Quote:
Originally Posted by pat911
I got a PM from Dr EPG saying me my report was inaccurate. I was there I know what went down this provider is nothing but trouble. I only posted this to help others avoid my dilemma what seems like the only info wanted on this site is hardcore details. I post to inform not to gain premium access.
|
Sir that is not what was said and definitely not why the encounter was reject
As per ECCIE guidelines there was an inquiry made pertaining to the encounter don’t try to make it more than what it was.
If you feel you want to discuss this in more detail you can always send me a Pm
#23 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.
