The lid is going to blow off the 2020 election in Georgia!

[TechPapi]

Best quote I've seen lately on this subject. It's sad to see so many fucking rubes, but I suppose we've gotten used to it by now.

Ossoff: "Among today's false prophets are the election deniers who indulge this president's obsession with overturning the 2020 election. Hear me when I say this -- they tell a lie so absurd, and therefore so debasing, that the act of telling it proves the teller's total and humiliating submission."

https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3meyktjscf22w

[bambino]

Another IT expert has come forward with damning evidence that blows the lid off the 2020 election fraud claims.

After accessing a forensic image of the Dominion Election Management System in Mesa County, Colorado, he demonstrated how votes for Donald Trump were switched to Joe Biden in seconds simply by altering the index number - leaving no trace behind.

The analysis is staggering: Dominion allegedly deleted 2.7 million Trump votes nationwide, with 221,000 Pennsylvania votes switched from Trump to Biden, 941,000 Trump votes deleted, and 435,000 votes switched in Dominion-using states overall.

This is the kind of hard proof patriots have demanded for years - now it's time to free Tina Peters immediately and pursue full accountability for what looks like outright treason against the American people.

#breaking #ElectionIntegrity #FreeTinaPeters

[bambino]

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon announces she has launched lawsuits against 25 states and DC for refusing to clean their voter rolls

Think about this for a second, now why would 25 states refuse to clean their voter rolls….

The states are

California
Michigan
Minnesota
New York
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania
Maine
Oregon
Colorado
Hawaii
Massachusetts
Nevada
Delaware
Maryland
New Mexico
Rhode Island
Vermont
Washington
Illinois
Wisconsin
Georgia
Arizona
Connecticut
Virginia
District of Columbia

Our elections are rigged.

[jayzee43]

Absolute lunacy

[TechPapi]

Yep. Complete and utter tinfoil hat bullshit.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by bambino

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon announces she has launched lawsuits against 25 states and DC for refusing to clean their voter rolls

Think about this for a second, now why would 25 states refuse to clean their voter rolls….

The states are

California
Michigan
Minnesota
New York
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania
Maine
Oregon
Colorado
Hawaii
Massachusetts
Nevada
Delaware
Maryland
New Mexico
Rhode Island
Vermont
Washington
Illinois
Wisconsin
Georgia
Arizona
Connecticut
Virginia
District of Columbia

Our elections are rigged.

... CLEAN the Voting Rolls! ...

#### Salty

[txdot-guy]

Here’s a good article about the lawsuit and the legal issues surrounding it. It’s quite long and in depth.


https://statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu/...r-information/

From the article:

The Justice Department claims it needs complete voter registration lists to determine whether states are complying with their obligations under federal law to make “reasonable efforts” to maintain accurate voter rolls, but legal experts and state officials have questioned this purported rationale. Media reports have indicated that the Justice Department has been sharing voter data with the Department of Homeland Security, potentially to run citizenship checks. The Justice Department and DHS have offered divergent statements about whether such data sharing is occurring, prompting state election officials to demand more clarity. Some observers have suggested that the Trump administration is attempting to create a national voter registration database, sparking privacy concerns. And many worry that these federal-level activities—which are largely spearheaded by individuals who participated in President Trump’s ill-fated efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 election—are part of a larger effort to sow distrust in the elections system ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Whatever the Justice Department’s purpose, states have mostly declined to provide their full, unredacted voter registration lists, citing their privacy laws and instead offering publicly available versions that do not include more sensitive information. Indeed, of the more than 40 states known to have received such demands, as of the date of publication, the Justice Department has indicated that only 10 states—including Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Wyoming—have either provided their full voter registration lists or indicated they plan to do so.

Faced with this widespread pushback, the Justice Department has escalated the dispute, filing lawsuits in federal court against 24 states (so far)—Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin—plus D.C. in an effort to compel the states to turn over their complete voter registration lists. The Justice Department is also pursuing a similar case against Orange County, California, and Trump administration allies at the Republican National Committee have filed lawsuits under state public records laws against Hawaii and New Jersey, similarly seeking copies of the states’ voter registration data that they have been denied to date.

These standoffs implicate the long-established authority of states to administer elections and raise fundamental questions about the scope of the federal government’s role in the voter registration process. This explainer examines these issues. Part I provides background on voter registration in the United States, explaining how states are largely responsible for administering voter registration for federal elections, subject to certain federal requirements. Part II explores states’ obligations to protect the privacy of their citizens’ voter registration data. Part III discusses the key legal questions now reaching the courts: What information does federal voting law require states to disclose to the Justice Department? To what extent can states redact sensitive information like Social Security numbers and driver’s license numbers? And what limits exist on federal authority to access such information? Finally, Part IV examines potential legal options that citizens may have to protect their sensitive information when their states may be more willing to comply with federal demands.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by jayzee43

Absolute lunacy

Yep. It is absolute lunacy for any state NOT to update its voter registration rolls regularly to remove anyone who has died, moved out of state, been convicted of a felony, or is not a US citizen.

