BREAKING — Supreme Court rules Trump’s emergency tariffs ILLEGAL

[VitaMan]

Trump tried to use tariffs in a completely different random over reaching way than Nixon. The Supreme Court recognized that non of these could qualify as being needed under an emergency.


And they were correct.

[TechPapi]

'I can destroy the country': Trump's rant after Supreme Court strikes down his key policy

Originally Posted by Stupid cunt said

"They're just FOOLS and "LAPDOGS" for the RINOS (Republicans in name only) and Radical Left Democrats and, not that this should have anything to do with it, very unpatriotic, and disloyal to the Constitution," he wrote on Truth Social.
"It is my opinion that the Court has been swayed by Foreign Interests, and a Political Movement that is far smaller than people would think — But obnoxious, ignorant, and loud!"
Two of the justices who voted against the president - Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett - were appointed by him.
In a press conference, he spoke of his claimed powers as president.
"I can destroy the trade. I can destroy the country," Trump said.
"I'm allowed to impose a foreign destroying embargo, I can embargo, I can do anything I want, but I can't charge $1."
In a bizarre explanation, Trump said he "was very modest in my ask of other countries".
"I didn't want to do anything that would affect the decision of the court," he said.
"I wanted to be a good boy."
The administration is now left with the major headache of how to refund the $184 billion in tariffs it has already collected.

And all the maggies look at him and say, "this is our guy!" lol

[elghund]

This guy will never learn that fucking the American people over with taxes thinly disguised as supposed trade deficit bullshit will not work.

People are wising up to this scam. I wonder when the cowards in the GOP will take their Constitutional authority back from the insane freak in the White House……and stop shaking in their booties.


Trump hikes global tariff to 15 percent after ‘ridiculous’ Supreme Court ruling


https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...supreme-court/

He is using legislation Congress wrote for good reasons, but with rules. Trump is violating those rules right from the get go.

What are sections 122 and 301, Trump’s potential alternate tariff tools?

https://thehill.com/business/trade/5...s-section-301/

elg…

[rooster]

When I read this, I immediately thought of the most recent example of it....

Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

....
One thing that a Trump supporter with any decency should be ashamed of is Trump's childish below the belt insults directed at those he appointed for not voting in his favor....

And someone beat me to it and did a better job than I would have...

Originally Posted by TechPapi

'I can destroy the country': Trump's rant after Supreme Court strikes down his key policy

Originally Posted by Stupid cunt said
"They're just FOOLS and "LAPDOGS" for the RINOS (Republicans in name only) and Radical Left Democrats and, not that this should have anything to do with it, very unpatriotic, and disloyal to the Constitution," he wrote on Truth Social.
"It is my opinion that the Court has been swayed by Foreign Interests, and a Political Movement that is far smaller than people would think...."


And all the maggies look at him and say, "this is our guy!" lol

This is reaching a critical juncture. The blind fealty is becoming increasingly untolerated. MAGA is their own worst enemy at this point.

.

[CG2014]

CAVEAT EMPTOR:


NO REFUNDS

NO EXCHANGES

NO RETURNS

ALL PAYMENTS FINAL

[VitaMan]

Trump makes a mess of everything. And his mouth.....


Not many MAGAs chiming in anymore about how wonderful he is.

[Turner2099]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

the quote came from the CATO institute article i posted. and i did read it.


"The Supreme Court’s decision to strike down President Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs is a welcome victory for constitutional governance and the rule of law. But anyone hoping this spells the end of the administration’s tariff spree should think twice. Even without IEEPA, the president retains ample statutory authority to quickly recreate much of the current trade policy chaos."

https://www.cato.org/blog/supreme-co...-champagne-yet

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Even without IEEPA, the president retains ample statutory authority to quickly recreate much of the current trade policy chaos.

Yes, that's a big concern.

[pxmcc]

Trump, being the big spoiled brat that he is, says, "Well, I'll show you.." Levies, 1st, 10% tariffs, then, for no reason at all, jacks his tariffs up to 15%. More chaos, while the Republican Congress continues to abdicate its Constitutional responsibilities..

https://www.ms.now/news/trump-hikes-...e-court-ruling

sure was nice when we had an adult running the country instead of a pouty 4 year old..

his tariffs are good for 150 days. should be interesting to see what happens after that.

[TechPapi]

Originally Posted by pxmcc

Trump, being the big spoiled brat that he is, says, "Well, I'll show you.." Levies, 1st, 10% tariffs, then, for no reason at all, jacks his tariffs up to 15%. More chaos, while the Republican Congress continues to abdicate its Constitutional responsibilities..

https://www.ms.now/news/trump-hikes-...e-court-ruling

sure was nice when we had an adult running the country instead of a pouty 4 year old..

his tariffs are good for 150 days. should be interesting to see what happens after that.

It's super nice that he's doing all he can to make sure the GOP lose their asses in about 9 months.

[VitaMan]

Why does Trump say the foreign countries are paying the tariffs ?


The goods show up at our border. Then the importer has to pay the tariff to allow them into the country. Many times the cost of the tariff will be passed on to the American consumer.


Why don't the news organizations press him on this incorrect answer he gives ?