Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
That is the best thing ass wipe, when you get caught with you hand in the cookie jar blame someone else. You have always had a part of my old handle in your signature. Lately you and your butt boy have used it in it's entirety. You have posted many times about my boyfriends, but now that you have made a issue if the term "boy" you want to walk it back. Either put up or shut up dick breath.
You mean put up your toast to the mention of your boyfriends, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp?
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
They are your boyfriends, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp.
Or a reference to your old handle, Ekim the Inbred Chimp?
Yeah, because before the holocaust man had never been inhuman to his fellow man. The holocaust wasn't even the first genocide of the 20th century. Do a little research. Hint; look up the Congo and Turkey. Slavery can't be supported by shit. You can use those things to try and support it but that doesn't make it right.
I don't know what you were reading but it wasn't my post. As for your little tidbits; Which Congo? You should really say the Belgian Congo because that was the absolute atrocity under King Leopold II. I suppose you are talking about the Armenians when you mention Turkey. You should really say so. So many countries have done so much bad that you have to be specific. Want to go back further? Egypt under Ramses II came under attack by three waves of invaders from the sea. The first wave was slaughtered and consisted of soldiers. 15,000 foreskins were taken as proof. The second wave was soldiers and settlers. They too were slaughtered. The third wave was settlers and colonists (women and children), they were also slaughtered and take for slaves. Yes, that Ramses. We could talk about the Hebrew armies in the Levant and the peoples they slaughtered. Maybe the Australian aborigines are the only people that can say that they never slaughtered anyone.
I don't think America would exist without slavery. The slaves built this country and gave Americans the leg up it now enjoys today.
Sorry to post this but it's needed. ;-)
This is a rather stupid post. Imagine, if they couldn't have gotten slaves in North America the colonists would have just given up and went home or they would have stayed within 20 miles of the coast. How do you explain the colonies that were established without the help of slave labor? How about those railroads 200 years later that were built with imported (but not slave labor). Hell, the country would have been better off with no slavery ever. No civil war, no north and south division, no bloody border war out west...yep, it would have been paradise.
Sure my friend because explaining to you is like talking to a 2nd grader. I don't know the percentages and I certainly don't trust a word you say as I honestly consider you to be autistic in all sincerity. In all sincerity. However, perhaps it had everything to do with coming to a basically untapped resource in "America" and creating a society on the backs on slave labor whereas others just needed to work out the nuisances of an existing structure. ;-)
As you say, you don't know the percentages (at last, some truth). How about the history? When did slavery come to the colonies? By colony, I mean those 13 English colonies and not New Orleans, Florida, Canada, or Mexico (or Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, or Haiti). According to the sales logs the first African slaves came to Virginia in 1637. Now I point out that those were English colonies and not the United States. Spain and France had slavery before this. So the first African slaves were here in 1637 and the United States came into being in 1787. So for all that time England is to blame (just like you blame Bush for everything). Afterwards, the United States can be blamed....until 1861 when the south seceded. Slavery ended in 1866 in the United States. So for less than 100 years (89 if you're counting) the United States had slavery. So England, Spain, and France are more guilty than the United States and we inherited it.
Slavery is morally wrong. It always has been. Justifying it by saying "everyone's doing it" is the moral equivalent to "just following orders" at Auschwitz.
Discuss.
According to Obama, you should get off your high horse and stop judging.
