Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 328
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 310
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71509
biomed169914
Yssup Rider63195
gman4455600
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling50084
WTF48272
pyramider46452
bambino45895
The_Waco_Kid41186
CryptKicker37438
Dr-epg37050
Mokoa36516
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Yesterday, 02:00 PM   #16
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,010
Encounters: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
Or maybe your interpretation of events is just lies. Your claim that Plaskett was enabling Epstein is a straight up pack of lies.
What plausible reason would Plaskett have to be communicating with a known sex offender during the middle of a house hearing to obtain questions to ask to attempt to incriminate Trump?
texassapper is online now   Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:30 PM   #17
txdot-guy
Lifetime Premium Access
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 5,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post
What plausible reason would Plaskett have to be communicating with a known sex offender during the middle of a house hearing to obtain questions to ask to attempt to incriminate Trump?
And that’s somehow enabling Epstein? Please explain.
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old Yesterday, 06:16 PM   #18
Schwarzer Ritter
Valued Poster
 
Schwarzer Ritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2025
Location: Springfield
Posts: 657
Encounters: 4
Default

Well, rules prevent us all from freely expressing ( most of us anyway) our disgust of the actions of Epstein.
I think we know who stands where now.
Schwarzer Ritter is offline   Quote
Old Today, 09:49 AM   #19
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,010
Encounters: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
And that’s somehow enabling Epstein? Please explain.
What would you call using your seat in Congress to feed questions from a registered sex offender into the Congressional record if not enabling?

Remember this is a guy who Democrats claim was so toxic that Trumps mere presence in the documents demands they be released... now.... not in 2013,16,20,24... only now. Which says a lot about the current state of democrat political power... lol
texassapper is online now   Quote
Old Today, 10:19 AM   #20
txdot-guy
Lifetime Premium Access
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 5,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post
What would you call using your seat in Congress to feed questions from a registered sex offender into the Congressional record if not enabling?
I don’t consider that enabling anyone except the questioner. Her choice to use Epstein as a source is fairly execrable but it’s not illegal and apparently it’s not worthy of censure according to Congress.

Quote:
Remember this is a guy who Democrats claim was so toxic that Trumps mere presence in the documents demands they be released... now.... not in 2013,16,20,24... only now. Which says a lot about the current state of democrat political power... lol
You’re wrong on the people pushing for the release of these documents. It’s not just democrats but republicans as well. The reason that the democrats were pushing it so hard is that it’s a true bipartisan issue that citizens on both sides are calling for. Note that when it finally came to a vote it was nearly unanimous.

It was Trump and Mike Johnson who kept the reins on until it became impossible for the issue to be stopped.
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved