Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
408 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
George Spelvin |
310 |
Starscream66 |
300 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
sharkman29 |
262 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 71316 | biomed1 | 67568 | Yssup Rider | 62768 | gman44 | 54964 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 49462 | WTF | 48272 | pyramider | 46416 | bambino | 45243 | The_Waco_Kid | 39792 | CryptKicker | 37388 | Mokoa | 36499 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Dr-epg | 34042 |
|
|
04-19-2017, 01:46 PM
|
#16
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLouie
The district lines were drawn by the state republicans so it would always be conservative. That he was able to get 48.9 percent of the vote should not have been possible. This was a huge loss for the Republicans and they know it
|
I'm curious about your definition of "huge loss". The goal has not been reached, no one has won but when you count what the contest has cost so far and how much more it is going to cost....well, that's another matter. The democrats paid $86 per vote and lost. How much is a "win" going to cost them. Add in the fact that this does not change anything in the House and the "win" is only good until the next election plus the reputations that have already been tarnished...this guy should have won by double digits! We're looking at close to $20 million for something that only means sometime inside the House seating chart. If he wins...
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 01:48 PM
|
#17
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK
Now see here....never mind. I hope a couple of liberals on the court die soon while we still have a chance to save this country.
.
|
They better hurry up n die....not sure how much longer the GOP will control the Senate#
.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 01:56 PM
|
#18
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Oct 2, 2014
Location: san antonio tx
Posts: 1,665
|
After the next election it should be roughly Republican controlled 55-45 .....
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 01:56 PM
|
#19
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
They better hurry up n die....not sure how much longer the GOP will control the Senate#
.
|
The dim-retards will be be doing well to hold onto what they have.
Quote:
Democrats up for reelection in 2018:
- California: Dianne Feinstein (Won by 63% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 83
- Connecticut: Chris Murphy (Won by 55% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 43
- Delaware: Tom Carper (Won by 66% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 70
- Florida: Bill Nelson (Won by 55% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 74
- Hawaii: Mazie Hirono (Won by 63% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 69
- Indiana: Joe Donnelly (Won by 50% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 61
- Maryland: Ben Cardin (Won by 56% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 73
- Massachusetts: Elizabeth Warren (Won by 54% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 67
- Michigan: Debbie Stabenow (Won by 59% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 66
- Minnesota: Amy Klobuchar (Won by 65% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 56
- Missouri: Claire McCaskill (Won by 55% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 63
- Montana: Jon Tester (Won by 49% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 60
- New Jersey: Bob Menendez (Won by 59% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 63
- New Mexico: Martin Heinrich (Won by 51% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 45
- New York: Kirsten Gillibrand (Won by 72% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 50
- North Dakota: Heidi Heitkamp (Won by 50% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 61
- Ohio: Sherrod Brown (Won by 51% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 64
- Pennsylvania: Bob Casey Jr. (Won by 54% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 56
- Rhode Island: Sheldon Whitehouse (Won by 64% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 61
- Virginia: Tom Kaine (Won by 53% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 58
- Washington: Maria Cantwell (Won by 61% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 58
- West Virginia: Joe Manchin (Won by 61% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 69
- Wisconsin: Tammy Baldwin (Won by 51% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 54
Independents up for reelection in 2018:
- Maine: Angus King (Won by 53% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 72
- Vermont: Bernie Sanders (Won by 71% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age:75
Republicans up for reelection in 2018:
- Alabama: Luther Strange (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 63
- Arizona: Jeff Flake (Won by 49% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 54
- Mississippi: Roger Wicker (Won by 57% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 65
- Nebraska: Deb Fischer (Won by 56% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 65
- Nevada: Dean Heller (Won by 46% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 56
- Tennessee: Bob Corker (Won by 65% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 64
- Texas: Ted Cruz (Won by 57% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 46
- Utah: Orrin Hatch (Won by 65% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 82
- Wyoming: John Barrasso (Won by 76% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 64
|
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 02:03 PM
|
#20
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Oh yes there is....You and others are fools if you do not see this as a repeat of 2010.
.
|
So, ... you are the only one who sees it as ...
.."a repeat of 2010"?
It's all in the jury selection, right?
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 02:07 PM
|
#21
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLouie
This was a huge loss for the Republicans and they know it
|
BL do you also believe that ....
... the colder it gets is more proof of "global warming"?
"Jon-Jon" will lose in the runoff, and you'll still claim ...
"a huge loss for the Republicans"!
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 02:23 PM
|
#22
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Duely noted I B...i amend my earlier comment.
They better hold off dying until 2020! That is an impossible map to overcome.
The Dems best hope to win it back the Senate is in 2020. If they win in back in 2018, it will mean the country is in a horrific tailspin.