Nice to agree with you once in a while, jayzee!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Media reports have indicated that the Justice Department has been sharing voter data with the Department of Homeland Security, potentially to run citizenship checks.

Great! That's fine with me. In fact, it's exactly what needs to happen.

If anyone has privacy concerns, then let's do this: appoint a non-partisan 3rd party to receive each state's voter database, run it against all DHS databases, then return it to each state with a list of non-citizens that should be immediately purged from the voter rolls.

There is absolutely no valid reason NOT to do this.

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Great! That's fine with me. In fact, it's exactly what needs to happen.

If anyone has privacy concerns, then let's do this: appoint a non-partisan 3rd party to receive each state's voter database, run it against all DHS databases, then return it to each state with a list of non-citizens that should be immediately purged from the voter rolls.

There is absolutely no valid reason NOT to do this.

Well, except for the mistakes that could disenfranchise voters who ARE eligible to vote. Ain't worth using if it ain't right

https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/a...kes-confusion/

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Well, except for the mistakes that could disenfranchise voters who ARE eligible to vote. Ain't worth using if it ain't right

https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/a...kes-confusion/

Sorta like when GOP members were simply able to accuse a voter or group of voters- of not being eligible to vote and that person was purged from voting record eligibility. The Great Purge of 225,000 NC voters comes to mind.

If every eligible voter actually voted in the elections- no Republican would ever be elected again.

[jayzee43]

Originally Posted by eyecu2

Sorta like when GOP members were simply able to accuse a voter or group of voters- of not being eligible to vote and that person was purged from voting record eligibility. The Great Purge of 225,000 NC voters comes to mind.

If every eligible voter actually voted in the elections- no Republican would ever be elected again.

Exactly. The American electoral system is so fucked up, and not at all representative of what people actually want. MAGA says elections are rigged. I say the entire system is rigged.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Well, except for the mistakes that could disenfranchise voters who ARE eligible to vote. Ain't worth using if it ain't right

https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/a...kes-confusion/

Don't be ridiculous. You're looking for ANY lame excuse not to do the right thing!

I said let's put a non-partisan 3rd party in charge of the process. Anyone who thinks he/she is being disenfranchised in error will have the opportunity to show up with proof of citizenship and be kept on the voter rolls.

Just because voter registration clean-up efforts are not guaranteed to be 100% perfect is NOT a reason to avoid them altogether!

As Spike Lee would say - "Do the Right Thing!"

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Don't be ridiculous. You're looking for ANY lame excuse not to do the right thing!

I said let's put a non-partisan 3rd party in charge of the process. Anyone who thinks he/she is being disenfranchised in error will have the opportunity to show up with proof of citizenship and be kept on the voter rolls.

Just because voter registration clean-up efforts are not guaranteed to be 100% perfect is NOT a reason to avoid them altogether!

As Spike Lee would say - "Do the Right Thing!"

The right thing would be not disenfranchising legal voters chasing a statistical anomaly when you don't have your own shit together.

Thanks, though

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Well, except for the mistakes that could disenfranchise voters who ARE eligible to vote. Ain't worth using if it ain't right

https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/a...kes-confusion/

You might also want to do some research on who exactly failed to keep the DHS databases complete, accurate and up to date.

Here's what my AI research assistant informed me. It takes time to clean up all of the Biden/Harris immigration fuck-ups!!


"Under the Biden administration, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) experienced significant, widespread lapses in tracking, record-keeping, and filing of immigrant data.

Lost Tracking of Immigrants and Children

Missing Unaccompanied Minors: A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) report indicated that as of May 2024, the government lost track of over 320,000 migrant children, including over 291,000 who were not issued Notices to Appear in court and 32,000 who failed to appear for hearings.

Missing Addresses: Investigations found that for more than 25,000 migrants released from custody, no address was recorded in their files, making them impossible to track.

Unvetted Sponsors: The HHS/DHS failed to adequately track unaccompanied children, with reports stating that in some cases, children were placed with unvetted sponsors.

Loss of Data and Filing Failures

Court Cases Dismissed: Due to a failure by DHS to file "Notice to Appear" (NTA) paperwork, nearly 200,000 deportation cases were dismissed by immigration judges.

Parole Tracking Failures: A July 2025 OIG report confirmed that DHS failed to monitor or enforce parole expiration for over 61,000 parolees.

Withdrawal of Data Collection: The Biden administration withdrew a Trump-era plan that would have expanded the collection of biometric data (such as DNA, face prints, and iris scans) from immigrants."