US Interference in Other's Elections

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by DSK

Where in my assertion did I imply I wanted to be in one of the bullied regimes? I'm just pointing out our hypocrisy and hysteria concerning the Russian's mild attempt to sway our process.

Please note under the new heavy handed policing now applied in this forum, your insult could be considered an infraction, though I will refrain from reporting you in this instance.

Please report me in this instance, you niggling little coward! PLEASE!

Exactly which part? you know, I don't give a fuck. Report it! Hopefully the staff will realize that your comment was for their benefit and not mind.

And while you're at it, explain why ANY Russian attempt "to sway our process," is acceptable.

Bitch.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Trey

I am disappointed in some of you trumpers. Its one thing to support your guy. It's another to just roll over and let our elections take a dicking just cus your guy won. This can and will go the other way. Will you be ok with that?

One must suspect your sincerity or accept the fact that Darwinism would have eliminated your genes from the gene pool in an earlier time when society looked less kindly on the mentally disabled. To believe that foreign agents aren't going to exploit weakness when they see it is to be incredibly naive. Saying such an intrusion is an "act of war", as too many dim-retards are presently doing, and that people need die for this intrusion, is absurd. There is only one solution: better OPSEC -- which hildebeest and her crew demonstrably failed to execute. Hence, the onus for this failure is entirely on hildebeest and her crew. While you can argue all you want for retaliatory measures, remember, according to U.S. intelligence findings, that it was in "retaliation" that Russia did what it did; so, expect tit-for-tat. To imagine anything else is to live in fantasy land.

[Jackie S]

All Russia and WikiLeaks did was release info about Hillary that her bought and paid for lackeys in our Press would not.

We have a Free Press that has Constitutional Protection. It does not address the problem of of the Press being sold out to one particular idealology and one Political Party.

If our Press would have done it's job, there would have been anything for the Russians to "Hack".

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

One must suspect your sincerity or accept the fact that Darwinism would have eliminated your genes from the gene pool in an earlier time when society looked less kindly on the mentally disabled. To believe that foreign agents aren't going to exploit weakness when they see it is to be incredibly naive. Saying such an intrusion is an "act of war", as too many dim-retards are presently doing, and that people need die for this intrusion, is absurd. There is only one solution: better OPSEC -- which hildebeest and her crew demonstrably failed to execute. Hence, the onus for this failure is entirely on hildebeest and her crew. While you can argue all you want for retaliatory measures, remember, according to U.S. intelligence findings, that it was in "retaliation" that Russia did what it did; so, expect tit-for-tat. To imagine anything else is to live in fantasy land.

YEP. The hypocrisy is strong with this one...

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

All Russia and WikiLeaks did was release info about Hillary that her bought and paid for lackeys in our Press would not.

We have a Free Press that has Constitutional Protection. It does not address the problem of of the Press being sold out to one particular idealology and one Political Party.

If our Press would have done it's job, there would have been anything for the Russians to "Hack".

Really? I seriously doubt we have a "Free Press" anymore.

Just check with Twitler. He's doing everything he can to suppress the "Free Press."

But it seems like you support Twitler's invitation to hack the DNC and HRC.

What about the fucking constitution? Do you think it makes provisions for the "Free Press" doing its job?

Your argument makes no sense at all.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Please report me in this instance, you niggling little coward! PLEASE!

Exactly which part? you know, I don't give a fuck. Report it! Hopefully the staff will realize that your comment was for their benefit and not mind.

And while you're at it, explain why ANY Russian attempt "to sway our process," is acceptable.

Bitch.

Why would you want me to report this post of yours, when the material you provided would seem to violate the new policy?

It would result in you getting banned, which would be good for the community, no doubt.

[prohibited words]

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Please report me in this instance, you niggling little coward! PLEASE!

Exactly which part? you know, I don't give a fuck. Report it! Hopefully the staff will realize that your comment was for their benefit and not mind.

And while you're at it, explain why ANY Russian attempt "to sway our process," is acceptable.

Bitch.

Don't be such an absolutist. They could have done many things that would have crossed the line, but merely tricking Podesta into giving up his email password and then publishing the idiotic things he said is fair game.

Didn't President Obama approve the tapping of Angela Merkel's phone?

You are a [prohibited words]

[DSK]

Originally Posted by WTF

The difference being , Trump will not show his tax returns and sure seems to be Putins little bitch...

Trump is far more clever than you realize. You boys keep hyping his returns, and he will dribble out little bits of it too keep on embarrassing you people.

[prohibited words]

[Yssup Rider]

and Trump's lemmings will follow him right off the cliff.

Devin Nunes will actually precede Twitler.

Chris Christie and Rudy Giuliani must be happier than shit that Twitler already kicked them to the curb. They live to suck another day.

(No prohibited words).

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by DSK

Don't be such an absolutist. They could have done many things that would have crossed the line, but merely tricking Podesta into giving up his email password and then publishing the idiotic things he said is fair game.

Didn't President Obama approve the tapping of Angela Merkel's phone?

You are a [prohibited words]

May?

You "may" have inferred the "N" word several dozen times. Is that fair game?

There is NO circumstance under which it's OK for Russia or any other foreign government to hack our institutions and citizens, public or private.

I'd think a freedom-loving "American" like you "may" agree, JL.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

YEP. The hypocrisy is strong with this one...

Everyone has known that you are an unabashed hypocrite for a very long time. You voted for hildebeest who demonstrated that she couldn't protect national secrets in accordance with this laws and regulations even if her presidential campaign depended on it! Look what that got her!

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by DSK

Trump is far more clever than you realize. You boys keep hyping his returns, and he will dribble out little bits of it too keep on embarrassing you people.

[prohibited words]

President Trump said last night that he didn't realize politics would be so much fun.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yep. Until you let this go, it's gonna happen EVERY FUCKING TIME YOU BUMP THIS THREAD. .

NOW ITS GONNA HAPPEN AGAIN.

Now run along and post some fake shit about other people.

thanks, "mamboola."

LLIarMan... give it up for fucks sake!

[lustylad]

Welcome back, DSK!

[Yssup Rider]

You are dumber than a bag of hammers, aren't you, Junior!

HAHAHAHAHAHA!