.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 02:31 PM
|
#23
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I'm curious about your definition of "huge loss". The goal has not been reached, no one has won but when you count what the contest has cost so far and how much more it is going to cost....well, that's another matter. The democrats paid $86 per vote and lost. How much is a "win" going to cost them. Add in the fact that this does not change anything in the House and the "win" is only good until the next election plus the reputations that have already been tarnished...this guy should have won by double digits! We're looking at close to $20 million for something that only means sometime inside the House seating chart. If he wins...
|
You do understand, don't you, that BL believes HillariousNoMore WON! ... and the 2016 General Election was a "HUGE LOSS" for the Republicans?
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 05:08 PM
|
#24
|
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 39,792
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
You do understand, don't you, that BL believes HillariousNoMore WON! ... and the 2016 General Election was a "HUGE LOSS" for the Republicans?
|
are you saying BL thinks the popular vote defines the election? bahahaa
so did Hillary it appears .. now shes a besotted old wino .. and Bill would rather jack off than poke that nasty bitch again .. if he ever did.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 05:22 PM
|
#25
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
I watched Jon Ossoff today, giving his "Victory Speech".
He was trying to copy that interrupted, staccato speech style of President Obama. It was comical.
He better keep his day job.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 05:42 PM
|
#26
|
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 39,792
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S
I watched Jon Ossoff today, giving his "Victory Speech".
He was trying to copy that interrupted, staccato speech style of President Obama. It was comical.
He better keep his day job.
|
you mean his teleprompter was short-circuiting?
bahhaaa
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 05:44 PM
|
#27
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
Democrats up for reelection in 2018:
States in red won by Trump
- California: Dianne Feinstein (Won by 63% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 83
- Connecticut: Chris Murphy (Won by 55% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 43
- Delaware: Tom Carper (Won by 66% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 70
- Florida: Bill Nelson (Won by 55% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 74
- Hawaii: Mazie Hirono (Won by 63% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 69
- Indiana: Joe Donnelly (Won by 50% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 61
- Maryland: Ben Cardin (Won by 56% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 73
- Massachusetts: Elizabeth Warren (Won by 54% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 67
- Michigan: Debbie Stabenow (Won by 59% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 66
- Minnesota: Amy Klobuchar (Won by 65% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 56
- Missouri: Claire McCaskill (Won by 55% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 63
- Montana: Jon Tester (Won by 49% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 60
- New Jersey: Bob Menendez (Won by 59% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 63
- New Mexico: Martin Heinrich (Won by 51% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 45
- New York: Kirsten Gillibrand (Won by 72% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 50
- North Dakota: Heidi Heitkamp (Won by 50% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 61
- Ohio: Sherrod Brown (Won by 51% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 64
- Pennsylvania: Bob Casey Jr. (Won by 54% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 56
- Rhode Island: Sheldon Whitehouse (Won by 64% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 61
- Virginia: Tom Kaine (Won by 53% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 58
- Washington: Maria Cantwell (Won by 61% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 58
- West Virginia: Joe Manchin (Won by 61% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 69
- Wisconsin: Tammy Baldwin (Won by 51% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 54
Independents up for reelection in 2018:
- Maine: Angus King (Won by 53% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 72
- Vermont: Bernie Sanders (Won by 71% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age:75
Republicans up for reelection in 2018:
- Alabama: Luther Strange (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 63
- Arizona: Jeff Flake (Won by 49% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 54
- Mississippi: Roger Wicker (Won by 57% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 65
- Nebraska: Deb Fischer (Won by 56% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 65
- Nevada: Dean Heller (Won by 46% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 56
- Tennessee: Bob Corker (Won by 65% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 64
- Texas: Ted Cruz (Won by 57% in 2012) (Running in 2018) Current age: 46
- Utah: Orrin Hatch (Won by 65% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 82
- Wyoming: John Barrasso (Won by 76% in 2012) (Intent for 2018 unknown) Current age: 64
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-19-2017, 07:39 PM
|
#28
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLouie
The district lines were drawn by the state republicans so it would always be conservative. That he was able to get 48.9 percent of the vote should not have been possible. This was a huge loss for the Republicans and they know it
|
you also ignore that there were like 11 candidates in that race. all of them republicans.
its mathematically impossible to get 50.1 to win it out right.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-20-2017, 04:04 AM
|
#29
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
you also ignore that there were like 11 candidates in that race. all of them republicans.
its mathematically impossible to get 50.1 to win it out right.
|
You do understand, don't you, that the same crowd predicted HillariousNoMore would win by a landslide?
Wait until after the Special Election to hear:
"The Russians Did It!!!!"
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-20-2017, 07:20 AM
|
#30
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
they have unrealistic expectations that are too high.
I think theres enough to blame to go around.. the one in particular about an article predicting the so-called dominant democratic majority based on demographics. I think that led them astray.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|