Apparently, HIV Doesn't Cause AIDS

[CuteOldGuy]

LOL! If I'm a loser for posting here, what does that make you, who responds? LOL! This place gets funnier every day. Thanks, Sa_fartman.

[Mr. Bill]

More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges

In another defeat for AIDS propagandists, Louisiana prosecutors have dropped all HIV-related criminal charges against a Louisiana woman. According to attorney Jake Lemmon, Jefferson Parish prosecutors dropped all HIV-related charges against Magdalena Mays, despite a test that identified her as HIV+ in 2008.

Mays faced up to ten years of hard labor.


Magdalena Mays

The dismissal of HIV charges is part of a growing trend since OMSJ began to assist defendants in criminal HIV cases. In this 2009 case, Florida prosecutors reduced their initial offer of 15 years in state prison to five days of unsupervised probation.

“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”

A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies and leaves prosecutors scrambling for credible witnesses. OMSJ is currently assisting thirty other cases in the US and Canada.

HIV testing is a problem that NIAID Director Anthony Fauci continues to ignore. The NIAID and CDC, receive billions of dollars annually to fight infectious disease – even though infectious disease became statistically irrelevant in the US by 1955.

While recipients of HIV funding rely on inflated political estimates, evidence-based medical reports from Europe (2), Australia and South Africa [2007]) corroborate the irrelevance of HIV infection. Without the unjustified fear of infectious disease, Congress would have a hard time explaining the billions spent to fight it. H1N1 is one of the more recent scandals.

Compared to the preventable “adverse drug reactions” (ADRs) that kill and injure millions of Americans each year, alleged HIV mortality is almost non-existent except in self-serving estimates and racial profiling that targets homosexual and black Americans with gay activists and black celebrities.

In recent years, those drugs killed thousands including Martin Delany, Hank Wilson, Ferd Eggan, Belynda Dunn, Joe Carroccio, George Sanderson, Howard Jacobs and Joyce Hafford. Their decision to accept HIV treatments were based entirely upon the HIV tests that prosecutors cannot competently defend.

Since 2004, the pharmaceutical industry has paid $7 billion to settle criminal and civil complaints.

.

[Mr. Bill]

The United States v. Corporal RL

MCB 29 Palms – On Friday, a Court-martial Convening Authority (CMCA) dismissed all charges against a US Marine accused of exposing a sexual partner to HIV.

His freedom almost didn’t happen.

The United States v. Corporal RL

Until these charges were filed, Corporal RL had maintained an unblemished military record during his four years of service as a United States Marine. Investigators accused him of violating Articles 92 (failure to obey order or regulation), 107 (false official statement), 125 (sodomy), and 128 (assault) under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). His military career, livelihood and freedom was in jeopardy.



When OMSJ learned of the charges against Cpl. RL in February, 2011, its founder and director, Clark Baker, met with Marine Corps officials at the Headquarter’s Marine Corps Naval Annex (Arlington VA) to discuss the case. With their support, Baker assembled a team that included civilian counsel, a medical doctor and a biotechnology scientist. His team coordinated their efforts with Inv. Carolyn Martin, three military attorneys and one civilian attorney at MCB 29 Palms.

But before they secured RL’s complete medical record, prosecutors scheduled a preliminary hearing (called an Article 32), which was heard in May 2011 without OMSJ’s team. At that hearing, prosecutors produced a printout of RL’s alleged HIV test results and a doctor’s consultation statement to “verbally advise any prospective sexual partner that (he is) HIV positive.” The medical consultation was signed and provided to Cpl. RL by a military doctor, a Navy Lieutenant Commander.

Based upon the evidence, the Article 32 Investigation Officer (IO) recommended to the Convening Authority that charges should be referred at a general court-martial. These charges included numerous HIV-related offenses that included sexual assault likely to produce great bodily injury. If convicted at a general court-martial, Cpl RL faced a felony conviction of life in prison, reduction to the lowest rank, a dishonorable discharge, required registration as a sex offender, revocation of his immigrant status and deportation.

Because of the seriousness of the charges, Cpl. RL’s defense team reached out to OMSJ and a military judge granted a motion to re-open the Article 32 Investigation.

HIV Innocence Group

Because of Congress’ failure to clean up the widespread corruption that permeates the Pharmaceutical Industry and Health and Human Services’ (HHS), OMSJ’s HIV Innocence Group (HIG) was established to assist attorneys and those accused of HIV-related criminal offenses. OMSJ’s involvement compels prosecution “HIV experts” (usually incompetent clinicians and university professors who receive pharmaceutical kickbacks) to answer questions that HHS agencies like the CDC, FDA and NIH refuse to answer.

Since 2009, OMSJ has helped defense attorneys secure dismissals and plea bargains in 30 cases throughout the US. Defense attorneys who have accepted assistance have not lost a single case.

OMSJ is currently involved in about 50 active criminal, civil and military HIV cases – including the appeal of USAF Sgt. David Gutierrez, who was convicted of similar charges in January 2011. In that case, Gutierrez’ defense team deliberately compromised the case by refusing to challenge the prosecution expert witness, who could not clear her client without exposing herself and her clinic to millions of dollars in potential malpractice liability.

