Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 263
sharkman29 251
George Spelvin 248
Top Posters
DallasRain71328
biomed167650
Yssup Rider62821
gman4454991
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49475
WTF48272
pyramider46416
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid39844
CryptKicker37389
Mokoa36499
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34151

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2014, 10:57 AM   #16
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default Plausible explanation by "Anonymous".

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) had previously declined to confirm or deny the existence of the documents in the FOIA suit in question. This type of response is called a "Glomar" response and is used when the fact of the existence of the documents is itself exempt from disclosure. That defense was overruled by Judge Jackson, so TIGTA responded by identifying (not "finding") 2,509 PAGES of documents (not 2,509 documents). The 2,509 pages of documents now at issue in the FOIA lawsuit pertain to TIGTA's investigations of alleged unlawful disclosures of tax returns and return information to the WH. Unless one or more of the aforesaid investigations became public because of a public prosecution in the federal courts, the documents--though acknowledged--will remain confidential because of the applicable federal law (IRC 6103(a)). Federal law clearly permits the WH to obtain tax returns and return information (IRC 6103(g)). The vast majority of tax returns and return information provided to the WH is in connection with the vetting of presidential appointees. Why?

Every person hired to work at the WH, and every potential presidential appointee must undergo a “tax check.” Tax check information consists of tax returns and return information and is–quite properly and necessarily–reviewed by the WH personnel staff charged with vetting the appointee. “Tax check” information, by its very nature, is tax return information protected by IRC § 6103 and its disclosure to and inspection by the WH is authorized under IRC § 6103(g). Given that there are approximately 7,000 political appointees who must be vetted, one would expect at least that many disclosures of “tax check” documents to the WH.


http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/68040
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 12:36 PM   #17
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) had previously declined to confirm or deny the existence of the documents in the FOIA suit in question. This type of response is called a "Glomar" response and is used when the fact of the existence of the documents is itself exempt from disclosure. That defense was overruled by Judge Jackson, so TIGTA responded by identifying (not "finding") 2,509 PAGES of documents (not 2,509 documents). The 2,509 pages of documents now at issue in the FOIA lawsuit pertain to TIGTA's investigations of alleged unlawful disclosures of tax returns and return information to the WH. Unless one or more of the aforesaid investigations became public because of a public prosecution in the federal courts, the documents--though acknowledged--will remain confidential because of the applicable federal law (IRC 6103(a)). Federal law clearly permits the WH to obtain tax returns and return information (IRC 6103(g)). The vast majority of tax returns and return information provided to the WH is in connection with the vetting of presidential appointees. Why?

Every person hired to work at the WH, and every potential presidential appointee must undergo a “tax check.” Tax check information consists of tax returns and return information and is–quite properly and necessarily–reviewed by the WH personnel staff charged with vetting the appointee. “Tax check” information, by its very nature, is tax return information protected by IRC § 6103 and its disclosure to and inspection by the WH is authorized under IRC § 6103(g). Given that there are approximately 7,000 political appointees who must be vetted, one would expect at least that many disclosures of “tax check” documents to the WH.


http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/68040

"Anonymous" are Ozombie King facilitators... who knew?
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 03:56 PM   #18
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,821
Encounters: 68
Default

Is this another CANADA FREE PRESS thread?

SNICK!
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 12-07-2014, 02:29 PM   #19
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

AmericanThinker...

December 6, 2014
The IRS Scandal Is Not Going Away
By Bruce Walker

The IRS scandal is not much in the news these days, but it is not going away. The more Obama’s minions stonewall this scandal, the more congressional Democrats discount the scandal, the more the leftist establishment media ignores this scandal, the more toxic it will be for the left. In late November we learned that 30,000 of Lois Lerner’s lost e-mails have been found, but these e-mails have not yet been converted into readable form.

The utter contempt the Obama administration shows toward the oversight powers of Congress, toward the millions of information technology-savvy Americans who grasp the lying and silly explanations provided by the administration, and toward federal judges who have ordered serious explanations for presumably “destroyed” e-mails is breathtaking and appalling.



Once the new Republican Congress convenes in a few weeks, its leaders would do well to create a joint committee on the IRS scandal, elevating it to the highest levels of congressional action and putting the mendacious IRS flacks covering for Obama in an even more desperate situation – compounding lies already told to a House committee with new and flimsier lies told to a joint committee of House and Senate members.

Congressional Democrats on that committee who continue to parrot the transparent lies of IRS officials at some point become complicit in the cover-up of criminal misconduct – not in the legal sense, exactly, but certainly in the political sense. Individual members might lose re-election or might find themselves discounted for any higher positions in government if they are seen as toadies for these Obama crooks. Yet once Democrats begin to join in the chorus of Republicans in demanding real answers and agreeing that there is real wrongdoing, the whole defense of this investigation being a partisan witch hunt vanishes.

The leftist establishment media, by continuing to ignore the scandal and downplay the significance of this investigation, risks the last little fig leaf of notional journalistic competence and integrity. Their utter obliviousness to fetid swamps of official misconduct could become the “real story” as this scandal unfolds. Treating federal judges with contempt is also dangerous, because these judges have tools to force compliance that work.

The real threat, however, comes from the knowledge that an incoming Republican administration in two years will be able to really investigate the cover-up and open up all the files currently kept from Congress and the courts. There will, at that point, be absolutely nothing to protect those officials who have played “kick the can” on the theory that the public will forget about all this. Federal prosecutors can then seek indictments of officials who have obstructed congressional investigations or obstructed justice.

Although some conservatives may fear a blanket presidential pardon to all those involved, after the November 2016 election, of course, this will not make the scandal go away. It may, in fact, make the scandal even more transparent. There would, at that point, be no privilege against self-incrimination that any of the guilty officials could use to hide the truth. All those involved could be ordered to answer questions, put in jail if they refused, and convicted of perjury if they lied under oath (any pardon could not address future crimes like perjury).

These bad actors could also be sued in civil actions – no presidential pardon can protect against private lawsuits – and as more of the ugly mess oozes out, the seriousness of the civil wrongdoing will become clearer. Big money judgments could be awarded against these thugs who bully citizens, and no one will have much sympathy for them. As the extent of the scandal grows, there will be increasing pressure for bar associations to disbar all the attorneys, like Lois Lerner, who were up to their necks in the muck of this scandal.

All of these realities will make it increasingly likely that some of the people now hiding malfeasance and dishonesty by IRS officials and the White House will crack before November 2016, bringing this scandal to center front in the presidential election. The need for putting the White House in Republican hands would then grow dramatically, rather like Watergate provided a strong argument that eight years of Republican presidential power was enough, when that presidential power was proven corrupt.

What makes this scandal worse for Democrats is that it is very easy for ordinary Americans to sink their teeth into: lying government officials, abuse of IRS power, and arrogant persecution of innocent countrymen by political thugs.

The IRS scandal is not going away…oh, boy, is it not going away!

The IRS scandal is not much in the news these days, but it is not going away. The more Obama’s minions stonewall this scandal, the more congressional Democrats discount the scandal, the more the leftist establishment media ignores this scandal, the more toxic it will be for the left. In late November we learned that 30,000 of Lois Lerner’s lost e-mails have been found, but these e-mails have not yet been converted into readable form.

The utter contempt the Obama administration shows toward the oversight powers of Congress, toward the millions of information technology-savvy Americans who grasp the lying and silly explanations provided by the administration, and toward federal judges who have ordered serious explanations for presumably “destroyed” e-mails is breathtaking and appalling.

Once the new Republican Congress convenes in a few weeks, its leaders would do well to create a joint committee on the IRS scandal, elevating it to the highest levels of congressional action and putting the mendacious IRS flacks covering for Obama in an even more desperate situation – compounding lies already told to a House committee with new and flimsier lies told to a joint committee of House and Senate members.

Congressional Democrats on that committee who continue to parrot the transparent lies of IRS officials at some point become complicit in the cover-up of criminal misconduct – not in the legal sense, exactly, but certainly in the political sense. Individual members might lose re-election or might find themselves discounted for any higher positions in government if they are seen as toadies for these Obama crooks. Yet once Democrats begin to join in the chorus of Republicans in demanding real answers and agreeing that there is real wrongdoing, the whole defense of this investigation being a partisan witch hunt vanishes.

The leftist establishment media, by continuing to ignore the scandal and downplay the significance of this investigation, risks the last little fig leaf of notional journalistic competence and integrity. Their utter obliviousness to fetid swamps of official misconduct could become the “real story” as this scandal unfolds. Treating federal judges with contempt is also dangerous, because these judges have tools to force compliance that work.


The real threat, however, comes from the knowledge that an incoming Republican administration in two years will be able to really investigate the cover-up and open up all the files currently kept from Congress and the courts. There will, at that point, be absolutely nothing to protect those officials who have played “kick the can” on the theory that the public will forget about all this. Federal prosecutors can then seek indictments of officials who have obstructed congressional investigations or obstructed justice.

Although some conservatives may fear a blanket presidential pardon to all those involved, after the November 2016 election, of course, this will not make the scandal go away. It may, in fact, make the scandal even more transparent. There would, at that point, be no privilege against self-incrimination that any of the guilty officials could use to hide the truth. All those involved could be ordered to answer questions, put in jail if they refused, and convicted of perjury if they lied under oath (any pardon could not address future crimes like perjury).

These bad actors could also be sued in civil actions – no presidential pardon can protect against private lawsuits – and as more of the ugly mess oozes out, the seriousness of the civil wrongdoing will become clearer. Big money judgments could be awarded against these thugs who bully citizens, and no one will have much sympathy for them. As the extent of the scandal grows, there will be increasing pressure for bar associations to disbar all the attorneys, like Lois Lerner, who were up to their necks in the muck of this scandal.

All of these realities will make it increasingly likely that some of the people now hiding malfeasance and dishonesty by IRS officials and the White House will crack before November 2016, bringing this scandal to center front in the presidential election. The need for putting the White House in Republican hands would then grow dramatically, rather like Watergate provided a strong argument that eight years of Republican presidential power was enough, when that presidential power was proven corrupt.

What makes this scandal worse for Democrats is that it is very easy for ordinary Americans to sink their teeth into: lying government officials, abuse of IRS power, and arrogant persecution of innocent countrymen by political thugs.

The IRS scandal is not going away…oh, boy, is it not going away!



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/artic...#ixzz3LFYBhycr
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved