Its inexplicable: Judge blocks Trump from cracking down on illegal alien truck drivers.

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by farmstud60

What recent DOT regulation?

Are you posting without even knowing what we are talking about?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...vers-127527676

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Mort Watt

Are you posting without even knowing what we are talking about?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...vers-127527676

That would be a first, LOLLING!

[Schwarzer Ritter]

According to the left, giving CDLs to terrorists is good. Still haven't heard an explanation.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

According to the left, giving CDLs to terrorists is good. Still haven't heard an explanation.

Because the left doesn’t want to give CDL’s to terrorists as you claim. Nobody does.

The entirety of your argument stems from a claim by the Uzbeki government which is highly suspect.

This is truly a troll thread. A completely bogus argument ginned up to create controversy.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Supporting terrorism is not American. Go home bot.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

Supporting terrorism is not American. Go home bot.

Supporting freedom of speech and association is American. Did this Uzbeki “Terrorist” actually commit any acts that the American system of justice would consider crimes or terrorism? I’m betting not.

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Supporting freedom of speech and association is American. Did this Uzbeki “Terrorist” actually commit any acts that the American system of justice would consider crimes or terrorism? I’m betting not.

He didn't, that I can find. The OP has just reverted to use of the "terrorism" scare because his main argument was shown to be a misrepresentation of the judge's ruling against a capricous DOT regulation.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Because the left doesn’t want to give CDL’s to terrorists as you claim. Nobody does.

But the left DOES want to give CDL to unqualified foreigners without vetting them.

We know this because the LEFT has given THOUSANDS of CDL to illegal immigrants who have not been vetted.

So what the LEFT WANTS to do and WHAT it ACTUALLY does are two very different things.

It would be nice if leftists understood that nobody gives tow rats fcuks about their intentions... just there always (predictably) shitty results.

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by texassapper

But the left DOES want to give CDL to unqualified foreigners without vetting them.

We know this because the LEFT has given THOUSANDS of CDL to illegal immigrants who have not been vetted.

So what the LEFT WANTS to do and WHAT it ACTUALLY does are two very different things.

It would be nice if leftists understood that nobody gives tow rats fcuks about their intentions... just there always (predictably) shitty results.

Right. All of them. ALL of the Left.

WE ALL WANT THIS.

And it's true! It has to be. Because you put ALL of the important words in CAPS.

(I have to say that as a Troll thread, this one is remarkably successful also! More arrive by the minute, and the divisiveness is reaching new recent highs!)

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by Mort Watt

Right. All of them. ALL of the Left.

WE ALL WANT THIS.

And it's true! It has to be. Because you put ALL of the important words in CAPS.

Which leftists are arguing to vet illegal immigrants and NOT give them CDLs? I'll wait.

Originally Posted by Mort Watt

(I have to say that as a Troll thread, this one is remarkably successful also! More arrive by the minute, and the divisiveness is reaching new recent highs!)

you've expressed this opinion on every thread you dislike... it's tiresome.. maybe you should create your own thread to call out all the threads you don't like. You can be the great unifier! Try staying on topic....

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by texassapper

Which leftists are arguing to vet illegal immigrants and NOT give them CDLs? I'll wait.

you've expressed this opinion on every thread you dislike... it's tiresome.. maybe you should create your own thread to call out all the threads you don't like. You can be the great unifier! Try staying on topic....

First, a sorely needed correction. You misquote me. It is not surprising in itself that you have done so. It's MAGA SOP. But I have not said that I "dislike" these threads. Exactly the opposite! I relish rubbing MAGA noses in their own Troll threads.

But YES. This is tiresome. Almost as tiresome as you doing a sudden mid-afternoon "drive by" on every thread that you haven't been able to post in for the past few days just to repeat a bunch of bullshit that has already been said...and mostly discredited. Are you caught up yet?

Now, to get back "on topic"...that all too common MAGA whine resorted to when they can't make a relevant point. But still...since you insist....

The statement highlighted above is pure absurdity. You obviously do not understand the concept of how there is no burden to prove a negative. And it instantly discredits your own argument. But please pursue that line of reasoning anyway. I am bored waiting for my next meeting and clarifying your ignorance of this concept could be a welcome distraction.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Supporting freedom of speech and association is American. Did this Uzbeki “Terrorist” actually commit any acts that the American system of justice would consider crimes or terrorism? I’m betting not.

And what has Trump done for you to call him a fascist? Your hypocrisy is showing.

[farmstud60]

Originally Posted by Mort Watt

Are you posting without even knowing what we are talking about?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...vers-127527676

That was nothing new, just went back to the way it always should have been.

[69in2it69]

Originally Posted by texassapper

But the left DOES want to give CDL to unqualified foreigners without vetting them.

We know this because the LEFT has given THOUSANDS of CDL to illegal immigrants who have not been vetted.

So what the LEFT WANTS to do and WHAT it ACTUALLY does are two very different things.

It would be nice if leftists understood that nobody gives tow rats fcuks about their intentions... just there always (predictably) shitty results.

It's not hard...it's like the Maggies don't even try anymore. Like rats on a sinking ship but their idol says it's a hoax...


General Requirements for a CDL in California

To obtain a Commercial Driver's License (CDL) in California, applicants must meet specific criteria related to age, residency, medical fitness, and testing.
Age Requirements

Type of DrivingMinimum AgeIntrastate (within CA)18 yearsInterstate (out of state)21 years
Residency and Identification

• Must be a California resident.
• Provide proof of identity (e.g., California driver’s license, passport).
• Present proof of Social Security number.

Medical Examination

• Complete a medical examination and provide a Medical Examiner’s Certificate.
• Vision must be at least 20/40 in each eye (with or without corrective lenses).

Steps to Obtain a CDL

1. Obtain a Commercial Learner's Permit (CLP):
   
   • Hold a valid California noncommercial Class C driver’s license.
   • Complete an online CDL application.
   • Visit a DMV office to submit required documents and pay the application fee.
   • Pass the knowledge test.
2. Complete Training:
   
   • Attend a truck driving school (recommended).
   • Complete at least 15 hours of behind-the-wheel training.
3. Pass Skills Test:
   
   • After holding the CLP for at least 14 days, schedule and pass the skills test, which includes vehicle inspection, basic control, and road driving.

Testing Requirements

• Pass both knowledge and skills tests specific to the class of CDL being applied for.
• Skills tests must be conducted in a vehicle representative of the class of license sought.

Meeting these requirements ensures that drivers are qualified to operate commercial vehicles safely.

[Yssup Rider]

Too many words. Our fellow debaters will overload.