Weeks after she testified against him, she received a $2.9 million “grant” from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) – the maker of a highly-addictive psychotropic HIV drug that, according to Gutierrez’ own medical records, was unnecessarily prescribed to him. When the prescription is interrupted, the drug produces severe withdrawal symptoms that clinicians use to identify the onset of “full-blown AIDS.”

A multi-state lawsuit now alleges that BMS paid kickbacks to doctors who prescribe BMS medications – one of many illegal marketing practices that has resulted in thousands of fatalities and more than $9 billion in fines to the pharmaceutical industry since 2004. Anderson Cooper recently explained how drug companies get away with murder.

HIV Clinic Incompetence



One month after Gutierrez’ conviction, OMSJ learned that military prosecutors planned to use the case as an example of how to conduct HIV prosecutions throughout the military – including the charges against Cpl. RL.

As RL’s medical records trickled in, OMSJ found many of the same failures they found in Sgt. Gutierrez’ medical record. Like Gutierrez, RL had no symptoms of HIV infection, nor was there any verifiable evidence that anyone had ever competently diagnosed RL. Although the ten vaccinations RL received since 2005 contain toxins that are known to compromise immune function, injure, cripple, and kill patients – and cause false-positive HIV results – none of RL’s physicians made any attempt to ascertain whether the vaccinations had caused the various health complaints that RL suffered during his career. Instead, they ignored the known adverse reactions to the vaccines and treated him with 21 different drugs that cause their own adverse reactions. In a sworn affidavit, OMSJ’s medical expert summarized:

“There was a general lack of organization in the records. There is no correlation between laboratory reports and patient visits and there seems to have been no attempt made by his practitioners to enter into their notes or follow-up on any tests ordered. There was a profound and disturbing lack of continuity between visits… At one point, Cpl. RL had a 40-pound weight gain that went unnoticed. He had persistently elevated blood pressure and tachycardia. The blood pressure was noted but never acted on and the tachycardia was not even noted. He was seen multiple times for various somatic complaints… (His) history demonstrates obvious classic chronic stress symptoms (persistent elevated blood pressure and tachycardia, rapid weight gain and multiple somatic complaints) that remained oblivious to his pantheon of treating professionals.

“With regard to the mismanagement of his medications and possible creation of iatrogenic diseases, Cpl. RL was given zolmitriptan for headaches on March 19, 2010. One side effect of this drug is a fast pounding or irregular heartbeat. RL’s heart rate recorded that day was 96 but had been as high as 132 during a subsequent visit on Dec. 2, 2009. No consideration was given to the possible aggravation of this long standing but unrecognized problem. He was then prescribed zofran and fiorocet on August 16, 2010. One of the side effects of zofran is headaches, even though his presenting complaint had been headache and stomach pains. One of the side effects of fiorocet is tachycardia, again with the possible aggravation of this untreated symptom. On August 30, 2010, Cpl. RL was still complaining of a headache and he was given sumatriptan.

“The question was never raised that he might be having a reaction to the zofran. Instead he was diagnosed with migraines and referred to a neurologist.”

Because of these and other questions issues raised about the May hearing, a new Investigation Officer (IO) re-examined the case – this time with OMSJ as part of the defense team.

Having reviewed RL’s complete medical record, OMSJ’s team was now ready. Because the multiple charges relied on the competent diagnosis of his alleged infection, prosecutors called Cpl. RL’s doctor as their first witness.

The prosecution’s case began to unravel when RL’s physycian – the Department Head of the HIV section at Naval Medical Center, San Diego – admitted that his order for RL to sign this admission of HIV infection was not actually a military order.


Under OMSJ’s cross examination, the HIV expert admitted:

• He never tested the Marine;
• He was unsure about CDC testing guidelines;
• He didn’t follow CDC guidelines that he disagreed with;
• He failed to rule out more than fifty factors that he acknowledged are known to cause false positive HIV test reactions, and;
• That the Marine’s alleged victim never tested positive.

The HIV expert admittedly had no idea who or how blood samples were collected in his Department; how they were packaged, stored, transported, received or tested when delivered to the testing facility. Although prosecutors and courts require proof regarding this kind of “continuity of evidence,” the HIV expert acknowledge that he had no information about it – basic facts that most prosecutors require for simple urine and blood tests.

After hearing testimony from the witnesses that included the investigating NCIS Agent, the IO recommended to the Convening Authority to dismiss all charges.

One week later, the Convening Authority concurred.

The HIV Scam

Since 1987, the pharmaceutical industry has paid politicians, academics and activists to promote the HIV-related conviction of men like Willie Campbell, Philippe Padieu, Christopher Gray, Nushawn Williams and Andre Parenzee.

Since 2009, OMSJ has consistently demonstrated that these convictions require 1) an irrational faith that clinicians like RL’s doctor know how to diagnose HIV in patients, and 2) defense attorneys who don’t know how to question doctors and academics.

Defendants who can afford a medical doctor to testify on their behalf are forced to rely on experts who are unwilling to risk their careers by telling the truth. Because unreliable HIV testing and diagnosis has become the medical “standard of care,” clinicians who expose the incompetence are routinely threatened by universities and hospitals that profit from preventable errors and complication. To protect their profits, they empanel “medical peer review boards” comprised of complicit doctors who discredit and destroy offending physicians (see Waite, Chalifoux, Kirby).

