Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 316
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 302
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71370
biomed167980
Yssup Rider62981
gman4455079
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49530
WTF48272
pyramider46430
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid40073
CryptKicker37400
Mokoa36507
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34572

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-04-2017, 11:19 AM   #16
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

he answered that
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 11:22 AM   #17
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT Pockets View Post
I have one question that if answered would say a lot about Comey.
Did he know about any surveillance or investigation into Trump before the election. If so then why did he chose to only disclose Hillary's?
What does the answer "disclose" about Comey?
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 11:52 AM   #18
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
What does the answer "disclose" about Comey?
on wolfe blitzer's show yesterday diane feintstein was on

wolfe asked her what evidence do you have that trump or his campaign colluded with the Russians..i think she gave a one word answer..."none"

here's comey's explanation below, notice he uses the term Clinton investigation and Russian (Not Trump) investigation (why would he say Trump was being investigated when the investigation was concerning the Russians anyway?):

"I commented, as I explained earlier, on October 28 in a letter that I sent to the chair and ranking [members] of the oversight committees that we were taking additional steps in the Clinton email investigation because I had testified under oath repeatedly that we were done — that we were finished there," Comey said.

"With respect to the Russia investigation, we treated it like we did with the Clinton investigation. We didn't say a word about it until months into it, and then the only thing we've confirmed so far about this is — the same thing as with the Clinton investigation — that we are investigating.

"And I would expect that we're not going to say another peep about it until we're done. And I don't know what will be said when we're done, but that's how we handled the Clinton investigation as well."
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 12:11 PM   #19
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought View Post
....
"And I would expect that we're not going to say another peep about it until we're done. And I don't know what will be said when we're done, but that's how we handled the Clinton investigation as well."
... that's factually incorrect.

He testified .... he brought it up again the weekend before the election because more (6,000 + ) emails were "found" and had to be reviewed .... so they weren't "done"!~ And more importantly, at least one person beside Hillary LIED to the FBI agents "investigating" her emails about the existence of classified emails on her server, which ended up on the laptop of the her aids pervert husband .... so two others were in possession of classified material without permissions!

That means: The investigation is STILL ONGOING!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 12:15 PM   #20
bamscram
Valued Poster
 
bamscram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 23, 2016
Location: north KCMO
Posts: 5,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rey Lengua View Post
And you didn't deny anything that I posted, so I must be right on the money about YOU EKIM ! Keep crowing " ANYCOCK'LDO " !
Nothing you post makes any sense except to you. why should I bother denying it?
Stick to dick gobbling ekim, dumbest member on the forum.
Have you tried MTpockets he might let you blow him.
bamscram is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 12:17 PM   #21
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamscram View Post
Nothing you post makes any sense except to you.
.. according to you! So, what?
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 12:24 PM   #22
bamscram
Valued Poster
 
bamscram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 23, 2016
Location: north KCMO
Posts: 5,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
.. according to you! So, what?
You will get credit for another useless post,shooting got 32,000?
bamscram is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 01:08 PM   #23
MT Pockets
Valued Poster
 
MT Pockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 9, 2016
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,234
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
What does the answer "disclose" about Comey?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
... that's factually incorrect.

He testified .... he brought it up again the weekend before the election because more (6,000 + ) emails were "found" and had to be reviewed .... so they weren't "done"!~ And more importantly, at least one person beside Hillary LIED to the FBI agents "investigating" her emails about the existence of classified emails on her server, which ended up on the laptop of the her aids pervert husband .... so two others were in possession of classified material without permissions!

