Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

ammonite · 12-04-2011, 09:03 AM

Doglegg and SexTexas are right, It shouldn't matter if the hobbyist is male or female.
She purchased the session and the hobbyist, regardless of gender, should be able to post a review under Independent Provider Reviews.
Maybe a new trend is starting with ladies hobbying lol.

Sonya Playmate · 12-04-2011, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ammonite

Doglegg and SexTexas are right, It shouldn't matter if the hobbyist is male or female.
She purchased the session and the hobbyist, regardless of gender, should be able to post a review under Independent Provider Reviews.
Maybe a new trend is starting with ladies hobbying lol.

Well said ammonite

Mojojo · 12-04-2011, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FootLong

I think any debate about where this should be posted should be moved to a separate thread, so as not to hijack this excellent review.

Good job on your first-ever review, Ella! Of course, it helps when you start out with good subject matter, like our legendary Sonya. Have fun out there!

I agree with you so will temporarily lock the thread till we get a definite answer.

Mokoa · 12-04-2011, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doglegg

Also, I did not realize that being female automatically meant reviews could not be posted.

Out of xxx number of female hobbyist on the board, none are allowed to post a review?

Even a provider can pay for services - a role reversal for certain- but if he or she pays for services, shouldn't that person be allowed to post a review?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SexTexas

I agree with Doglegg. This was a review by a hobbyist not a provider. Does being female make you of less value for reviews?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ammonite

Doglegg and SexTexas are right, It shouldn't matter if the hobbyist is male or female.
She purchased the session and the hobbyist, regardless of gender, should be able to post a review under Independent Provider Reviews.
Maybe a new trend is starting with ladies hobbying lol.

Females are, and have always been, allowed to post reviews. They just cannot post them in the review forums. They cannot receive any credit for the reviews because if they did they will receive Premium Access and how many of you guys want females to have access to the Men's Lounge forums, Hmmmm?

Mokoa · 12-04-2011, 02:08 PM

The owners have spoken.

The review will remain where it is. The ROS will remain as it is.

I am opening the thread. Please stick to the topic of Ella's review. If anyone wants to discuss the topic of female reviews please start that topic in its own thread. If anyone wants to discuss the topic of the decision made regarding this thread please start that topic in its own thread.

levi tab · 12-04-2011, 02:39 PM

Yeah, Sonya is pretty quick at getting into her birthday suite!

* Mods not sure about the ROS etiquette on this one since I'd like for Ella to know which part of her review I'm commenting on.

Thanks Ella for the review, and welcome to the board

Mojojo · 12-04-2011, 04:30 PM

Please make sure you guys use the private tags when quoting ROS information.

Mokoa · 12-04-2011, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by levi tab

* Mods not sure about the ROS etiquette on this one since I'd like for Ella to know which part of her review I'm commenting on.

My statement in Post 20 was quite clear...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mokoa

The ROS will remain as it is.

bamatide · 12-04-2011, 05:59 PM

nice review well done.

MsPrittiKitti · 12-04-2011, 06:03 PM

*sigh* i was hoping ros would be public
booo! *thumbs down* lol

Likinikki · 12-04-2011, 08:50 PM

That's our Sonya...the little minx! Sounds like a fantasy cum true!

Doglegg · 12-04-2011, 09:34 PM

I am requesting Ella's ROS be made public since it has been moved to a non-review forum and therefore is not considered 'not for public consumption' material.

Thank you,

Dogg

Mokoa · 12-04-2011, 09:38 PM

Doglegg...

I have explained things back in Post 20. In that post I also stated the following...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mokoa

If anyone wants to discuss the topic of the decision made regarding this thread please start that topic in its own thread.

Now, I have asked nicely. I will not ask again.

Doglegg · 12-04-2011, 09:55 PM

To my knowledge, bleak as it may be, I am not questioning the authority or wisdom of moving the posting to the CoEd section.

As the review was posted by a female, it should be logical that any postings would be a available to the OP, and being female, the OP would be able to view any replies.

Again, in this reply to this posting and to this posting only and to the OP's original posting, I am only requesting the OP's original ROS since it was originally and erronously posted in a forum that precluded public viewing.

Dogg

Mokoa · 12-04-2011, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doglegg

To my knowledge, bleak as it may be, I am not questioning the authority or wisdom of moving the posting to the CoEd section.

Yes, I know that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doglegg

As the review was posted by a female, it should be logical that any postings would be a available to the OP, and being female, the OP would be able to view any replies.

Again, in this reply to this posting and to this posting only and to the OP's original posting, I am only requesting the OP's original ROS since it was originally and erronously posted in a forum that precluded public viewing.

Well, I also stated in Post 20...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mokoa

The owners have spoken.

The review will remain where it is. The ROS will remain as it is.

That decision comes directly from the owners.

Until there is a change in policy concerning this matter, there is nothing Staff can do.

Now, for the last time, please follow the directions I posted in Post 20. Further deviations will not be tolerated.