Whether or not OMSJ’s success has anything to do with recent Obama Administration and Congressional demands to end the prosecution of HIV patients for “humanitarian reasons,” it’s hard to ignore the timing of requests that began within months of OMSJ’s first depositions of “HIV experts” like RL’s doctor.

Regardless, OMSJ has demonstrated that HIV doctors, clinics and hospitals pose a much greater public danger than HIV ever did.

UPDATE: Of OMSJ’s success, USMC Capt. Eldon Beck wrote:

“Our success in challenging the HIV issues in our case is largely due to Clark Baker (a former Marine, retired LAPD investigator, and licensed CA PI), Baron Coleman (a young civilian lawyer with expertise challenging HIV prosecutions), and other members of Clark’s team at the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice (OMSJ). Without them, we would not have been able to effectively challenge the HIV testing, chain of custody, and alleged diagnosis of our client… You should contact (OMSJ) immediately if you are detailed to an HIV-related case.”

UPDATE: OMSJ also prevailed in the Jason Young Case, bringing OMSJ’s record to 34-0. OMSJ Director Clark Baker discusses both cases (audio MP3) during the second hour of the Robert Scott Bell Show.

.

[MrKlean]

"HIV" is a virus....."Human immunodeficiency Virus"

"AIDS" is a syndrome. A syndrome is a group of symptoms or findings.
"Acquired immunodeficiency Syndrome"

When a person contracts HIV, the virus attacks a part of your immune system (CD4 cells).

When the virus has killed the majority of these cells, the person becomes susceptible to many illnesses seen only in patients that have a very weak immune system (immunodeficiency).

The definition of "AIDS" is when the CD4 count is less than 200.
This is the time when patients infected develop infections that normally do not occur in healthy individuals (MAI pneumonia and Thrush).

The law says that if a person has "AIDS" they must inform their sexual partner.

If the person has "HIV" and their CD4 count is above 200, they DO NOT have to inform their sexual partner ( Remember that the definition of "AIDS" is a CD4 count less than 200).

The reasons that the people in these stories "got off" was because they didn't technically break the law.

What they did do is transmit HIV knowingly to someone else.

People who have contracted HIV and receive medical treatment can live normal lives as long as their CD4 counts remain above 200 (Magic Johnson).

People who contract HIV and DO NOT receive treatment WILL eventually get AIDS!

Pm for more info or questions regarding above.

There is truth regarding the media's influence on society's view of HIV/AIDS and who and how many are affected.

Many people quote studies that have have many flaws and biases which make them difficult to interpret, thus there significance or validity should be questioned.

Please take what one reads on the Internet as "information found on the Internet."

Medical information and questions should be answered by your private physician or "QUALIFIED" medical personnel.

Many times medical information can be miscommunicated secondary to misunderstandings of the definitions of terms used.

Hope this helps.

KR

[Mr. Bill]

Originally Posted by KRiggins

"HIV" is a virus....."Human immunodeficiency Virus"

HIV is purportedly a retrovirus (a harmless one). It has never been photographed, it has never been isolated in human blood from any AIDS patient and it has never been proven to be the cause of AIDS.

"AIDS" is a syndrome. A syndrome is a group of symptoms or findings.
"Acquired immunodeficiency Syndrome"

AIDS is (today) whatever the CDC and WHO decides to call it. AIDS is caused by drug usage, malnutrition, and/or poisonous AIDS meds.

When a person contracts HIV, the virus attacks a part of your immune system (CD4 cells).

There is no reliable test for HIV.

When the virus has killed the majority of these cells, the person becomes susceptible to many illnesses seen only in patients that have a very weak immune system (immunodeficiency).

A virus, especially a passenger virus does not kill its host cells.

The definition of "AIDS" is when the CD4 count is less than 200.
This is the time when patients infected develop infections that normally do not occur in healthy individuals (MAI pneumonia and Thrush).

The definition of AIDS changes every year according to the whims of the CDC and WHO. The definition currently includes many historically well-known diseases; for example, if a person has cervical cancer, tuberculosis, or they're undernourished - and they test HIV positive - they are classified as having AIDS. The definition of AIDS also varies from country to country.

Equally important with respect to CD4 counts, the technology Flow Cytometry used to count CD4 cells has never been proven to be accurate. And no studies have been conducted that produce baselines of what can be considered normal. Even the Director of NIAID, Anthony Fauci publicly doubts the efficacy of CD4 counts.

The law says that if a person has "AIDS" they must inform their sexual partner.

The laws are different from state to state. If a person is charged with an HIV crime, they are innocent until proven guilty.

If the person has "HIV" and their CD4 count is above 200, they DO NOT have to inform their sexual partner ( Remember that the definition of "AIDS" is a CD4 count less than 200).

There are no references to T-cell count pertaining to any legal statutes for HIV that I could find.

The reasons that the people in these stories "got off" was because they didn't technically break the law.

Correct. HIV and crime shouldn't even be in the same sentence. The medical mafia is getting bad publicity over this very issue right now; they know their position is indefensible in a courtroom. This is why big pharma lobbyists currently seek to abolish all HIV criminality in the US.