That means: The investigation is STILL ONGOING!
As I can see by your comments you concluded that he did not handle both cases the same. He spoke about Hillary when it would hurt her and kept quite about The Russian deal. In my opinion even if he left Trumps name out of it. The Public would have found out they were Attempting to help Trump.
MT Pockets is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 01:12 PM   #24
Player
Gaining Momentum
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 32
Default Waste of time

This hearing was a total waste of time. Comey wouldn't answer any of the real questions in a public forum.
Player is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 02:05 PM   #25
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT Pockets View Post
As I can see by your comments you concluded that he did not handle both cases the same.
Well, I guess if his BOSS had invited Trump for a "one-on-one" about "how the younins were doin" then I suppose the two cases would have been handled about the same .... but as a practical matter his hand was forced by the inappropriate behavior of his "BOSS" and the Clintons .... and I doubt the FBI or the Feds handle all cases "THE SAME"!

Did I mention "Martha Stewart"? .... Or Petraeus.

Actually, when he announced that the Feds couldn't prosecute her without direct evidence of intent on HillaryNoMore's part ... I "concluded" he didn't handle "her case" the same as probably 90% of the other Federal prosecutions ... including those HE PROSECUTED AS a U.S. Attorney.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 02:24 PM   #26
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

.... When Comey announced HillaryNoMore couldn't be prosecuted without direct evidence of "intent," I concluded he didn't handle her case the same as about 90% of the other Federal cases prosecuted, including those he handled as a U.S. Attorney.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 02:45 PM   #27
MT Pockets
Valued Poster
 
MT Pockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 9, 2016
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,234
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Well, I guess if his BOSS had invited Trump for a "one-on-one" about "how the younins were doin" then I suppose the two cases would have been handled about the same .... but as a practical matter his hand was forced by the inappropriate behavior of his "BOSS" and the Clintons .... and I doubt the FBI or the Feds handle all cases "THE SAME"!

Did I mention "Martha Stewart"? .... Or Petraeus.

Actually, when he announced that the Feds couldn't prosecute her without direct evidence of intent on HillaryNoMore's part ... I "concluded" he didn't handle "her case" the same as probably 90% of the other Federal prosecutions ... including those HE PROSECUTED AS a U.S. Attorney.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
.... When Comey announced HillaryNoMore couldn't be prosecuted without direct evidence of "intent," I concluded he didn't handle her case the same as about 90% of the other Federal cases prosecuted, including those he handled as a U.S. Attorney.
Trying to stay on point, I am saying this not as an insult but as a honest comparison. You sound like a sound bite from Shawn Spicer. You have strung together irrelevant factors. If Comey wanted to stay non -partisan he would not have added personal opinions and not said anything about the Weiner deal. And by his convictions to tell us about it he should have told us about the Russian?Trump deal as well.
MT Pockets is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 04:20 PM   #28
MT Pockets
Valued Poster
 
MT Pockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 9, 2016
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,234
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamscram View Post
Nothing you post makes any sense except to you. why should I bother denying it?
Stick to dick gobbling ekim, dumbest member on the forum.
Have you tried MTpockets he might let you blow him.
Have you seen that Fuckers teeth? Not a chance, he has sucked so many dicks he is starting to look like one.
MT Pockets is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 07:48 PM   #29
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 40,073
Encounters: 1
Default

it's becoming clear Lynch pressured Comey not to press charges against Clinton. and he didn't like her partisanship .. she was acting like a Clinton ally, which she was.

NY Times Story Confirms Loretta Lynch Acted Like a Partisan Hack, Not an Attorney General

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/20...partisan-hack/


now Lynch's chickens come back to roost!
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 08:37 PM   #30
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,475
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
it's becoming clear Lynch pressured Comey not to press charges against Clinton. and he didn't like her partisanship .. she was acting like a Clinton ally, which she was.

NY Times Story Confirms Loretta Lynch Acted Like a Partisan Hack, Not an Attorney General

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/20...partisan-hack/

now Lynch's chickens come back to roost!

Yeah... I liked the part where Comey is ribbed after listening to Lynch's semantical bullshit... "I guess you're the Federal Bureau of Matters now!"

That entire NYT story is fascinating reading for anyone who genuinely wants to figure out Comey's thinking over the past 2 years. Here's the link:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/u...tion.html?_r=0
lustylad is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved