Review: MJ - nice alternative for rainy day.

[vicinms]

Originally Posted by lowgear

...also i know for a fact that one of oilspills review of a very trusted provider is a fake,so i would have to assume the other two are fakes as well,the trusted provider even sent pm's to oilspill with no replies???/

Actually, you don't know any such thing, "for a fact". You jump to the same conclusions as many others, primarily based on someones newbie status and your dislike/predjudice toward someone!

He saw all 3 of the ladies that he reviewed and it has been verified by them, though the dates weren't very accurate. That doesn't make reviews fake, nor does it mean that a provider has created a hobbyist account to write reviews of herself. Also, not everyone lives by their email or spend all their time on ECCIE so they can "prove" to all the whinning naysayers that they saw who they said they did.

It would nice if people would quit being so rude to new members and question every little word they post. It's time to keep the suspicions off the public forums and quit creating needless drama for those who love to jump on the bandwagon!

[lowgear]

Wait one minute vic, The review was 34 days old before i ever posted a reply,so i did not jump on anyone. A very trusted provider who was reviewed by oilspill sent me a pm yesterday 10/24/11 that she never saw oilspill and that she even contacted the mods with the info,i never replied to any of oilfields post until she told me this.And vic i think he has had 40 days to reply,so vic no matter who i like or dislike the facts remains the same.Vic why don't you post the facts for everyone to see,the truth is that the guy who saw two of these ladies, one which was a year ago,not in jan 2011 as posted, was not using the handle oilspill.So the facts are that the handle oilspill and his email address was not the handle and email address that he contacted two ladies with.so anyway you look at it oilspill the handle never saw these ladies.FACT? oh and if i did my home work correct, then we have a dawg with multiple handles? Oh i did very well in school

[JustaGuyinMS]

lowgear:

You're way off base on the most important part of this situation, and your information is old as of today. Yes, the reviews were initially challenged by all three ladies, and that is why we pursued resolving whether they were true. Yes, the guy's handle is not the one he used some time ago, but there is no prohibition about someone changing their handle as long as they use only one.

Oilspill provided me with information that was verified by the ladies he saw. As vicinms said, his dates were bad, but the reviews are true. All three of the ladies now remember him.

So, I strongly advise that you re-read the advice vicinms gave you and abide by it.

As I've said before, use the RTM function rather than posting potentially spurious accusations in public threads.

JaG