What they did do is transmit HIV knowingly to someone else.

HIV is not transmissible, nor is there any test to detect it, or any proof that it adversely affects the health of anyone.

People who have contracted HIV and receive medical treatment can live normal lives as long as their CD4 counts remain above 200 (Magic Johnson).

People diagnosed with HIV can, and have lived healthy lives - so long as they don't take AIDS drugs. Magic Johnson doesn't have HIV/AIDS; he's a marketing agent for the pharmaceutical companies.

People who contract HIV and DO NOT receive treatment WILL eventually get AIDS!

Incorrect. There are thousands of people who have been diagnosed as having AIDS, yet they are not HIV positive. There are just as many people who were tested HIV positive 20 years ago and have never developed AIDS. Many have now tested negative. Those who did develop AIDS (and died) took the AIDS drugs.

Pm for more info or questions regarding above.

There is truth regarding the media's influence on society's view of HIV/AIDS and who and how many are affected.

Yep, that's for sure.

Many people quote studies that have have many flaws and biases which make them difficult to interpret, thus there significance or validity should be questioned.

Namely, the entire mainstream HIV/AIDS community at large.

Please take what one reads on the Internet as "information found on the Internet."

Yes - here are some more information sources to access:

- http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...kZHQ&vq=medium
- http://exlibhollywood.blogspot.com/2...allos-egg.html
- http://aras.ab.ca/index.php
- http://hivskeptic.wordpress.com/
- http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
- http://www.virusmyth.com/
- http://www.whale.to/aids.html
- http://www.youtube.com/user/hivquestions/featured

Medical information and questions should be answered by your private physician or "QUALIFIED" medical personnel.

Physicians rely upon dogma perpetuated by the controlled scientific literature, and/or they are coerced to medicate (rather than think) via incentives from pharmaceutical companies.

Many times medical information can be miscommunicated secondary to misunderstandings of the definitions of terms used.

Yep, doctors themselves have been misled.

Hope this helps.

KR

.

[MrKlean]

The source of information may sometimes skew the information.

A "retrovirus" is termed that based on how it replicates. It has nothing to do with if a virus is harmful or not. HIV causes the body harm by destroying a portion of the immune system (CD4 cells).

This part of your immune system is responsible for defending your body from many different things. It has been found that it assists your body in destroying defective cells in your body that will not stop growing (cancer).

Cervical cancer that is highly agressive is not often observed in healthy women. There was an emergence of this type of cervical cancer and it was found that many of these individuals also were HIV positive, which linked a particular type of cervical cancer with HIV.

The HIV virus has been photographed and isolated. Otherwise, how would we know about it? The entire genome (genetic makeup) of the virus is now known. The human genome was completed over 10 years ago.

There are 2 types of test for HIV, one that is a screening test and one that actually confirms infection. The test does that by actually growing the virus. The test will also tell how many virus particles are in the blood (viral load). This is how doctors determine if a particular HIV drug is effective or if the medication should be discontinued.

HIV is a retrovirus. Passenger viruses infect cells but do not immediately kill the cells they infected. Key word is immediate. Viruses are unable to reproduce by themselves. Virus's use the cells they infect to help them reproduce. The virus replicates until there are so many virus particles inside of the cell that the cells burst (and dies....thus is harmful) and releases all o the newly formed viruses.

Most times, this process takes years to complete, which is why many people can be affected and have no clinical signs or symptoms.

Many people think that HIV and AIDS are the same thing. They are not. AIDS is a syndrome which is a group of symptoms seen with certain medical diagnoses. So yes it is true that people can have AIDS from other diseases that decreases the function of a person's immune system. The point is that there are numerous conditions that can cause AIDS, HIV is just one of them.

I will finish with these facts.

HIV is a virus that is very transmissible (Most bodily fluids).

People with HIV that do not get treated, can lead normal lives for a period of time, but when the HIV infection decreases the immune system to the point that the CD4 count is less than 200, the patient will then get "opportunistic infections" and have AIDS

Unless one gets a medical text and really studies this topic, they may misunderstand or misinterprete any information that they read from the Internet (This includes directors who may not have ANY medical background)

Contact your physician to discuss ANY medically related topic.

For many, it is only when people get really sick that they believe what doctors advise.
This is also the time that they will seek medical help and care.
If one believes in doctors during times of severe illness, why not believe in them all the time.

My posts are only designed to educate.

With Topics of this magnitude, incorrect information or the beliefs of the minority of the WORLD, should not be presented as FACTUAL!

If there is doubt of HIV, talk to the people in Africa that this disease is greatly affecting.

Lastly, put "photograph of HIV" into google search and see what one finds.

The reliable test for HIV is called "Western Blot".

Any terms used in this post can be searched and defined in google.

KR

[Mr. Bill]

Not only myself, but thousands of scientists and doctors all over the world disagree with you.

The pretty colorful images of HIV popular to media are speculative artist renditions. There are no photos of an HIV virus.



Here is the original 1984 letter that Dr. Gonda sent back to Robert Gallo after searching for the mysterious (and invisible) HTLV (now called HIV); Gallo asked Gonda to take some photos of it. Gonda found no trace of a so-called virus in Gallo's blood samples.



