NCNS, Sex, Lies and Videotaped Excuses and Bust Sessions.

[levibob56]

Originally Posted by arthur_s

NCNS likely dont get reported because they dont fit as a review and they dont fit as an alert, so they are practically hard to search and find and lost in the sea of coed. Why not have a separate sub-forum for NCNS and similar non alert worthy issues that is searchable and can appear as part of member stats?

+1

[Codybeast]

Originally Posted by arthur_s

NCNS likely dont get reported because they dont fit as a review and they dont fit as an alert, so they are practically hard to search and find and lost in the sea of coed. Why not have a separate sub-forum for NCNS and similar non alert worthy issues that is searchable and can appear as part of member stats?

+2

[guest031612-2]

Originally Posted by Codybeast

It's impossible to conclusively state what the motivation is as Every situation is different. Some vent, some warn and some do both.

I'm more curious about what the motivation is of mongers who start threads clearly for the purpose of impressing providers.
Are they delusional enough to believe that doing so will actually improve their standing with the ladies?

Coody, if you hobby'd at ALL, you would know the best way to garner favor, "impress" the ladies as you call it, is with the almighty dollar and a good hard fucking. It's not real complicated. It works in real life too- maybe you should try it with your SO and improve your "relationship" with her so you wouldn't have to creep around an escort board behind her back dreaming about what could be and espousing your opinions on all the mongering you have NOTHING to do with other than a mere fantasy..."+2" on the NCNS forum Coody- LOL

The motivation of the thread is that when I see all the NCNS vents the first thought I have is "what a dumb fuck- he sat around all that time for nothing."

If a deal goes bad for me I leave. I "peace out." I don't give it a second thought. I don't send a text, then another text then another text then wait then another text then try a phone call then do a loop around then another text then another loop around when the deal had gone South 30 minutes beforehand then go home and flame the board. It's comical.

It runs with the hobby is all. Some are reliable, some are not. I mean what the fuck do people expect? Common decency- sure! Common courtesy!- sure!

Do another loop around---

[RALPHEY BOY]

To me it boils down to TCB which goes both ways, like everyone says, how hard is it to send a text or PM or email

[rockerrick]

I believe you could probably chalk the flaming up to newbie hobbiest. But the times I've seen providers do it they were seasoned. And it sucks for either side because no one's time is more valuable . We're all only here about 70 - 80 yrs.

[Codybeast]

Originally Posted by LBoog

maybe you should try it with your SO and improve your "relationship" with her so you wouldn't have to creep around a whore board behind her back dreaming about what could be and espousing your opinions on all the mongering you have NOTHING to do with other than a mere fantasy..."+2" on the NCNS forum Coody- LOL

The motivation of the thread is that when I see all the NCNS vents the first thought I have is "what a dumb fuck- he sat around all that time for nothing."

If a deal goes bad for me I leave. I "peace out." I don't give it a second thought. I don't send a text, then another text then another text then wait then another text then try a phone call then do a loop around then another text then another loop around when the deal had gone South 30 minutes beforehand then go home and flame the board. It's comical.

It runs with the hobby is all. Some are reliable, some are not. I mean what the fuck do people expect? Common decency- sure! Common courtesy!- sure!

Do another loop around---

As usual behind the times with absolutely NO clue as what you're talking about. I have been single for two weeks now and even posted as much in a separate thread.
I also have posted just about as many reviews as you have. Your typical cocky attitude is supported by ignorance as usual. Nothing new.

So aside from your general cluelessness and negativity on the boards let's address the topic.

Mongers post threads about NSNC's because they fucking feel like it and aren't concerned about Boog's who sit on their high horses throwing in snide remarks and judgments from the sidelines.

If a deal goes bad for you then you simply move on. Good for you and so would I but not Everybody is you!

Who are you to judge anyone for posting NSNC's on the boards?

In fact you are the ONLY one complaining about it and I suspect most mongers appreciate it because it ...
a) Gives them a heads up and b) keeps the providers who pull this NSNC bullshit accountable.

Now you started this BS with me with your snide remarks on one such Rockerrick NSNC thread. Never even heard of you prior to that swift move.
I really have no problem with the less than amicable persona you bring to the board however I will put you in your place when appropriate and I only do this because you invited it.

[Vyt]

All right, before there is any putting in any place, everyone involved can the personal attacks and return to the subject or there will be (more) consequences. Thank you.

[AdventureAdams]

Originally Posted by harkontume

Never happened to me.
(that I remember)

Yeah I haven't had a NCNS since my CL days, although I understand how frustrating it is setting aside time in your busy schedule only to be disappointed with a no show. Some people just don't take others into consideration.

[E2]

IMHO, 'Reviews' IS the proper place for NCNS. An appointment was scheduled and services were / were not satisfactory.

There are providers that have as many 'Yes' recs as NCNSs, but the average researcher might not turn up the NCNSs and therefore be operating under false information.

I am not sure when the "there had to be touching / meeting" rule came into effect.

Just my .02

[Codybeast]

Originally Posted by E2

IMHO, 'Reviews' IS the proper place for NCNS. An appointment was scheduled and services were / were not satisfactory.

There are providers that have as many 'Yes' recs as NCNSs, but the average researcher might not turn up the NCNSs and therefore be operating under false information.

I am not sure when the "there had to be touching / meeting" rule came into effect.

Just my .02

That makes perfect sense.