Review comments, Reviews itself & WKs

[suiram77]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

and IF you were to ever offer me a ride in that shiny black sports car... we might even become friends

Lol that was funny tran!! but I don't think that will be happening anytime
Soon. The car is just my A V pic but I use to have one a few years ago.
I got a lot of speeding tickets in that car so I had to get rid of it.

[albundy]

I love your posts, Chung. You have some funny shit. It seems like that Luke Wyatt guy stirs up more shit than you do. He seems to have an ax to grind.

[Eva Damita]

Originally Posted by Nina the Dicknapper

This question is for the guys since providers aren't allowed to comment on reviews.

Why do u guys consistently chew someone out if they post a negative review on a highly reviewed provider?? Not everyone is going to have the same experience with that provider. If that's what that guy feels about the session then so be it! I've learned that many hobbyist doesn't like to write review just because of the bullshit rants that's come afterwards. I was close to listing names but you know who u!!!!!!

This is an information exchange site not a court room. If that provider didn't get the job done then let it be known!

Also

Why spam a providers comment sections saying negative things went u can write your own review? Why would u tarnish a good review with those little petty remarks on the comments? See me, I appreciate any review giving(bad or good). I just don't understand why a guy would write all this crap in a comment section when his ass can write a simple review.

This. Its just like there's a sudden trend of envious providers disguised as hobbyists/pimps/or just over all haters on some crusade to tarnish anything positive in a review. But, it seems to be a part of board culture as of late, which is why I'm choosy on what and how often I participate. But I agree exactly with what I boldened. One should go see, then write a review of their own.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by albundy

I love your posts, Chung. You have some funny shit. It seems like that Luke Wyatt guy stirs up more shit than you do. He seems to have an ax to grind.

thanks Man.. yeah, Luke Wyatt is not a very personable human being.. a lot of people have seen that for themselves today.

Originally Posted by Eva Damita

This. Its just like there's a sudden trend of envious providers disguised as hobbyists/pimps/or just over all haters on some crusade to tarnish anything positive in a review. But, it seems to be a part of board culture as of late, which is why I'm choosy on what and how often I participate. But I agree exactly with what I boldened. One should go see, then write a review of their own.

ironically this same OP who decried negative comments in reviews, took it upon herself to bash me for WK statements (in general, of course, no specific examples).. see post #23.. maybe she took the bait from my post #21, and decided to throw out any term of derision she could think of at the moment. it is so easy to get under her skin..

[L.A.]

Many have lobbied for reviews to be locked once posted and not allow comments. I'm on the fence about doing that as sometimes (rarely) value is added.

While I don't agree with it, I do understand White Knighting a provider you like that you believe was wronged. If done the wrong way it can do more harm to the provider than good anyway.

The negative comments (especially if you've never even seen the provider) are what I really dislike. If you saw her and had something to say, then it should have been said in YOUR review and then be done with it.

[Luke Skywalker]

Interesting thread

[TinMan]

More so than ever, eliminating comments from review threads would be a mistake. They often reveal the true character of the posters.

[sh!724]

After reading many thread I have decided it is not worth the hassle of posting a "no" or letting everyone know when there is a NCNS. Most of the time it turns into the gentlemans fault when something like this happens.

I had a provider NCNS a couple of weeks back that I had set up about a week in advance. I just marked her off of my list and moved on. I do not need bashed by a bunch of people I do not know for telling you about it.

There are to many ladies out there to let something like this bother me. Besides it is just a hobby.

This is just my opinion for what it is worth.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker

Interesting thread

interesting indeed..

Originally Posted by sh!724

After reading many thread I have decided it is not worth the hassle of posting a "no" or letting everyone know when there is a NCNS. Most of the time it turns into the gentlemans fault when something like this happens.

I had a provider NCNS a couple of weeks back that I had set up about a week in advance. I just marked her off of my list and moved on. I do not need bashed by a bunch of people I do not know for telling you about it.

There are to many ladies out there to let something like this bother me. Besides it is just a hobby.

This is just my opinion for what it is worth.

well said, and unfortunate.. it's easy to say water off a duck's back, it doesn't matter what guys say, be truthful, etc... but I hear you.. sometimes a single troll like the one who trolled everyone yesterday, can give one pause to wonder why he bothers sharing.. all in all, though, this site is great.. a few people need to calm down, and the trolls are usually expelled in a timely manner.