Had you gotten your information from anywhere other than the TV or government policy, you would understand there are no reliable HIV tests, period.

AIDS drugs do one thing - kill, nothing more, period. They should be outlawed; in fact they were at one time.

Viruses are fast acting; they manifest themselves in days, weeks; not years.

HIV is a fraud based on faulty science and a political agenda to depopulate Africa - at the expense of millions of lives in America and in other countries.

The diseases affecting Africans are the same diseases which have always been on the continent. The only difference is now these diseases have been classified as AIDS. The people in Africa need clean water, better living/working conditions and nutritional food; not deadly AIDS drugs that further destroy their immune system and kill them.

Your posts only misinform people - and help perpetuate the genocide of the human race.

.

[Mr. Bill]

AIDS in Africa

Since about 1995, Americans have been told that AIDS is ravaging Africa. As a result, billions of dollars have been sent to Africa’s third-world leaders through Congress and NGOs to fight what researchers insist is a “global pandemic” (i.e., everyone will catch it).

After the discovery of diamonds, gold and other precious jewels in the late 19th century and the explosion of the mining industry in South Africa and throughout the African continent, the universities of Cape Town and Johannesburg lead research into mine-related lung diseases for nearly a century. Researchers found that, regardless of geography, humans who regularly inhale mine dust eventually succumb to fatal diseases like silicosis, asbestosis, pneumoconiosis, and tuberculosis. They also learned that humans who drink water polluted by heavy metals and toxins will eventually succumb to disease.

Today, more than 1500 international mining companies operate thousands of mines throughout Africa at a fraction of the cost that those companies would pay in places like the US and Europe. If we compare the cost to hire one US miner ($15,000K/mo) to the cost of hiring illiterate children from countries like Malawi and Nigeria (~$80/mo), the value of these mining operations to the global market is undeniable.

But despite what we’re told, there is little evidence of an HIV epidemic in Africa. Official government statistics from Europe (2), Australia and South Africa [2007] show that actual HIV-related mortality is a tiny fraction of one percent of the overall populations. Throughout the so-called pandemic, the African population doubled from 400 million to 800 million. Paradoxically, UN concerns about Africa’s overpopulation conflicts directly with mortality ESTIMATES that researchers admit are exaggerated (more links here). When Rian Malan investigated HIV mortality for Rolling Stone magazine in 2001, he found almost no evidence.

As OMSJ reported, virtually all lung-disease research was abruptly replaced during the mid-1990s after miners filed a class-action lawsuit against the mining giant AngloAmerican. When the lawsuit threatened the collapse of the international mining industry, funding for lung-disease treatment and research disappeared virtually overnight. In its place, millions of dollars in AIDS research funding flooded research centers.

Today, companies like AVGold, AngloGold, Gold Field, AngloAmerican and RandGold promote aggressive HIV/AIDS testing and treatment programs under a humanitarian pretext. So when workers gets sick from lung diseases, company clinicians convince these illiterate miners that they forgot to wear condoms, have contracted HIV and need medications.
When they die, their mortality is used to corroborate claims that HIV ravages the African continent.

When people get sick near a mine in the United States, companies like WR Grace pay billions to settle claims. However in Africa, where thousands of mining operations generate few complaints of hazardous waste and pollutants, activists and CDC officials are dispatched to test and treat local victims for HIV.

The United States cannot withdraw from Africa because of the scheme’s strategic value. After all, how does the US compete in the global market if we mine defense materials like gold and platinum for $15,000 per laborer and leave countries like China and Russia to mine the same materials at $80 per miner?

From a strategic viewpoint, America’s economic and strategic survival depends upon our material claims in Africa. Those claims depend almost entirely on the mythology of HIV that OMSJ’s HIV Innocence Group will continue to challenge.

related: http://exlibhollywood.blogspot.com/2...ting-dots.html

.

[Mr. Bill]

Another MD Busts AIDS Clerics

Since 2006, Mexican cartels have killed 28,000 men, women and children in drug-related violence. As troubling as these numbers are, those deaths and injuries represent a fraction of those who are negligently killed or injured by US doctors and drug companies every year. Based upon admissions information, 3,607,000 patients suffered adverse drug reactions in 1994 alone.



Unlike the Mexican police forces that stage captured suspects and their profits before the international media, the pharmaceutical industry routinely pays off regulators, prosecutors and victims for their silence. Since 2004, companies like GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Pfizer have paid $8 billion to settle thousands of criminal and civil complaints after killing or injuring millions. But when a drug like Seroquel generates $4 billion/year, a $520 million fine becomes nothing more than a business expense.

To facilitate America’s progressive eugenics, drug companies pay basketball players and actors to push deadly drugs – especially in black and gay communities. But when licensed investigators and scientists question those efforts, PharmaSluts like and Jeanne Bergman rent their unused diplomas to give legitimacy to the criminal enterprise while attacking real scientists and reporters with harassing letters, gay porn and meritless complaints.

Unfortunately for Bergman and her peers, another real doctor has broken ranks with what Shannon Brownlee identifies as drug whores.

