Thank you, all! I don't know how much of a campaign it might be. I just feel that, if people don't like the way things are going in their world, they have a unique opportunity here in America to speak out about them. The thing is, you can complain to your buddies at the bar about an issue, and they may agree or disagree, but complaining to your buddy won't change a thing. Complaining to the people who are capable of changing things you want to change makes far more sense.
My particular situation was unique and confusing. I can't say the situation will ever come up again. In my case, simply acknowledging that a review was accurate was enough to be banned, while the guidelines state that revealing private details is what is the big no-no. I know enough to not reveal details, so I thought I was within the rules. Clearly, the wording is vague enough that there was a lot of confusion over whether an infraction took place at all. My interpretation is that one did not, but I am more than happy to abide by whatever rules, guidelines, or repercussions the staff decide upon. If it were not for my providing, my alignment would be Lawful Good, but with that particular facet of my life, I'm firmly Neutral Good. Given my alignment, it came as a bit of a shock that I had broken any rules, as I do try to toe that line with care.
As far as the issue of whether providers should be allowed to know the contents of their own reviews - there is precedence for this on other boards. I believe there's a huge money making opportunity here, and I have some great ideas on how to implement it, supposing anyone is interested.
Have a wonderful day, everyone, and thank you for taking interest in little ol' me. /curtesy
Thanks Dearhunter!
