Kinda BS on some girls getting ONLY the 'positive' reviews posted

[Guest052813-01]

Originally Posted by malwoody

So are we to believe that Autumn just threw her post out there...yes it is unsubstantiated as the review is supposedly awol... I wonder what motivated the popcorn post? If the missing review does not involve her, why the popcorn? Of course if this is all rumor, as Super Mod, I'm sure you can clear this snafu up right away and get to the bottom of where the review went and more importantly, who took it down if it even ever existed. My guess is it did as I have never known the op(Autumn)to engage in any undue drama or Stacy for that matter.

I have no connection to either side therby no "dog in this fight", I am just curious at this point about the review and I think unless it broke some rule it should be restored.

I'm sure you will look into it and straighten everything out..

I will be happy to look into this as soon as I receive information about the issue so that I can research it. So far, I have hearsay evidence about a possible removal of a review from a third party who has no connection to the parties involved except for the fact that she revealed the details of a private communication with a hobbyist without his consent, which, in and of itself, could be grounds for a warning or infraction.

[SinsOfTheFlesh]

Yes, actually we are to believe that Autumn just 'threw a post out there', since her post contained no useful information, only speculation and information gleaned from an unnamed friend, about an unnamed provider. That is sort of the textbook of just throwing something out there.

To put it another way, any post that is centered around "I'm not naming names" is a drama magnet, simple as that. All it does is lead to rumors, gossip, and speculation as to who the 'lucky' lady protected by the auspices of the all powerful mods might be. Since I am reasonably certain it is not me, I don't have a dog in this fight anyways. Particularly since I just got done sitting out a temporary suspension (shocking, I know!), I'm pretty sure I don't have any pocket mods in my corner! LOL

I guess I'm old school. If I decide to post something like this, I'm just going to say what I know and call BS on it. Something along the lines of "Mods, why did SuzySucksAlot's review get pulled? No other provider gets the benefit of having an unflattering review deleted, so I'd like to know why Suzy is being given special consideration. Thanks and have a good day". Anything less, is just shit stirring.

[Guest052813-01]

Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

Yes, actually we are to believe that Autumn just 'threw a post out there', since her post contained no useful information, only speculation and information gleaned from an unnamed friend, about an unnamed provider. That is sort of the textbook of just throwing something out there.

To put it another way, any post that is centered around "I'm not naming names" is a drama magnet, simple as that. All it does is lead to rumors, gossip, and speculation as to who the 'lucky' lady protected by the auspices of the all powerful mods might be. Since I am reasonably certain it is not me, I don't have a dog in this fight anyways. Particularly since I just got done sitting out a temporary suspension (shocking, I know!), I'm pretty sure I don't have any pocket mods in my corner! LOL

I guess I'm old school. If I decide to post something like this, I'm just going to say what I know and call BS on it. Something along the lines of "Mods, why did SuzySucksAlot's review get pulled? No other provider gets the benefit of having an unflattering review deleted, so I'd like to know why Suzy is being given special consideration. Thanks and have a good day". Anything less, is just shit stirring.

It's even better if the person with a question would contact the mods via PM first to see if their question can be answered BCD without stirring things up. Then, if they do not get a response, start a thread. But, some people love to stir up the shit.

[BigDeal]

Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

Yes, actually we are to believe that Autumn just 'threw a post out there', since her post contained no useful information, only speculation and information gleaned from an unnamed friend, about an unnamed provider. That is sort of the textbook of just throwing something out there.

To put it another way, any post that is centered around "I'm not naming names" is a drama magnet, simple as that. All it does is lead to rumors, gossip, and speculation as to who the 'lucky' lady protected by the auspices of the all powerful mods might be. Since I am reasonably certain it is not me, I don't have a dog in this fight anyways. Particularly since I just got done sitting out a temporary suspension (shocking, I know!), I'm pretty sure I don't have any pocket mods in my corner! LOL

I guess I'm old school. If I decide to post something like this, I'm just going to say what I know and call BS on it. Something along the lines of "Mods, why did SuzySucksAlot's review get pulled? No other provider gets the benefit of having an unflattering review deleted, so I'd like to know why Suzy is being given special consideration. Thanks and have a good day". Anything less, is just shit stirring.

Just curious here...but does "Suzysucksalot" have a showcase?
Im interested if so....

[Guest052813-01]

The review in question is not deleted from the review forum, but was not assigned to the correct provider. This may be why the person who spoke with Autumn thought the review was deleted - because he didn't find listed under the provider's review list. I will be seeking out this review in the assignment list and reassigning it to the correct provider. I was the one who approved the review in the middle of July.

BTW - review assignments are missed all the time. Especially if the provider is not a member of ECCIE or the reviewer neglects to put the provider's handle or link to her ECCIE profile in the review. This provider was from outside Kansas City, so it will be difficult to find her profile. Do not panic if the review does not appear in a provider's queue. You should still be able to see it under your written reviews.

[Autumnkc]

SinsofFlesh.... I totally agree with you. My post was just to get it out there... I dont mean to cause the drama... just stating that its annoying when mods have 'favorites' but thats life in general. Owell. Moving on. LOL

[Guest062813-1]

Personally, I couldn't care less....who cares...if it doesn't affect me I don't giv-a-damn...but thats just me....it is kinda fishy...and could be dramatic...no one was named but it still felt like you were shooting at someone....and I'm sure she noticed....you don't know why it got deleted....but why bother...

[Guest052813-01]

Originally Posted by Autumnkc

SinsofFlesh.... I totally agree with you. My post was just to get it out there... I dont mean to cause the drama... just stating that its annoying when mods have 'favorites' but thats life in general. Owell. Moving on. LOL

So, let me get this straight. Because of a deep-seeded jealousy you make a statement that was blatantly false just to make a point? Good use of the board's resources.

[growler]

So you're a mind reader to? Did you remove the review?

Originally Posted by fritz3552

So, let me get this straight. Because of a deep-seeded jealousy you make a statement that was blatantly false just to make a point? Good use of the board's resources.

[BigDeal]

dont have a dog in this fight....just an opinion (which are like assholes) but I know Autumn and believe her to be drama free and a very good honest person. So my money unfortutanely is on her!
Very rare indeed that Autumn would ever say something or to stir something up unless she truly believes it to be

[SinsOfTheFlesh]

Originally Posted by BigDeal

Just curious here...but does "Suzysucksalot" have a showcase?
Im interested if so....

Unfortunately, SuzySucksAlot retired long ago, but she taught me everything she knew before she left

[The DarkSide]

What is all these dogs and fights, are we having a Michael Vick convention coming to Kansas city?

[KCQuestor]

Man, I wish I knew what was going on in this thread. With all of the innuendo and backhand comments and hints and suggestions, I totally feel like I missed the class on reading between the lines of a hooker board.

[guest010313]

Originally Posted by KCQuestor

Man, I wish I knew what was going on in this thread. With all of the innuendo and backhand comments and hints and suggestions, I totally feel like I missed the class on reading between the lines of a hooker board.

One girl (not from KC apparently) got a bad review which was apparently attributed to the wrong person or in the wrong forum and that has been fixed. The writer of said review is kinda retarded and started some shit by saying that his negative review was removed because he can't be bothered to look at HIS OWN review list. He recruited female help (again......kinda retarded) to fix it with a VERY passive-aggressive thread.

[Guest052813-01]

Originally Posted by growler

So you're a mind reader to? Did you remove the review?

As stated earlier, the review was never removed. It was always there. It was indexed to the wrong provider. Hence, the reason for the original post.