Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogface78
I just said I dont wanna hear this tit for tat bullshit!
You didnt get the this was special part?
Did the cops kill some if those morons on my TV for no good reason, you know like the reason BLM movement started?
No?
Then what was the grievance?
Oh, thats right, Dickface was upset he lost the election!
Did Antifa and BLM go to Washington to stage thier own coup that I didnt hear of?
Were they acting like assholes in the halls of Congress?
|
There you go again, tripping all over yourself without even knowing it.
You just lectured us saying “hey they did it too, they did it more, oh so I see your side gets a freebie?
Fuck that!
Your mother never told you two wrongs don't make a right!”
Then you immediately go off ranting about why your side deserves a freebie!
The First Amendment guarantees “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” It says peaceably, not violently. It says grievances - meaning any grievance, not just the ones you happen to support.
Your grievance can be over a police killing, an election, or the lack of toilet paper at your local Walmart. All grievances matter. Put that on your BLM bumper sticker. You don’t get a pass on the “peaceably” part by arguing your grievance is more just, or more worthy of being heard, than the next guy’s grievance.
The democrats encouraged, coddled and defended the antifa/blm violence all summer long. The media kept pushing the obvious falsehood that the protests were “peaceful”… er, I mean “largely peaceful”… er, I mean “fiery but largely peaceful” until the media turned into a complete laughingstock. Is that what you mean when you use the term “enabling”?
It took Biden 3 months to issue his lame condemnation of the violence being perpetrated in multiple cities by his leftist fellow travelers. By then, hundreds of businesses had been burned and looted. Dozens of LE officers were killed or wounded. The DNC convention was held featuring BLM speakers and nary a peep was uttered about the violence. Is that what you mean when you use the term “enabling”?
As everyone knows, Biden was nominated and suddenly faced a national electorate. The polls showed he was vulnerable on the issue, so he finally spoke up. What a principled and courageous stand-up guy!
Compare that to the way Republicans condemned the violence at the Capitol IMMEDIATELY after it happened. No cowardly wavering there. As soon as you cross the line from peaceful protest into violence – you lose! Doesn’t matter what your grievance is. The fastest way to undermine support for any movement is to go violent. If you can’t condemn violence on either side without hesitation, you lose any credibility or moral authority you claim to have. And the Constitution won’t protect you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogface78
This asshole been fomenting these fucking lies since August about them stealing his election!
You guys didnt find that odd?
No you all thought it was alright?
The fact is that you all would have backed any method to steal this election for him!
|
Now you’re pissing me off. Nobody I know wants to “steal” the election for anyone or have it stolen from anyone. And what “fucking lies” are you talking about? Did you find it odd when a number of states during the democratic primaries were incapable of counting their mail-in ballots swiftly or accurately? In some New York races over 25% of the ballots were thrown out. I didn’t hear it from trump. It’s what the media reported. Was it all a “fucking lie”?
I don’t have to support Trump’s exaggerated rhetoric to know mail-in ballots have long been an invitation for electoral mishandling and fraud since they were first invented.
