The Character Test - Was It Wrong To Kill Off The Indians; Take Their Land and Establish American Law

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by DSK

We shouldn't have killed them except in self defense. They did not believe in ownership of the land, and now they have very valuable land reserved for them, so they came out ahead.

I would be willing to bet they mostly regret that we imported African slaves and set them free on their land.

Your opinions, while you're free to have them, illustrate why multiculturalism doesn't work. The races will never get along with one another and forgive the other racial groups for injustices real or imagined.

we did try that but those "peaceful" Indians SissyChimp vainly tries to defend would attack settlers. they'd attack other Indian tribes too. what about that, SissyChump??

the Comanche several times devastated Spanish forces moving north into current day Texas.

now let's look at Africa shall we? Black kills Black every day in Africa. has been for a thousand years. i'm surprised there's anyone left alive over there. so SissyChimp, are you cool with Blacks killing Blacks? Indians killing Indians? Indians killing settlers who then killed them nasty tribers in self defense?

you have flunked your own character test! baahaaa maybe you should have called Clinton to get the answer to the debate question!! bahaaa


DIE DIE DIE u fat gay beast!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Obama a racist? Ha! might as well call Jesus a racist while you're at it. I must say nice deflection attempt way from my OP. Maybe this will help you get back on track:

Shit-Stained Chapped-ass has only an elementary knowledge of history:




Confederate Reunion in 1903, banner inscription: “Cherokee Veteran Indians of Thomas’ Legion, 69 N.C. Regiment, Suo-Noo-Kee Camp U.C.V. 4th Brigade, N.C. Division”

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Obama a racist? Ha! might as well call Jesus a racist while you're at it. I must say nice deflection attempt way from my OP. Maybe this will help you get back on track:

Historically, military conquest has been an accepted means of garnishing new land and wealth.

There is nothing inherently racist about it. African Tribes warned sgainst each other for centuries. The indigenous peoples of the Americas engaged in brutal subjugation of those weaker. Asians, especially the Mongols and Chinese, went back and forth in wars of conquest in attempts to gain land, wealth, and power ever since man started keeping records.

The great Muslim Empire at one time stretched from Asia Minor to Spain. How do you suppose they did that?

Don't be so naive when it comes to human nature. It is the one constant throughout history. Times change, empires come and go, civilization marches on.

But the one constant throughout the history of mankind, the one thing that compels us to covet what we don't have, is human nature.

Always remember. Those who beat their swords into plowshares will soon be plowing for those that do not. It's the nature of the beast.

There is nothing "racist" about it. All categories of human kind participate.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

So let's look at this from a different perspective. Lots of you overt and closet racists like to only talk black and white issues as it pertains to African Slavery and Black Americans but let me throw a monkey wrench in your thought process to root out your real character for all to see.

So how about it?

Was coming to this land as immigrants, killing off the Indians from sea to shining sea and then establishing a "New World Order" or "Law" was that cool in your eyes. Was it the right thing to do? Are you ok with that?

I'd like for the real racists to come out of the closet now because I'd respect you more if you did. I respect David Duke more than I respect a lot of you to be honest...because at least he's honest about his hatred.

When the Asians crossed that frozen Land-Bridge up north and entered North America and then killed the inhabitants of this continent, is who you should be talking too... shitistan mosque... of course they have been gone for 20,000 years so let's talk about Rwanda. You know something close to your home?

[Muscleup]

It's called "the right of conquest". It's how societies were formed back in the day.

One can go back to any country and view its past and see something similar.

OP's point is feckless.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Muscleup

It's called "the right of conquest". It's how societies were formed back in the day.

One can go back to any country and view its past and see something similar.

OP's point is feckless.

it's also been referred to as "To the victors go the spoils of War".

what's the historical lesson here?? WIN.

[Muscleup]

Slavery was bad. (Of course)

However, if you are an AA, would you rather be in Africa or America?

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

When the Asians crossed that frozen Land-Bridge up north and entered North America and then killed the inhabitants of this continent, is who you should be talking too... shitistan mosque... of course they have been gone for 20,000 years so let's talk about Rwanda. You know something close to your home?

that would be the Clovis people from France who settled here first. they were prolly wiped out in a later migration wave by the Asians.

[Revenant]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

^ so what you're really saying is that in ohh let's say another 100 years we should all be OK with the murders of innocent Americans carried out at 911.

No, mope, I'm not saying that. Stop trying to put words in other people's mouths.

But you know what? In another 100 years, no American is going to be bitching and moaning and demanding that Muslims continue to apologize for something that happened 116 years earlier.

Do you hear any American's complaining about the sinking of the Lusitania and demanding to know if the German people are sufficiently repentant?

No, you don't. Because the past is the past and we have moved on.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Revenant

NIn another 100 years, no American is going to be bitching and moaning and demanding that Muslims continue to apologize for something that happened 116 years earlier.

SissyLips just wants a lump sum welfare check, that's all.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

Historically, military conquest has been an accepted means of garnishing new land and wealth.

There is nothing inherently racist about it. African Tribes warned sgainst each other for centuries. The indigenous peoples of the Americas engaged in brutal subjugation of those weaker. Asians, especially the Mongols and Chinese, went back and forth in wars of conquest in attempts to gain land, wealth, and power ever since man started keeping records.

The great Muslim Empire at one time stretched from Asia Minor to Spain. How do you suppose they did that?

Don't be so naive when it comes to human nature. It is the one constant throughout history. Times change, empires come and go, civilization marches on.

But the one constant throughout the history of mankind, the one thing that compels us to covet what we don't have, is human nature.

Always remember. Those who beat their swords into plowshares will soon be plowing for those that do not. It's the nature of the beast.

There is nothing "racist" about it. All categories of human kind participate.

That's correct. What bothers me are all the broken treaties. That's wrong.

[pyramider]

Originally Posted by Muscleup

Slavery was bad. (Of course)

However, if you are an AA, would you rather be in Africa or America?

You forgot to mention that the Muslims were enslaving Africans long before the Europeans started buying Africans in Western Africa.

[tonyvicksa]

Shitstain et al - Watch this movie. It does a great job of explaining the Indians (feathers not dots).

[nevergaveitathought]

i would offer this:

every nation on earth was established by right of conquest

indian tribes carved out their territory by fighting and killing other Indians

tribes in Africa killed and conquered other tribes to establish their territories

Mexicans fought and killed and conquered mestizos and aztecs and anyone else in their way

but its just white people who are bad? why, because they were much more successful in establishing viable societies that third worlders want to come to and have created beacons of human hope?

[gary5912]

Originally Posted by Muscleup

Slavery was bad. (Of course)

However, if you are an AA, would you rather be in Africa or America?

They should be kissing the white mans ass and thanking him