Unlike Bergman, Nancy Turner Banks MD has actually practiced medicine and treated patients for 28 years. The Harvard Medical School graduate trained in surgery, obstetrics, gynecology and gynecological oncology and has practiced general obstetrics and gynecology for twenty-five years. She also earned an MBA in finance.

In her recently published book AIDS, Opium, Diamonds and Empire, Dr. Banks exposes the AIDS religion for the pseudoscience that it is:

It is a great mistake to think that wars only concern armies, regulars or guerillas, involved in active engagement—blowing people and things to smithereens. In today’s world, nothing could be farther from the truth. The real forces of evil wage another kind of warfare. This warfare is principally financial. The dark princes of debt finance have gained practically unopposed leverage over every important social, economic and political institution, including and especially the health care delivery system. As a result, death by iatrogenic medicine kills more people in a year than either cancer or heart disease. The demons of capital and “free market” ideology have gained control of the pharmaceutical industry, the teaching of physicians, the major media, including medical journals and the flow of research dollars. They control a clandestine intelligence agency, the Epidemic Intelligence Service that has silently infiltrated every major health department, hospital, newspaper and medical journal across the nation enabling the control of information and the mounting of a consolidated response on a moments notice. These dollars determine if there is going to be a “war on cancer” or a “war on AIDS.” These wars are planned and mounted with the same organizational strategic planning as the Pentagon. What this ultimately leads to is the development of bad science and toxic drugs that are created ostensibly to fight cancer and AIDS, but in effect cause more cancer and more AIDS—and that is the point of the war. People die in war and the profiteers substantially increase their wealth and power.

Dr. Banks draws the connections between free market strategies, the destruction of national sovereignty by the process of globalization, and AIDS as one of the health consequences of a neo-Darwinian philosophy. Through meticulous research, Banks found a medical-pharmaceutical- industrial complex that was taken over one hundred years ago by the titans of financial capitalism. Their aim was to create profit – not to conquer disease. This book of social history points to a cauldron of historical events that contributed to the HIV/AIDS crisis.

AIDS, Opium, Diamonds, and Empire tells the dramatic story of a financial ideology that is damaging to everything that it means to be human. It is the story of profits over people. In the end, it is the story of hope and how we can regain our sanity and our health in a world gone mad.



Check out Dr. Nancy Banks' 15 minute interview!


.

[Mr. Bill]

Liberation from HIV Test Fraud

It may come as a shock to realize that if everyone in the world who was supposed to be HIV positive, suddenly no longer cared about this designation, and returned the diagnosis and red ribbon to the doctor or clinician who gave it to them, that no further infections would occur, no HIV would be spread, and the entire notion of this virus would disappear entirely.

What would be left in this scenario is not a world plagued by HIV infection, but a world in which many people are ill for many reasons: Poverty, pharmaceutical poisoning, street drug abuse, toxic environmental poisoning, pure starvation, filthy parasite-ridden water and fear. A fear promulgated and propagated by the AIDS medical front.

Here's the video documentary release from the “House of Numbers” special edition film series – “HIV Testing Exposed, Revealed and Deconstructed.”



YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE
Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/32537863

What are HIV tests? What do they do?

They are protein tests – they look for reactions between proteins in the test kits, and proteins in your blood.

But where do the proteins come from? The answer will astound, and possibly liberate you, and anyone you know who has ever been given one of these fraudulent tests.

You'll hear from AIDS industry and medical experts, who in their own words reveal in no uncertain terms that HIV tests are a complete and utter fraud – a game of three-card-monty, that overlay a cult-like belief system, a myth – the myth that AIDS is a transmissible sex disease.

AIDS – acquired immune deficiency – is real enough, and easy to ‘acquire’ through many means – through drug, pharma, water, food poisoning; through prolonged intoxication with chemicals, or restriction of essential nutrients.

But while immune deficiency is quite real, HIV is entirely fake. Does this statement surprise you? Shock you?

The HIV test was constructed out of entirely normal proteins, that occur in both sick and healthy people. These proteins were supposed to come from one virus – but they come from a witch’s brew of cultured, contaminated cell lines in government laboratories, which had been growing for most of the 1970s. They were useless proteins looking for an illness to attach themselves to. Why? To keep the funding going.

The CDC was saved from destitution by the invention of the “HIV” paradigm. The World Health Organization has grown into a world policing, economic weapon of war, in light of their ability to ruin nations with make-believe “HIV” tests, (and the SARS, Bird and Swine flu tests that followed suit). Much of the ‘third world’ has been made into pharma slave states, because we have been given this profoundly effective myth: That sex is dangerous for some people, and so they must be tested.

But what are we testing them with, and what for?

Here's the video documentary release from the “House of Numbers” special edition film series – “HIV Testing Exposed, Revealed and Deconstructed.”



YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE
Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/32537863

You will hear Hans Gelderblom, electron microscopist, admit on camera that what became HIV tests, was from the beginning, “Eighty Percent Dirt.” You will hear Ph.D. researchers describe the invention (by fiat, and consensus agreement) of “HIV proteins,” out of normally-occuring cellular proteins. And you will hear the high priests of “HIV,” Robert Gallo, Luc Montagnier and their peers, describe HIV tests as entirely flawed Rube Goldberg devices – one leading to another, leading to another, all in an attempt to create an overwhelming conclusion that a dozen useless tests must be more meaningful than just one.

