Trump vs Sports

[nevergaveitathought]

where is the news media and why aren't they hectoring the players with "do you disavow kaepernick?"

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You cited shit that doesn't refute anything I posted, speedy.

I edited my previous post. Absolutely no one supports your statement.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I edited my previous post. Absolutely no one supports your statement.

You are correct in asserting that you are indeed "no one", speedy, but while you stupidly attacked some imaginary argument regarding pages A62 and A63, speedy, you did shit to refute Rule 5, Article 8 in the NFL rule book which prohibits political messaging while on the field, speedy.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I edited my previous post.

Equivocating!

As for your "tea leaves" reading ...

..... and having "the pulse" of this country ...

Speedo
08-14-2016, 01:54 PM Post #103: Trump's ISIS reference to Obama and Hillary very disturbing

You should probably just stay on the bench, little boy.

Eat it!
https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...post1058516047

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You are correct in asserting that you are indeed "no one", speedy, but while you stupidly attacked some imaginary argument regarding pages A62 and A63, speedy, you did shit to refute Rule 5, Article 8 in the NFL rule book which prohibits political messaging while on the field, speedy.

They're not on the field, dipshit.

And you're no different than any other white supremacist motherfucker trying to infringe upon the rights of selected groups of Americans guaranteed by the fucking constitution!

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You are correct in asserting that you are indeed "no one", speedy, but while you stupidly attacked some imaginary argument regarding pages A62 and A63, speedy, you did shit to refute Rule 5, Article 8 in the NFL rule book which prohibits political messaging while on the field, speedy.

We have your OPINION as to whether or not Colin Kaepernick violated any NFL rules by taking a knee during the national anthem vs. the statements of the NFL that no such rules were broken. Obviously the NFL, who wrote the rule book, disagrees with your interpretation of Rule 5, Article 8.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

They're not on the field, dipshit.

And you're no different than any other white supremacist motherfucker trying to infringe upon the rights of selected groups of Americans guaranteed by the fucking constitution!

Once again you demonstrate you're too stupid to read and comprehend, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM, but it's fun to highlight each time you demonstrate your stupidity.

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

We have your OPINION as to whether or not Colin Kaepernick violated any NFL rules by taking a knee during the national anthem vs. the statements of the NFL that no such rules were broken. Obviously the NFL, who wrote the rule book, disagrees with your interpretation of Rule 5, Article 8.

The NFL hasn't been taken to court yet by a patron who is dissatisfied with how the NFL is not enforcing its own rules, speedy.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Equivocating!

As for your "tea leaves" reading ...

..... and having "the pulse" of this country ...



You should probably just stay on the bench, little boy.

Eat it!
https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...post1058516047

I was wrong on the first part of my statement. See how easy it is to admit when you are wrong. Many others, Republican and Democrat alike, on this forum doubted Trump's ability to win. You were wrong earlier today when you said that the protesters were not giving time and money to causes. Maybe someday you'll not only learn to be a little more compassionate but also learn how to admit when you're wrong.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The NFL hasn't been taken to court yet by a patron who is dissatisfied with how the NFL is not enforcing its own rules, speedy.

When that happens and the court rules that the protesters were violating what you believe are NFL rules, then I will say you are right. Until that time comes, you are wrong.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

When that happens and the court rules that the protesters were violating what you believe are NFL rules, then I will say you are right. Until that time comes, you are wrong.

You've been stupid since the moment you were dropped on your pointy head in the maternity ward, speedy, and will continue to be so into the foreseeable future. The NFL rule book was cited, speedy. You're just too damn stupid to understand that your BS rebuttals of "pages A62 and A63" haven't a damn thing to do with Rule 5, Article 8 on page 23 of the NFL rule book, speedy.

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Sorry! You'll have to get a demo from someone else. You get dispensing confused with use ... but its understandable. Juveniles like you really haven't had much "upbringing"!

Back to your disrespect for the United States of America.

Deflection is a typical lemming ploy.
Silly old fart you can't cite where I have .
Don't you have sharks to post, and threads to bump?

[nevergaveitathought]

the reasons the NFl didn't rely on their rule book was:

a. fear to be seen as racists, white supremacists as it were
b. their belief, or rather feeling, that the message the news media conveys is correct and representative of how the majority of American people would feel about these disrespectful acts -

about a. - so what, the people who accuse others of white supremacy are gonna hate no matter what

and b. there's still a substantial amount of right thinking people remaining even still in this country

still wanna know, if the kneeling isn't about what kaepernick started it as, where is the news media hectoring people about disavowing kaepernick?

[grean]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You've been stupid since the moment you were dropped on your pointy head in the maternity ward, speedy, and will continue to be so into the foreseeable future. The NFL rule book was cited, speedy. You're just too damn stupid to understand that your BS rebuttals of "pages A62 and A63" haven't a damn thing to do with Rule 5, Article 8 on page 23 of the NFL rule book, speedy.

The big difference is the NFL is a private organization. There rules are theirs to follow or not or bend as they please. They can do so at amy time and without notice.


It was not too long ago that only games in prime time had players on the field. The NFL started getting paid for its show of patriotism so it started having players come out for more games.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by grean

The big difference is the NFL is a private organization. There rules are theirs to follow or not or bend as they please. They can do so at amy time and without notice.


It was not too long ago that only games in prime time had players on the field. The NFL started getting paid for its show of patriotism so it started having players come out for more games.

The NFL is a business that advertises that it is in the entertainment business; hence, when it sells a ticket to a customer on the premise that that patron will be a spectator at a sports event, that patron has a right to sue when the NFL alters the terms of the contract and subjects him/her to an unwanted political protest.

[grean]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The NFL is a business that advertises that it is in the entertainment business; hence, when it sells a ticket to a customer on the premise that that patron will be a spectator at a sports event, that patron has a right to sue when the NFL alters the terms of the contract and subjects him/her to an unwanted political protest.

Nope.