Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Spaulding
I always treat the ladies ( you notice I don't marginize them calling them provider) with respect and courtesy.
|
You don't marginalize me by referring to my job title. Recognizing that this is my job, just like any other, is probably the first step in *not* marginalizing sex workers. We use the term "provider" here and elsewhere because "escort" has been outed, and it carries a very low negative connotation, if any at all. I have seen the term in use for well over a decade, and in that time I personally haven't seen men call women "provgars" or something weird--what would that word even look like?
Although I *totally* want to tattoo "LADY" on my knuckles, the word "lady" does come with a lot of baggage, and its history puts women in a place *in relation to* men, not in their own solvent world. A "lady" is a passive object. If anything, the strongest connotations we have of "provider" are as a synonym for "breadwinner," which, when we get into the etymology, is a hell of a lot more respectful of a term than "lady."
My intent is not to disparage "lady" (I like the word, I call myself a lady, I say "ladies," to groups of women because it is polite). I simply want to show you that if what you intend to do is respect us through language, you'll need to know more about your language.
"Provider" is not a dirty word.