimony of key personnel ... and by Hildabeast's own emails wherein she reported the truth to her family and inner circle of associates while she simultaneously lied to the American people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
So you can bring me up to speed by duplicating your experience, right?
But of course you won't.
A government agency is one of the inputs I use to keep informed. To dismiss congress, our intelligence agencies, and all government sources and to claim they are all engaged in a cover up? Whatever you say.
And you aren't the only Hilary hater. If the repubs could have nailed her they would of.
Plus it is fact the intelligence services continually changed their assessments, and they are her sources.
So why do you think she "lied"? What was she trying to gain?
BTW:
Just on a hunch, I checked what you thought about that "factual" planned parenthood video. You totally bought into that too.
And one of your statements was correct.
There is an LE investigation on going in more than one state right now...
....as well as FBI.
You seemed to be pro government agency then. Is that when you took them off your "who to believe" list? Because they lied about the video and said it was fake?
Per the testimony and email evidence, it's an established fact there was no "confusing or contradictory" intel coming out of Libya that night, Masterdickmuncher. That "it was a video" story was wholesale fiction fabricated by the Odumbo administration, Masterdickmuncher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eatfibo
I'm still waiting for an investigation that concluded she intentionally misled anyone. They all, thus far, confirm that there was conflicting intelligence coming in at the beginning.
To do that, eatbibeau, you need only pull your head out of your ass, go to C-Span and re-watch that portion of the October 2015 hearing where Rep. Jordan calls Hildabeast a liar and backs up his assertion with the substantive evidence to validate his claim.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
You seem pretty sure of yourself, bunker clown.
But you see, I believe in my country too, and cherish the freedom guaranteed by the fucking constitution... Unlike you, I might add.
Why else did Jesus give the fucking constitution to George Washington at Valley Forge?
It's an established fact that you don't believe in either the Constitution or Jesus, and you're factually wrong about Valley Forge; hence, your whole post is again vacuous and, as usual, without substance, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
You don't need a Congressional committee," LLEPHANTMAN. You need another lobotomy. The first one didn't take.
But you see, I believe in my country too, and cherish the freedom guaranteed by the fucking constitution... Unlike you, I might add.
Why else did Jesus give the fucking constitution to George Washington at Valley Forge?
I especially cherish the part of the constitution which reserves for the states those rights not specifically given to the Federal government - that and the right to keep and bear arms.
But you see, I believe in my country too, and cherish the freedom guaranteed by the fucking constitution... Unlike you, I might add.
Why else did Jesus give the fucking constitution to George Washington at Valley Forge?
Then why do you openly support a known liar with a history of corruption for President? Why do you support more limitations on freedom? And why do you show such disrespect for the Constitution, AssupLiar?
To do that, eatbibeau, you need only pull your head out of your ass, go to C-Span and re-watch that portion of the October 2015 hearing where Rep. Jordan calls Hildabeast a liar and backs up his assertion with the substantive evidence to validate his claim.
The fact still remains that we have yet to have an investigation conclude that Clinton lied or misled anyone. The timeline all seems to support the conclusions of the previous investigations, that new, contradictory information was coming in all the time from intelligence agencies.
Will the conclusion of this committee conclude otherwise? Probably not. But it is possible. But the reality is that you want her to have lied, so you focus on and listen to those who tell you the narrative you want to hear, rather than looking at the facts, and conclusion of multiple GOP led investigations, that concluded the exact opposite.
The fact still remains that we have yet to have an investigation conclude that Clinton lied or misled anyone. The timeline all seems to support the conclusions of the previous investigations, that new, contradictory information was coming in all the time from intelligence agencies.
Will the conclusion of this committee conclude otherwise? Probably not. But it is possible. But the reality is that you want her to have lied, so you focus on and listen to those who tell you the narrative you want to hear, rather than looking at the facts, and conclusion of multiple GOP led investigations, that concluded the exact opposite.
Rep Jordan spelled it out, eatbibeau. There's no evidence -- nada -- that any state department personnel or intelligence agents reporting from Libya ever attributed the Benghazi assault as a response to a video, eatbibeau. Meanwhile, there is substantive evidence that the Odumbo administration, Nuland, Rhodes, Hildabeast, Blumenthal, etc., manufactured the video story to cover their collective asses in an election year, eatbibeau. Furthermore, there is substantive evidence that Hildabeast personally disavowed, within mere hours of the attack, the notion that the attack in Benghazi was in response to a video while she simultaneously told a different story to the American public, eatbibeau.
Rep Jordan spelled it out, eatbibeau. There's no evidence -- nada -- that any state department personnel or intelligence agents reporting from Libya ever attributed the Benghazi assault as a response to a video, eatbibeau. Meanwhile, there is substantive evidence that the Odumbo administration, Nuland, Rhodes, Hildabeast, Blumenthal, etc., manufactured the video story to cover their collective asses in an election year, eatbibeau. Furthermore, there is substantive evidence that Hildabeast personally disavowed, within mere hours of the attack, the notion that the attack in Benghazi was in response to a video while she simultaneously told a different story to the American public, eatbibeau.
For somebody that is totally indignant when expected to read a portion of the congressional record, let alone to actually search them yourself for content, your challenge is your life in a nutshell. You expect someone else to do the work. Because her lying would get more coverage in that congressional record. It will be much easier to find and that official record would be quoted in many places. But you aren't willing to do that...
You're right, dickmuncher, I'm a lazy sumbitch. Since you seem to like the Congressional Record (notice I'm not too lazy to hit the cap keys) and deem it such an impeccable source, go back and read what IB posted in #33 of this thread. Looks like the Hildabeast's lying is given full coverage in that venerable publication you recommend for citations. Rep. Jim Jordan confronts her with her lies and rubs her nose in the proof of her shamelessly duplicitous conduct. And it's all recorded in your esteemed Congressional Record.
Feel better now, dipshit?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
And now for the questions you won't answer. If you don't have first hand knowledge of the committee's conclusions, how can you be so sure she is lying? And if there is no evidence will you keep acting and believing like there is?
Why do you waste everyone's time, dickmuncher? I know it's hard for you, but please try to keep up. As we've already explained, the SMOKING GUNS proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that Hildabeast lied about Benghazi right out of the gate were not released until October 2015. You do understand that this new SMOKING GUN evidence rendered all previous Benghazi investigations moot, right? If you were a murder suspect and a grand jury “concluded” there was not enough evidence to prosecute you at this time, would you tell the police when they later found the body and the murder weapon you used to commit the crime that they should rely on the grand jury's "conclusion" and disregard the new evidence?
And now for the question both you and eatfido won't touch - why won't you address the SMOKING GUNS directly? Don't they prove Hildabeast intentionally lied when she publicly blamed the Benghazi attack on a stupid youtube video while privately stating the exact opposite?
“We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest.”
- Hillary Clinton speaking to Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Qandil on September 12, 2012.
You didn't answer my question, AssupLiar. But you did show your disrespect for freedom, once again. As usual.
Looks like assup is WKing for Ekim The Inbred Chimp now ! The line at the bottom of the Ekim picture describes the actions of them and their lying liberal buddies !