When they know the truth: A dozen times a fraud is an even more profound fraud – and this fraud is now being perpetrated against Africans, Indians, Chinese, Eastern and Western Europeans, South and North Americans, and citizens worldwide, with entirely disgraced ‘rapid tests,’ now used in vans and at folding tables in parking lots, to grab the poorly-educated and hurl them into the pharmaceutical maw.

Watch this show, and the House of Numbers exclusive HIV testing video, walk it into your clinician, your doctor, your school, workplace, your CEO or C.O.’s office; bring it to social studies, science and math classes, discourse and debate clubs; post them on your webpage and blogs, burn them onto CDs and MP3 players, and spread the word.

Turn in your HIV test result. Return it to the manufacturer. After all, they’ll tell you in the fine print that it is a ‘diagnosis’ with no value at all. And begin to reclaim your life, sanity, and your sexual identity – it is not the government’s right or responsibility to decide for you how you shall choose a partner, nor how you shall be drugged.

Take this information, and spread the well-described and understood reality of HIV testing: It is an absolute, irredeemable fraud. And if you are ill, and have any kind of immune deficiency, your challenge is to slowly but concretely educate yourself about the illnesses that plague us in our modern world. Illnesses of toxic exposure, from denatured and chemically altered food, polluted water and air, and chronic exposure to gut-rending pharmaceuticals.

Here's the video documentary release from the “House of Numbers” special edition film series – “HIV Testing Exposed, Revealed and Deconstructed.”



YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE
Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/32537863

This video includes all nine House of Numbers special feature mini-documentaries on HIV Testing from the Deluxe Edition DVD:

- HIV Testing 101
- False Positives: Causes and Factors
- History and Evolution of HIV Testing
- Reading the Fine Print: HIV Test Inserts
- The Changing Criteria of Western Blot Testing
- Deciphering Test Results for False Positives
- Examining the "Gold Standard"
- Rapid Testing in High Risk vs. Low Risk Populations
- HIV Testing Campaigns

.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by Mr. Bill

More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges

In another defeat for AIDS propagandists, Louisiana prosecutors have dropped all HIV-related criminal charges against a Louisiana woman. According to attorney Jake Lemmon, Jefferson Parish prosecutors dropped all HIV-related charges against Magdalena Mays, despite a test that identified her as HIV+ in 2008.

Mays faced up to ten years of hard labor.


Magdalena Mays

The dismissal of HIV charges is part of a growing trend since OMSJ began to assist defendants in criminal HIV cases. In this 2009 case, Florida prosecutors reduced their initial offer of 15 years in state prison to five days of unsupervised probation.

“We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”

A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies and leaves prosecutors scrambling for credible witnesses. OMSJ is currently assisting thirty other cases in the US and Canada.

HIV testing is a problem that NIAID Director Anthony Fauci continues to ignore. The NIAID and CDC, receive billions of dollars annually to fight infectious disease – even though infectious disease became statistically irrelevant in the US by 1955.

While recipients of HIV funding rely on inflated political estimates, evidence-based medical reports from Europe (2), Australia and South Africa [2007]) corroborate the irrelevance of HIV infection. Without the unjustified fear of infectious disease, Congress would have a hard time explaining the billions spent to fight it. H1N1 is one of the more recent scandals.

Compared to the preventable “adverse drug reactions” (ADRs) that kill and injure millions of Americans each year, alleged HIV mortality is almost non-existent except in self-serving estimates and racial profiling that targets homosexual and black Americans with gay activists and black celebrities.

In recent years, those drugs killed thousands including Martin Delany, Hank Wilson, Ferd Eggan, Belynda Dunn, Joe Carroccio, George Sanderson, Howard Jacobs and Joyce Hafford. Their decision to accept HIV treatments were based entirely upon the HIV tests that prosecutors cannot competently defend.

Since 2004, the pharmaceutical industry has paid $7 billion to settle criminal and civil complaints.

.

I have a question.
If you are tested positive for HIV, who doesn’t get retested? Who risks their life long health on treatments they can’t afford without getting a second test they can’t afford? I wouldn’t get off that easy. Because if I got a + and then a -, it looks like best 2 out of 3.

Prosecutors lose cases because of procedural mistakes all the time. What kind of science calls 30 data points a trend? If the test is valid in all respects (repetitions, conditions of use, etc.), no one has to lie. Chain of evidence is chain of evidence. They will get on the stand and recite a litany similar to any scientific evidence. Unless you are an original researcher, you don’t have to argue accepted methods. In the case of the Marine, those were procedural errors, not science errors.

In an article (copy and pasted into Word to get a word count), placed into a Word document 9 pages long, 5200 words plus long on the subject of fines the pharmaceutical companies pay, you see what generated $7 billion in fines. Pretty sordid stuff. But there is one thing missing.

A single mention of any HIV/AIDS drugs. Mis-marketing, mis-prescribed, or misused.

When compared to Lipitor or Viagra, the revenue the “AIDS cocktails” generate won’t come close to paying the advertising bill for the first 2 I mentioned.

