Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 392
Harley Diablo 375
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 275
George Spelvin 263
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70717
biomed162700
Yssup Rider60417
gman4453234
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48458
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino41747
CryptKicker37183
Mokoa36491
The_Waco_Kid36103
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Thread Closed
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2023, 11:05 PM   #16
69in2it69
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2016
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 859
Encounters: 14
Default

Or maybe I'm capable of reading and comprehending a book that is trying to be banned, that is about the state of society when books are banned?



Rambling BS that is cut and pasted, doesn't deserve my attention to that level.
69in2it69 is offline  
Old 05-23-2023, 11:07 PM   #17
chefnerd
Just a ROFF with CRSS
 
chefnerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere in the hills
Posts: 1,194
Encounters: 7
Default

Standard response I see from someone with NO INTELLIGENT reply. So MAGA person who do think this is from? I doubt you have the smarts to figure it out and will probably answer with some moronic answer like before
chefnerd is offline  
Old 05-23-2023, 11:09 PM   #18
chefnerd
Just a ROFF with CRSS
 
chefnerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere in the hills
Posts: 1,194
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69in2it69 View Post
Or maybe I'm capable of reading and comprehending a book that is trying to be banned, that is about the state of society when books are banned?



Rambling BS that is cut and pasted, doesn't deserve my attention to that level.
If you are reading banned books then I commend you. And no what I posted is NOT rambling. It is an actual historic and recorded speech.
chefnerd is offline  
Old 05-23-2023, 11:18 PM   #19
69in2it69
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2016
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 859
Encounters: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chefnerd View Post
If you are reading banned books then I commend you. And no what I posted is NOT rambling. It is an actual historic and recorded speech.

If I'm reading banned books we are already fucked. Think about it...that would mean the FIRST amendment has been suppressed.
69in2it69 is offline  
Old 05-23-2023, 11:18 PM   #20
Lucas McCain
Valued Poster
 
Lucas McCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 10,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chefnerd View Post
In other words you are incapable of comprehending anything beyond Dick and Jane books
Man, I am just asking for the CliffsNotes version of your initial post. If you would have provided that in a few sentences, maybe people would actually read all of that to see what your values are that you are referring to. Because you did not and with that format, few are going to actually read all of it because you never bothered to spend an extra 30 seconds to explain why it was worth a long read in a fucked up format. Instead, you obviously decided to insult people because they weren't in the mood to read a bunch of words jumbled together that may or may not actually be insightful to them.

Don't take it as an insult. Some like me are just lazy readers on this board and definitely more so at later hours like now.
Lucas McCain is offline  
Old 05-23-2023, 11:27 PM   #21
the_real_Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
Encounters: 34
Default

[QUOTE=chefnerd;1063199928]
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
properly format your post. then i might read it. or not.

What, you can't read something at an elementary school level?
I'm sure that MILLIONS of US citizens understood it quite well at the time the address was given. Oh right, you have NO CLUE about this do you?
If you wrote it then double break between paragraphs. If you just copied and pasted, how about a citation for someone who put in the effort?
the_real_Barleycorn is offline  
Old 05-23-2023, 11:35 PM   #22
the_real_Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
Encounters: 34
Default

Well, I read it. It's good but wordy. I could cut it to a third with the same ideas but less poetic. This was written in the early 60s or late 50s in the last century. Eisenhower? Kennedy? McArthur? Stevenson? Graham? I could do a Bing search (Google is evil) but I'd rather let the OP do the work and explain what this means to you.
the_real_Barleycorn is offline  
Old 05-23-2023, 11:46 PM   #23
Why_Yes_I_Do
BANNED
 
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2013
Location: Railroad Tracks, other side thereof
Posts: 6,997
Encounters: 14
Default Likely got it from PBS or CBS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
Well, I read it. It's good but wordy. I could cut it to a third with the same ideas but less poetic. This was written in the early 60s or late 50s in the last century. Eisenhower? Kennedy? McArthur? Stevenson? Graham? I could do a Bing search (Google is evil) but I'd rather let the OP do the work and explain what this means to you.
Eisenhower's First Inaugural Address, Jan 20, 1953. Richard Nixon was the VP.


https://www.cbsnews.com/video/dwight...s-jan-20-1953/
Why_Yes_I_Do is offline  
Old 05-24-2023, 08:22 PM   #24
biomed1
Administrator
 
biomed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2, 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 62,700
Encounters: 32
Default Members Are Reminded . . .

Of the Following . . .
Quote:
  • #1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.
  • #3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.
  • #4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.
  • #6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.
  • #27 - Often times in online communities, members may display a tendency towards bringing their conflicts with other members to the board. This will be strongly discouraged and swift effort will be made to put it to rest. Additionally, staff will make every effort to stay uninvolved in conflicts and disputes between members off the board except in such cases where the board becomes directly affected.
Thread Closed
biomed1 is offline  
Thread Closed



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved