Wave Alert: House Democrats Setting Fundraising Records

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by garhkal

WE've seen dems outspend republicans many a time. DOESN'T mean they will win..

[Yssup Rider]

We’ll see, won’t we?

Prepare your analysis.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

do you have more current numbers for 2018? haven't been able to find it other than the DNC & RNC numbers.


this much I do know. RNC is loaded with cash, DNC, not so much.


it strange to see such imbalance in contributions between the party organization and the individual candidates.

[LakeCityGuy]

Every last Dem challenger candidate to be congresscritter seems to slip up and exposed that they are far left and have wholey embraced the hot but clueless Alexandria chicks views. Meanwhile the economy is rocking and rolling while the black demographic is now 1/3 GOP way. The special elections where GOP has teetered were with lackluster campaign strategy and not embracing Trump.

One thing that I've noticed, over the past decade, is that nationalizing fundraising for congressional candidates is there is little financial support from locals who actually have a say with their vote. I prefer to read FEC filings rather than follow what media says. The information provided is much more telling. This is the case for any candidate not just Dems.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

RNC is loaded with cash, DNC, not so much.

DNC has to pay debt AND support new faces.

It's not how much the DNC raises. It's what they spend it on.

[Guest050619-1]

[QUOTE=LakeCityGuy;1060828527]Every last Dem challenger ...exposed that they are far left and have wholey embraced the hot but clueless Alexandria chicks views. QUOTE]


Clueless.....absolutely!

Hot....? Meh....

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by LakeCityGuy

Every last Dem challenger candidate to be congresscritter seems to slip up and exposed that they are far left and have wholey embraced the hot but clueless Alexandria chicks views. Meanwhile the economy is rocking and rolling while the black demographic is now 1/3 GOP way. The special elections where GOP has teetered were with lackluster campaign strategy and not embracing Trump.

One thing that I've noticed, over the past decade, is that nationalizing fundraising for congressional candidates is there is little financial support from locals who actually have a say with their vote. I prefer to read FEC filings rather than follow what media says. The information provided is much more telling. This is the case for any candidate not just Dems.

According to most, the poll that showed black support at 1/3 favorable is badly flawed. So take it for what it's worth.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/18/polit...ers/index.html

Yes, if voters vote solely on the economy then the GOP will do well. They won't in my opinion do that. Too many negatives.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

According to most, ....
Yes, if voters vote solely on the economy then the GOP will do well. They won't in my opinion do that. Too many negatives.

Really, now ....

10-20-2016, 08:03 AM #21
SpeedRacerXXX


This election is OVER. Republicans should start focusing on 2020. Unless a bomb hits between now and November 8th there is no way Trump can overcome the lead that Clinton has in the polls. For those of you who are still not believing the polls . . . we'll see in a handful of days how accurate they are.

The Political Forum
Does no one care about wikileaks?

What else would CNN report? Those geniuses agreed with you in 2016.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Really, now ....



What else would CNN report? Those geniuses agreed with you in 2016.

I am willing to go out on a limb and make predictions on the 2018 November elections. How about you? It's so easy to sit on the sidelines during the game and then criticize others for errors.

Republicans maintain House margin or increase it -- Probability 0%

Democrats pick up double digit House seats but not enough to take control -- Probability 20%

Democrats take control of the House by a small margin -- probability 60%

Democrats take control of the House by picking up at least 50 seats -- probability 20%

BTW, I went back to the thread you cited where I made my incorrect prediction. I can't find anywhere in the thread where you said Trump would win. You didn't even post in the thread. I am not going to go through all the threads prior to election day 2016 but maybe you can cite the thread and your post where you said Trump would win. Not doubting you supported Trump but did you go out on a limb and state he would win?