Iran Made Its Move And Odumbo Did Nothing.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

So Obama left Trump a burning Rome!

Where is that Drama Queen thread when ya need it?

Odumbo twiddled his thumbs while Rome burned.

Benghazi

Cairo

Ferguson

Baltimore

Oakland

Persian Gulf

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Benghazi

Ferguson

Baltimore

Oakland

I bet inside the White House looks worse than that. They way Donald J Putin humiliated Cruella Deville Melania you know that place is a shithole

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

I bet inside the White House looks worse than that. They way Donald J Putin humiliated Cruella Deville Melania you know that place is a shithole

You're blatantly off topic and trying to hijack this thread. Your post completely ignored what a POS Odumbo was as president and how he has created far more problems for this country -- for this world -- than he ever solved.

That any jackass would have the nerve to accuse Trump of ignoring what Russia is doing with Ukrainian boats after Odumbo's inaction after Iran took U.S. boats is unmitigated bullshit.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're blatantly off topic and trying to hijack this thread. Your post completely ignored what a POS Odumbo was as president and how he has created far more problems for this country -- for this world -- than he ever solved.

That any jackass would have the nerve to accuse Trump of ignoring what Russia is doing with Ukrainian boats after Odumbo's inaction after Iran took U.S. boats is unmitigated bullshit.

Hello New Friend. Obama took away their Nukes. Donald J Putin gave them back

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

Hello New Friend. Obama took away their Nukes. Donald J Trump (FTFY) gave them back

That would be a lie sold to you by Odumbo and his minions in the lame-stream media. Odumbo actually saw to it that the Iranians were given enough high quality uranium to build ten nuclear weapons -- and $1.7 billion to finance their assembly.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That would be a lie sold to you by Odumbo and his minions in the lame-stream media. Odumbo actually saw to it that the Iranians were given enough high quality uranium to build ten nuclear weapons -- and $1.7 billion to finance their assembly.

so should we get our friends the Saudis to go kill them. since we are such good friends and all

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

so should we get our friends the Saudis to go kill them. since we are such good friends and all

Any thing the Saudis do to interdict Iranian terrorism should be applauded, unless you are the kind that celebrates when the Iranians are successful in killing Americans. Are you the former or the latter?

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Any thing the Saudis do to interdict Iranian terrorism should be applauded, unless you are the kind that celebrates when the Iranians are successful in killing Americans. Are you the former or the latter?

I don't believe in killing. Anti Abortion and Anti Death Penalty

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

I don't believe in killing. Anti Abortion and Anti Death Penalty

You didn't answer the question. Are you going to applaud the Saudi effort to help neutralize Iranian militantism or are you one of those who will stand by and allow the Iranians to continue their effort to develop nuclear weapons and fund terrorist acts around the world? Both options involve death; so, saying you're against "killing" is equivocal. The important distinction is that with the second option those targeted and killed will be primarily Americans and their allies.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You didn't answer the question. Are you going to applaud the Saudi effort to help neutralize Iranian militantism or are you one of those who will stand by and allow the Iranians to continue their effort to develop nuclear weapons and fund terrorist acts around the world? Both options involve death; so, saying you're against "killing" is equivocal. The important distinction is that with the second option those targeted and killed will be primarily Americans and their allies.

No IB I'm not going to applaud Saudi Arabia, NK, Russia, or any other autocratic government that you seem to have fallen in love with. You and Donald J Putin have a "special" relationship. I'm just glad we are friends IB. So I thought you and Donald Putin didn't want to police the world? That is unless Donald Putin has business interests. Shameful

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

No IB I'm not going to applaud Saudi Arabia, NK, Russia, or any other autocratic government that you seem to have fallen in love with. You and Donald J Putin have a "special" relationship. I'm just glad we are friends IB. So I thought you and Donald Trump (you misspelled it again) didn't want to police the world? That is unless Donald Putin has business interests. Shameful

So, you're siding with the militant Islamic Iranian regime which sponsors world wide terror and which is known to have targeted and killed hundreds of Americans. Your un-American position is shameful.

[Wakeup]

Stop...

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

This thread is about the shitty POS Odumbo was as POTUS and the shit he did that lib-retards conveniently want to forget he did as they hysterically denigrate Trump for doing the same things that Odumbo did while they hypocritically said nothing.

Odumbo has a glee club of academics at his disposal. Some articles at Wikipedia are guarded by the likes of David Brock and his lot. Thinking that you would actually get an honest and unbiased opinion from such a group is unbelievably foolish.

The article I cited with the rankings was not produced by Wikipedia. Wikipedia is simply publishing those several rankings without regard to the content.

I do not like Trump so I would be one of the last people to ask for a unbiased opinion of his performance as POTUS. On the other hand, there are people on this forum whom I would not ask for an unbiased opinion of Obama. I will defer to 3rd parties who are knowledgeable on the subject and relatively unbiased.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

The article I cited with the rankings was not produced by Wikipedia. Wikipedia is simply publishing those several rankings without regard to the content.

I do not like Trump so I would be one of the last people to ask for a unbiased opinion of his performance as POTUS. On the other hand, there are people on this forum whom I would not ask for an unbiased opinion of Obama. I will defer to 3rd parties who are knowledgeable on the subject and relatively unbiased.

I don't give a fuck that Wiki didn't do the poll. The editors at Wiki are lib-retards, and they control what's published on Wiki.

Plus, it's an established fact that academics on today's college campuses are lib-retards. Any poll conducted by academics today has an inborn bias against conservatives and for lib-retards like Odumbo.

History will judge Odumbo harshly as a true evaluation of his weaponization of U.S. agencies against political opponents becomes known ... in addition to his contribution to nuclear proliferation in Iran.

Odumbo didn't stop Putin in Crimea. Odumbo didn't stop Putin in Ukraine. Odumbo didn't stop Putin in Syria. And Odumbo did nothing when Iran seized two U.S. boats in the Persian Gulf.