Think before you Ink

[savak]

I don't mind a small tattoo on the ankle, wrist, or other places that are easy to cover up.

I just don't like it when I see something where it covers a hot chick's entire back, chest, sleeve, upper arm, thigh.

Like the pornstar brooke haven who has most of her arm inked. She looked much better when she first started in porn and had less tattoos.






Its not a deal breaker for me if I see a provider with tattoos covering big portions of her body, but if it was my choice, the tattoos wouldn't be there.

I took a picture of the pornstar claire dames and edited out her tattoo. IMHO, I like the tattoo less version better.

[a10bomb]

Originally Posted by AbbyNicole

I have met several gentleman with no tattoos that are just as sexy!!! (you know who you are!!] ;-)....

So I guess maybe I should go and get this tattoo for the next time I see you!!!

[Doglegg]

I think a tattoo should tell a story and actually be a real work of art.

If all females had tattoos like you see in the magazines, I would spend an hour or so drinking wine or quality rye whiskey while tracing every line and listening to the story(ies).

The Illustrated Man (story and movie) had quite an effect on me as a youngster.

Unfortunately most of the tattoos really aren't that good and the majority of stories start off with "I don't really remember much but it seemed like a good idea at the time."

Very few times have I found a tattoo that enhanced a female's natural beauty.

Dogg

[AbbyNicole]

Originally Posted by a10bomb

So I guess maybe I should go and get this tattoo for the next time I see you!!!

No!!!! I'm sure I can leave a mark MUCH BETTER than ANY tattoo you could imagine!!!

[Sickpuppy]

This has been a lesson in tolerance. I never said I couldn't tolerate tattoos, I just stated my preference. Cudos to San Antonio. I posted the same post in the national forum and generally got hammered - just shows we're more thoughtful around here!

[AbigailFox]

I have some amazing tattoos....like the ones in magazines. However, I think very few ladies can pull of a chest tattoo....stomach and butt are two other areas I will never cover with ink. if you pick your artist well, the work is simply incredible.

[NikkiWhite]

Originally Posted by savak

I don't mind a small tattoo on the ankle, wrist, or other places that are easy to cover up.

I just don't like it when I see something where it covers a hot chick's entire back, chest, sleeve, upper arm, thigh.

Like the pornstar brooke haven who has most of her arm inked. She looked much better when she first started in porn and had less tattoos.






Its not a deal breaker for me if I see a provider with tattoos covering big portions of her body, but if it was my choice, the tattoos wouldn't be there.

I took a picture of the pornstar claire dames and edited out her tattoo. IMHO, I like the tattoo less version better.

Well duh the placement of that tattoo is horrible she highlighted the least attractive part of her body. I dunno why women pick the most unforgiving body parts lol.

[KlassyKelliAnn]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

Your friends say it’s attractive and cool, but…….. Imagine your grandkids asking their Mom/Dad: “Why does grandma have…eyeballs printed on her breasts?; barbed wire around her ankle?; some guy’s name that’s not grandpa on her neck? Imagine your sister’s or brother’s kid’s asking them: “Why does Aunt Jane always wear long sleeves?” Imagine your kid(s) asking you: “Why don’t the other mothers in my (high school) graduating class have tattoos, I thought you said it was common when you were young?”

Now, I’m going to take a lot of flak for this from all the “hobbyists” that will defend your right and/or accuse me of just being old school and try to run me off the board defending their ATF, etc. But, if you can get access, read the ROS’s of as many reviews as you can find and you’ll get the true picture, usually with no BS. I have yet to find one review that says – “go see this girl, she’s got great tattoos”. What you will see, included in the vast majority of reviews – “a few tats, but nothing too distracting” – does that sound like a compliment?

Body ink does not make you (or Angelina) more attractive, it’s a distraction from your real beauty. If this post stops one beautiful woman from turning herself into a billboard, it was worth all the crap I’m going to take for voicing my opinion.

Very nicely stated.

KKA

[Guest032716]

One of the sexiest woman I have ever known! I find good tattoos to be quite sexy - on the right body.

[Guest101114]

I have tattoos but I'm not afraid to admit I wish I had never gotten them... I'm too scared to get them removed though... I don't think it would ever look "natural" anyway... At least they are easily concealed when needed.

I prefer a man/woman with no ink but I have seen some ladies and guys that have really great quality, tasteful body art and they look really good on them and fit their personalities.

[wheels69]

Originally Posted by Rossboss

Tats are great ways to quickly identify the socially or mentally impaired, without having to ask any questions.

Sleeves = moron
Neck, face = life imprisonment, murderer

Thats how I see it

[Guest061815-1]

A new and over-the-top example:

http://sanantonio.backpage.com/Femal...al-21/11263545

[Bush Pilot]

Originally Posted by Louigi

One of the sexiest woman I have ever known! I find good tattoos to be quite sexy - on the right body.

I find them hideous.

[Guest070316-1]

Inkedandsexy.com

One of the best sites ever!