Sharing ROS info with Providers!!

[Guest021121]

Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

If I've said it once.... I've said it a million times...
Hobby Shandle and mandle
Hobby Shandle and mandle
Hobby Shandle and mandle
Hobby Shandle and mandle


There's no reason for a shandle or mandle there. Too many guys willing to give up info due to a text or PM from a lady.
Depends on who gives ya the points... GP's were always sour, so they needed a dollop of Pistol Pete's cotton candy points... Fuckin Pistolero... I wish he dropped in here every once in a while!!
More recipes are available in Chapter 71:


Interestingly, there is another site in Upset where the girls are allowed (gasp) access to read the reviews of themselves and other providers. And... double gasp... the girls are allowed to post in those reviews as well!!! fuckin shocking... not sure how something radical like THAT is going to work out... whew...

Well it did happen there, albeit after putting the onus on the OP initially, but double tracked back and took some of the responsibility.

[JONBALLS]

if its so great elsewhere


then why the need to spend ANY time here?



seems like sour grapes mainly

that parts funny as hell

[cuseguy95]

Originally Posted by SeekingFun69

I have no problem with the providers being able to read the ROS as it keeps both parties more honest.

I was more active on another board when I hobbied in NYC more frequently and not only could providers read the reviews, they could comment as well. You can learn a lot based on how a provider responds to a negative review. To me, this board is truly the most bizarrely run of any escort review site I have ever been on.

The main purpose of a review is:
1) is she legit (accurate description/pic) or LE/junkie
2) services provided and cost
3) attitude
4) everything else is jack off material for the lurkers and wannabe hobbiests.

I tend to agree with this. If a negative review is written politely (as I have seen on another board), the provider has a chance to respond politely (which she did), and it goes on from there.

It isn't an information exchange when we get one side of the story.

[jokacz]

Originally Posted by JONBALLS

if its so great elsewhere


then why the need to spend ANY time here?

For the same reason we have to look at car wrecks.

[Next Best Thing]

Allowing the hooks to know what is being said about them is not really bad for business it's just an example of male guilt and gender pussification.

I assume most of the men who do this are interested in dramatics and improving their credibility with the hooks, which is not only pitiful but worthless. Many of the hooks have openly stated that the ass kissing routine gets a paying customer nowhere.

Most likely it's another example of men viewing this as something greater than a business transaction. Smart hooks take full advantageof this, look at Kay-Kay for example.

[Guest072118]

In the big picture who cares who leaked anything, its a free hooker site, its certainly not a professional environment... The ROS is not sacred. If you think that on a free hook site that lets members 'beat' on each other... well...

[Ceremony]

I don't pay for sex to have drama. So this is a none issue. Don't ask don't Tell.

[Next Best Thing]

You've got to give at least some credit to ElleW and her small battalion of male lesbians for speaking their minds about how this site is run, the oppressive rules, and the like. Especially the way they bravely taunt the weakling Mods.

These fuckers have some nerve imposing rules on these pioneers. They treat them like little children and it's not right.

No matter how much and how liberally they let fat hookers advertise for free, and allow pseudo-males their run of the place, nothing is going to make up for these fucking rules.

It's a form of slavery or indentured servitude if you let your mind free and think about it.

Fat Ugly Hooker Lives Matter.

Pussified Male Lesbian Lives Matter.

Get it straight.

[Highwayman64]

Originally Posted by ElleW

In the big picture who cares who leaked anything, its a free hooker site, its certainly not a professional environment... The ROS is not sacred. If you think that on a free hook site that lets members 'beat' on each other... well...

Perhaps some may think that it is not sacred, but as long as guidelines here state ROS is not to be put in open forum, we expect members here to comply.

[Bonfirenut]

sa·cred
ˈsākrəd/
adjective
connected with God (or the gods) or dedicated to a religious purpose and so deserving veneration.
"sacred rites"
synonyms: holy, hallowed, blessed, consecrated, sanctified, venerated, revered; archaicblest
"the priest entered the sacred place"
religious rather than secular.
"sacred music"
synonyms: religious, spiritual, devotional, church, ecclesiastical
"sacred music"
(of writing or text) embodying the laws or doctrines of a religion.
"a sacred Hindu text"

Anything referred in this forum as Sacred....lmfao

[Ellie Sin]

Maybe we should consider a Review type Story area for the ladies as well.?

[keeponrisin]

Originally Posted by Ellie Sin

Maybe we should consider a Review type Story area for the ladies as well.?

All you have to do is start a thread in this section and critique away
Just don't say anything negative about me
I think it could be bad for buisness.. cutting down us egotists but I'm sure there would be some interesting reads

[ISO]

Originally Posted by Ellie Sin

Maybe we should consider a Review type Story area for the ladies as well.?

If you do it in the Ladies Room, then none of us can read what you say about us like you can't see what we say in reviews of you.

[MountainGoat]

Originally Posted by ISO

If you do it in the Ladies Room, then none of us can read what you say about us like you can't see what we say in reviews of you.

well in theory, at least.

[Guest072323]

Originally Posted by ISO

If you do it in the Ladies Room, then none of us can read what you say about us like you can't see what we say in reviews of you.

Yup....