[Guest110416]

Originally Posted by TinMan

More so than ever, eliminating comments from review threads would be a mistake. They often reveal the true character of the posters.

Exactly.

In a way tho, I do like the TER method of reviews where there are no comments under any of the reviews, plus, I believe that TER not only lets the provider reviewed read the VIP area of the review, but also, informs the provider she has a new review and verifies that she saw the individual reviewing her BEFORE they publish the review.

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

interesting indeed..



yes indeed

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by davidfree986

In a way tho, I do like the TER method of reviews where there are no comments under any of the reviews

there's something to be said for that method... stops the Trolls in their tracks. we could PM the reviewer if we need more information.. the problem is on some reviews a hobbyist will post, and he has seen the Provider in question but did not review.. and he becomes the guy who supplies great information, while the original reviewer disappears.

[Guest110416]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

there's something to be said for that method... stops the Trolls in their tracks. we could PM the reviewer if we need more information.. the problem is on some reviews a hobbyist will post, and he has seen the Provider in question but did not review.. and he becomes the guy who supplies great information, while the original reviewer disappears.

That is the key. If he did not review, his opinion on her BCD skills is absolutely worthless. Who is to say he is not making it up just to look good? I prefer my intel of a provider be by someone who has seen AND reviewed her.

[one4all00]

I am dead on with sh!724's position, not worth the grief. Although if we all shared our experiences without the peanut gallery judgments we could save some time/money. I often wonder after a poor experience, either ncns or terminally bad tcb, not seeing anyone else reporting the experience I did, if it is me or if others are adopting the griefless attitude also.

[Mojojo]

Chung and Luke_wyatt this thread isn't for you two to discuss your personal differences. I suggest you two get with the topic of if its too emotional part ways with each other and find another topic of interest.

[Fort Worth Punk]

OK, I hate the whole knight thing since I have met enough guys here to know that:
1) Armor didn't come in those sizes
2) The only place most of them could go to battle commanding a keyboard
and
3) Of the people that have judged me half think I'm a white knight because I said something nice about some lady they have beef with, and half a black knight because I said something they didn't like about some ATF.

So In guess that makes me a grey knight. But this post is going to defend what is seen as negativity on a positive review and attack negativity on a negative review.

The fact is, there are guys (and possibly girls) who write reviews just to help a girl out. She gets a bad review or shits all over the board and suddenly a positive review or two show up. She has a strong rep for bad sessions and it's hurting business and suddenly an ad pops up and, miraculously, so does a positive review at the same time. A girl's business is slow and suddenly a guy who seems like he must be on her payroll writes a review that doesn't match anything anyone else who sees her experiences.

In those cases it does make sense to, depending on the facts, either question the veracity of he review or point out that readers probably shouldn't expect that kind of session. I am not condoning the review stalkers who hit any good review on a girl because they are dickheads. But there really are legitimate reasons to post something that may seem negative, but that really are providing information that is useful.

I would also add there are often details such as a related thread elsewhere, things that are obvious lies and sometimes things about the poster that are worth mentioning because this is an information exchange.

Then there are the white knights, whether generic or girl specific.

Generic white knights just do not get that this board is about exchanging information. They think that it is ungentlemanly to say something negative about a lady. Now, that's kind of funny when you consider the fact that what they wouldn't object to, a positive review, is basically a detailed account of a woman fucking your brains out. And a gentleman doesn't kiss and tell. And if we want to be even more blunt, if a gentleman does have his dalliances, which some would argue he doesn't, he is discrete. Posting on a board about them, even under the illusion of anonymity, is far from discrete.

The other type hope to curry favor with their chosen lady or ladies, assuming of course they are actually clients at all. They believe that it gets them longer and better sessions, and in some cases maybe it does. But the real issue is they do know the point is an exchange of information and they want to control that information. For some what you see on those posts is nothing. I have had one try to hack a web site I ran, try to get my personal information, threaten me, harass me...

Ultimately it's all just the male psyche in action. The comments have the typical locker room high fives. They have the bitter men who have issues with women. They have the "nice guys" who cannot understand why they are in the friend zone. And they have the bullies. And now and then you have people actually asking questions and actually sharing information because that's the whole point.

And there are some of us who actually don't give a fuck if we're the most popular kid on this playground and just say whatever we think and let the chips fall where they may.