Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Impossible burgers taste like burgers made by a space alien who decided to make them in a star-trek like replicator based on what people told him it tastes like.
People who say that shit tastes and has the same texture as beef must smoke a lot of cigarettes or do other things to destroy their taste buds.
And replicating the part that it weeps/bleeds like medium-done beef is a really weird flex to me. Makes me think that the hippies who made this shit used to get teased for cooking their meat well done.
thanks for saving me the bother to even try one which i wasn't inclined to do in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfunkdenver
I find it curious that, rather than just not eating this stuff, you guys complain about it, and deride anyone who does.
I don't eat it, and I'm not a vegetarian, but the only person who needs to know that, is me.
Hope y'all feel better soon!
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
Complaining and complaining and complaining is all the right wing conservative crackpots know how to do.
Progress. It's what's for dinner.
would you two .. like some cheese to go with that whine ..
UUUOOOH .. Sir!
BAHHAHAAAAA
ok. teasing you two whiners aside .. first the entire "push" to remove real beef is just another part of the "Green Scam" and that's exactly what this is. the eco Nazis like AOC think cow farts are going to kill the planet with methane. ridiculous. one wonders if AOC and the rest of her gang of fucking idiots realize that protein is an essential part of any healthy diet. i'm not going to bother researching how much real protein is in these veg burgers but i'll bet it's far less than real meat per same serving size.
so let's say i'm right and it is far less, so much less that it becomes an nutritional issue. what would little AOC do about that? i'm quite sure she'll come up with some sort of protein pills or shakes (which already exist) and just say .. "drink a protein shake!"
the point of course is not only does this kill an important industry, that industry needs to be replaced with another industry, in this case agriculture. gotta grow them veggies for them fake burgers!!
so what's the point here? does AOC and her cunt squad think if you get rid of cow farts that the massive increase in agriculture to replace it using all sorts of modern chemicals is any better for poor suffering Mother Gaia? probably but she's a card carrying idiot.
if you'd like to read more on AOC and her "cow fart" obsession allow me to recommend the parity novel written by the world famous author and twittybird superstar .. catturd
I find it curious that, rather than just not eating this stuff, you guys complain about it, and deride anyone who does.
I tried it once just to be a bit more informed, but as I stated, the point of these products isn't to feed vegetarians/vegans, it's to move meat-eaters to their ideology. That's the part I don't approve of.
Nothing is going to happen. If it does, I'll be the only person in my neighborhood who has cows, pigs and chickens in his back yard. I'll sell that shit illegally and mark up the price by about 25% more than they cost in stores now. LOL
Very simple explanation for Epicuious's action and very simple solution:
They have a constitutional right to publish what the desire within certain bounds (libel,etc.) They are not required to publish what an individual or group wishes. The market will determine if their model succeeds financially.
No one is REQUIRED to read their content or choose to solely utilize their recipes that defer beef, just as no one is REQUIRED to eat beef.
I like beef, will still eat beef, and won't be subscribing to Epicurious, but may use one of their online recipes for taters or good veggies. That's my choice.
Those who like to expose their constitutional rights also need to recognize that those same rights extend to others, even if of different opinion.
Not that big a deal and not worth the bandwidth vis a vis other issues.
They have a constitutional right to publish what the desire within certain bounds (libel,etc.) They are not required to publish what an individual or group wishes. The market will determine if their model succeeds financially.
No one is REQUIRED to read their content or choose to solely utilize their recipes that defer beef, just as no one is REQUIRED to eat beef.
I like beef, will still eat beef, and won't be subscribing to Epicurious, but may use one of their online recipes for taters or good veggies. That's my choice.
Those who like to expose their constitutional rights also need to recognize that those same rights extend to others, even if of different opinion.
Not that big a deal and not worth the bandwidth vis a vis other issues.
Absolutely, they can post blog articles about the virtues of eating one's own shit for all I care, They have a right to free speech.
They do not, however, have a right to be free of criticism. And I've elected to talk about how hollow the gesture is.
"I've got buddies who think this whole thing is a Chinese-led globalist plot to reduce us all back to a serf peasantry, and have us all eating bugs while the rich get to eat proper animals."
And also the right to propagate blather as well. Do you (or your "buddies") really believe this shit? Or just spout off?
I tried it once just to be a bit more informed, but as I stated, the point of these products isn't to feed vegetarians/vegans, it's to move meat-eaters to their ideology. That's the part I don't approve of.
and as you pointed out .. to no one's particulr surprise ..
it tastes like a shit sandwich .. because it is
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas McCain
Nothing is going to happen. If it does, I'll be the only person in my neighborhood who has cows, pigs and chickens in his back yard. I'll sell that shit illegally and mark up the price by about 25% more than they cost in stores now. LOL
that's your one redeeming quality "ivy league" boy. u are a unabashed capitalist
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog1951
"I've got buddies who think this whole thing is a Chinese-led globalist plot to reduce us all back to a serf peasantry, and have us all eating bugs while the rich get to eat proper animals."
And also the right to propagate blather as well. Do you (or your "buddies") really believe this shit? Or just spout off?
"I've got buddies who think this whole thing is a Chinese-led globalist plot to reduce us all back to a serf peasantry, and have us all eating bugs while the rich get to eat proper animals."
And also the right to propagate blather as well. Do you (or your "buddies") really believe this shit? Or just spout off?
I do think that we're heading towards a type of corporate feudalism, yes. I think China's just trying to get a piece of the action.
Nothing is going to happen. If it does, I'll be the only person in my neighborhood who has cows, pigs and chickens in his back yard. I'll sell that shit illegally and mark up the price by about 25% more than they cost in stores now. LOL
Didn't you write a couple of months ago about how your security guards would stave off the rioters? My guess is your "neighborhood" doesn't allow livestock in your backyard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog1951
Very simple explanation for Epicuious's action and very simple solution:
...
yet you spent time writing out those platitudes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog1951
"I've got buddies who think this whole thing is a Chinese-led globalist plot to reduce us all back to a serf peasantry, and have us all eating bugs while the rich get to eat proper animals...
After WWII, famine was commonplace in China. The crops failed and the lakes were fished out, the peasants were forced to eat bugs. I heard in NoKo it is still common.
See, the point is you can eat beef if you want, or you can choose to not eat beef if you want. Same goes for broccoli, anchovies, sushi, etc. Cooking magazines can choose to focus on whatever recipe types they choose. No one is FORCING you to eat any ingredient or read or cook any recipe. It's your choice, but NOT your RIGHT to force your view on others. Why not let the MARKET decide? Don't buy Epicurious if you choose(I won't)..others may choose otherwise, but that's their prerogative, not yours to dictate.