Since the statement “Since 2004, the pharmaceutical industry has paid $7 billion to settle criminal and civil complaints.” has nothing to do with the post it was in, isn’t that an attempt at muddying the water? Of course it is. If you didn’t read all 5200 words, you would assume aids drugs were prominently mentioned.

The vast majority of ADRs are preventable only by not giving the drugs in the first place or by pre-testing. If it is tough to find true HIV results, how do you find those 2 people out of a thousand that die when put under a general anesthesia?

[Mr. Bill]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I have a question.
If you are tested positive for HIV, who doesn’t get retested? Who risks their life long health on treatments they can’t afford without getting a second test they can’t afford?

I think you're missing the point. There are no reliable tests which can determine if a person is actually infected with the HIV retrovirus. The tests themselves only detect an immune response in your body - which can be triggered by about 100 different and normal conditions - one of which is pregnancy.

Below is the video documentary release from the “House of Numbers” special edition film series – “HIV Testing Exposed, Revealed and Deconstructed.”



YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE
Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/32537863

This video includes all nine House of Numbers special feature mini-documentaries on HIV Testing from the Deluxe Edition DVD:

- HIV Testing 101
- False Positives: Causes and Factors
- History and Evolution of HIV Testing
- Reading the Fine Print: HIV Test Inserts
- The Changing Criteria of Western Blot Testing
- Deciphering Test Results for False Positives
- Examining the "Gold Standard"
- Rapid Testing in High Risk vs. Low Risk Populations
- HIV Testing Campaigns

.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by Mr. Bill

I think you're missing the point. There are no reliable tests which can determine if a person is actually infected with the HIV retrovirus. The tests themselves only detect an immune response in your body - which can be triggered by about 100 different and normal conditions - one of which is pregnancy.

Here's the video documentary release from the “House of Numbers” special edition film series – “HIV Testing Exposed, Revealed and Deconstructed.”



YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE
Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/32537863

This video includes all nine House of Numbers special feature mini-documentaries on HIV Testing from the Deluxe Edition DVD:

- HIV Testing 101
- False Positives: Causes and Factors
- History and Evolution of HIV Testing
- Reading the Fine Print: HIV Test Inserts
- The Changing Criteria of Western Blot Testing
- Deciphering Test Results for False Positives
- Examining the "Gold Standard"
- Rapid Testing in High Risk vs. Low Risk Populations
- HIV Testing Campaigns

.

No, I’m not missing the point. The point is that if you were tested (because of job, post surgery transfusion concerns, etc.) and you get a positive result, why would you not get a second? Or “Track the trend” if you don’t trust the reliability of the tests? An article in a link on the omsj website recommended multiple tests over a period of time

As far as videos go, anything that can be covered in a 2, 5, 10 minute video will have a lot more rhetoric than facts.
Any case, pro-HIV causes aids or the opposite position, can’t be conclusively presented on youtube.

[Mr. Bill]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

No, I’m not missing the point. The point is that if you were tested (because of job, post surgery transfusion concerns, etc.) and you get a positive result, why would you not get a second? Or “Track the trend” if you don’t trust the reliability of the tests? An article in a link on the omsj website recommended multiple tests over a period of time

As far as videos go, anything that can be covered in a 2, 5, 10 minute video will have a lot more rhetoric than facts.
Any case, pro-HIV causes aids or the opposite position, can’t be conclusively presented on youtube.

My point - and the point of thousands of others all over the planet - is that NO test conclusively proves that anyone is infected with the fake HIV virus.

That said, why would you want to get an HIV test, at all? ...or another one and another and another ...when none of them actually test for HIV?

The video I suggested above is 48 minutes long - not 2, 5, or 10 minutes and it provides admissions that the tests are unreliable - from those who promote the unproven HIV=AIDS hypothesis - along with a ton of other important facts.

- HIV Testing 101
- False Positives: Causes and Factors
- History and Evolution of HIV Testing
- Reading the Fine Print: HIV Test Inserts
- The Changing Criteria of Western Blot Testing
- Deciphering Test Results for False Positives
- Examining the "Gold Standard"
- Rapid Testing in High Risk vs. Low Risk Populations
- HIV Testing Campaigns

While there are 100's of posts in this thread with articles and information, yes I also added some videos for those who are more inclined to watch and listen rather than read the data.

From what I'm getting, your central argument is over the method by which the information is disseminated. Perhaps you should better familiarize yourself with HIV/AIDS first.

.

[Mr. Bill]

Where's The Original Paper Supporting HIV = AIDS?

Few Americans can explain how polymerase chain reaction (PCR) works or who invented it. But for those involved in the criminal justice system, few will deny the contributions made by Kary Mullis Ph.D that led to his 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. As a result of his invention, The Innocence Project has helped to clear 280 people previously convicted of serious crimes in the United States.

Seventeen of those innocent men were sentenced to death.

Dr. Mullis started to ask questions about HIV and AIDS while developing tests that used PCR. But when AIDS researchers got angry when he asked basic questions about HIV and AIDS, he knew something was amiss.

Gary Null Ph.D recently interviewed Dr. Kary Mullis, who states: "The way to get rid of AIDS is to stop funding it."



Devote 18 minutes to watch a video that can possibly save your life.

Watch the video interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IifgAvXU3ts

.