I Believed My Whole Life That The Moon Landing Was Real, Until I Saw This 12 Minute Video. Now I Know It Was Faked.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

I buy into what is real and true There is such a thing as radiation fields above the Earths atmosphere. Pity you only buy into what the Media tells you.

And the moon landing? Was that real and true?

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

And the moon landing? Was that real and true?

Well that depends on what the absolute truth is and what you regard as the truth.

[Jacuzzme]

Don’t people realize that faking this is simply not doable? The number of people involved in the lies and coverup would be in the thousands, tens of thousands even. You can’t keep a secret between 2 people, let alone hordes of them. Moon landing deniers are among the most gullible to have walked the earth. It’s a condition that many psychologists trace to childhood trauma, instilling a deeply seeded distrust.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Don’t people realize that faking this is simply not doable? The number of people involved in the lies and coverup would be in the thousands, tens of thousands even. You can’t keep a secret between 2 people, let alone hordes of them. Moon landing deniers are among the most gullible to have walked the earth. It’s a condition that many psychologists trace to childhood trauma, instilling a deeply seeded distrust.

People say that all the time. Once something is universally accepted and ingrained in history nothing can change the minds of the masses no matter how much definitive proof is shown. That's how the term "Conspiracy Theory" was born.

[VitaMan]

Anyone care to discuss the radiation from the sun in outer space ?


No air or atmosphere.....no clouds.....maybe a space suit helps.

[HoHound]

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

Anyone care to discuss the radiation from the sun in outer space ?


No air or atmosphere.....no clouds.....maybe a space suit helps.

If you are interested in that do some research then post a thread on that subject.

[eyecu2]

The Van Allen belts are a potential risk to human health, but the density of particle radiation is much lower than the plasma density of the plasmasphere and the neutral density within the Earth's atmosphere.
Astronauts' exposure to the Van Allen belts varies from mission to mission, but is generally much less than the standard set by the United States Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity. The total radiation received by astronauts is measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads, which is much less than the standard of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year.
The Apollo spacecraft avoided the more intense inner belts and minimized time spent in the outer belts to about 52 minutes. During this time, an unprotected astronaut would have been exposed to 11 rads, which is a small fraction of the lethal dose.

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

People say that all the time. Once something is universally accepted and ingrained in history nothing can change the minds of the masses no matter how much definitive proof is shown. That's how the term "Conspiracy Theory" was born.

They say that all the time because it’s true. This idiocy is even worse than the 911 truthers, and that’s a high bar.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

They say that all the time because it’s true. This idiocy is even worse than the 911 truthers, and that’s a high bar.

People who know the truth about many orchestrated events have come forth. They are then deemed crazy, Conspiracy Theorists, Tin Foil Hat wearers. Most people no matter how compelling other information is they will still align their beliefs with the official narrative, they are already programmed to believe it anyway. It's safer and less daunting to their egos and overall world view. Just last month a joint venture between SpaceX, NASA and Intuitive Machines launched an unmanned craft that supposedly landed on the Moon Feb 22nd. I saw minute or two of coverage. It's very cartoon like and fake as fuck.

[VitaMan]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

If you are interested in that do some research then post a thread on that subject.

You are not concerned about the radiation the sun emits when there is no atmosphere to shield it ?

You seem concerned about other radiation in outer space.

[VitaMan]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Well that depends on what the absolute truth is and what you regard as the truth.

This is a complete nonsensical post.
The truth is the truth.

Was there a moon landing or not would be the question here. Yes or no. There is no interpretation.

[VitaMan]

The OP is banned again. He only lasted a couple of weeks this time around.

No need to pursue this further on this site.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

You are not concerned about the radiation the sun emits when there is no atmosphere to shield it ?

You seem concerned about other radiation in outer space.

The Sun emits Solar Radiation. It's energy sent in all directions through space as Electromagnetic waves.

[Tigbitties38]

Only lead? Sorry charlie. Once again you show why your version of reality is filled with inaccuracies. You're living in a place that has a "matrix". An imaginary place.

Lead (when struck by space radiation radiation particles) generates more secondary particles (neutrons and other particles) and can be worse for the astronaut's health than the primary space radiation. The link below shows that the weight of lead isn't the most disqualifying property of that material.


"Problems with shields arise when space radiation particles interact with the atoms of the shield itself. These interactions lead to production of nuclear byproducts called secondaries (neutrons and other particles). If the shield isn’t thick enough to contain them, the secondaries that enter the spacecraft can be worse for astronauts’ health than the primary space radiation. Surprisingly, heavier elements such as lead produce more secondary radiation than lighter elements such as carbon and hydrogen.
Consequently, a great deal of research has been performed on a lightweight polyethylene plastic, called RFX1, which is composed entirely of lightweight carbon and hydrogen atoms.
Research shows that polyethylene is 50% better at shielding solar flares and is 15% better at shielding galactic cosmic radiation as compared to aluminum. Water is another hydrogen-rich molecule that can absorb radiation. However, the oxygen content in water makes it a lot heavier than polyethylene, and therefore is much more expensive to launch. Generally, lighter shields can greatly reduce the harmful effects of incoming space radiation particles, but they cannot completely stop them."

https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uplo...ce%20radiation.

Originally Posted by HoHound

Only lead can stop dangerous radiation, hence the lead apron at the dentist office. Only a lead space craft could have protected those astronauts from a 25 thousand mile radiation belt. Lead spaceships are too heavy to fly. But if you wanna stay in the matrix, be my guest. I will continue to enjoy the advantages of NOT living there. Enjoy your fantasies while you can.