Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny
I scanned your transcript and don’t remember Bobulinski describing any substantive business he discussed with Joe Biden. Including corporate governance Bambino. I think he did ask Bobulinski to watch over his fucked up brother and his fucked up son. If I’m wrong please correct me.
And Biden is half senile. When you say he lied about the meeting what does that mean? He didn’t remember?
|
Tiny, are you un-aware of the many, many times Joe Biden told us that he had no knowledge of his sons business deals and never met any of Hunters business partners?
This is only a single instance, there are many others, that Joe lied. Joe said the laptop wasn't Hunters. He lied. Joe said this is nothing more than Russian dis-information. The NYTimes and Washington Post has now confirmed that it was Hunter writing those e-mails and not Putin. Joe lied. And they just told us he lied and that's not a big deal?
Now, does any of that mean Joe did something illegal pertaining to that meeting that Bobulinski described? No, it does not UNLESS you want to include the MOUNTAIN of other evidence that supports what we do know about what happened in that meeting.
You and 1PerryMason1, seem to be taking the stance that as long as Joe Biden didn't say anything about a Chinese business deal and only asked Bobulinski to watch over his idiot brother and crack head son, there was nothing to cause Joe any trouble.
But you don't want to ask any more questions like "why did Joe go to that meeting"? There had to be a reason and I and millions of other people believe exactly what Bobulinski said, it was so that Joe who had final approval over all Hunter's deals, could vet the man that Hunter wanted to put in charge of the Chinese "pay to play" deal.
But I'm certainly open to a different story. Why would Joe Biden want to meet Bobulinski? You think that question isn't being asked by the Grand Jury now in session in the matter of Hunter Biden and this laptop?
Someone leaked from the Grand Jury that the question has been asked, "who is the big guy"? Why the leak didn't include an answer is a bummer but still, that question is central to blowing up the life of Joe Biden. If the Times and Post after hearing all the evidence presented to the grand jury conclude that indeed, Joe Biden was the big guy and had full knowledge of everything Hunter was doing and even flew Hunter to China with him on Air Force 2 to consummate a Chinese deal, Joe is done.
I think Joe is a dead man walking.
You also don't want to go there for some reason when the answer to that question could very well prove intent to corrupt. If in fact Joe Biden is proven in direct testimony by one of the other people in that room or anybody for that matter having dealt with Hunter and the grand jury believes it further proof not withstanding, it's over for Joe. How could he possibly survive that "hold back 10 for the Big guy".
I guess you are telling the truth about not following this story all that close because it seems that you are unaware of all the things Hunter says in those e-mails. Have you really never heard any of them? You didn't hear Hunter telling his sister to "just be thankful you haven't had to give dad half your salary for 30 years"? If true, did Joe report that money? The money Hunter says he gave his dad to make home improvements? YES, I know that each and every one of those things seems "circumstantial", but lot's and lots of circumstantial evidence has sunk more than one person.
And yes, the legal and the non-legal issues do get mixed up in all these discussions but a President doesn't necessarily have to have committed a crime to him impeach him. Joe Biden lying about not knowing what his son was doing, will sink him in my opinion.
