Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163231
Yssup Rider60955
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48654
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42591
CryptKicker37218
The_Waco_Kid37009
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-10-2021, 06:02 PM   #181
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
oeb11
This message is hidden because oeb11 is on your ignore list.

In case you forgot. I truly couldn’t care less what you type.

I am not on ignore - the curiosity is unquenchable in DPSTs.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 08-10-2021, 06:11 PM   #182
pfunkdenver
Valued Poster
 
pfunkdenver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 13, 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,853
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11 View Post
I am not on ignore - the curiosity is unquenchable in DPSTs.
Uhhh...yes...you are! LOL!
pfunkdenver is offline   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 07:48 AM   #183
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 07:49 AM   #184
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,200
Encounters: 36
Default

Back to the OP question... We aren't. We're meant to default and thus usher in a brave new world of socialism where we will all own nothing and be happy. if we know what's good for us.
texassapper is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 01:50 PM   #185
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,900
Encounters: 2
Default

Here's the Senate budget resolution, passed today through a 50-49 partisan vote:

https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo...c/HEN21B52.pdf

It calls for the federal deficit to go from 1.3 trillion in 2022 to 1.8 trillion in 2031. That's 6% of the current GDP in 2022, and 8% in 2031. Despite being 92 pages in length, it's very sketchy on details, with nothing about changes in the tax regime beyond devoting lots more resources to the IRS.

Manchin and Sinema have said they believe the $3.5 trillion additional spending that's being proposed is excessive. Hopefully they'll stick to that when it comes time for the next vote in the Senate.
Tiny is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 02:26 PM   #186
HedonistForever
Valued Poster
 
HedonistForever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 31, 2019
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 5,667
Default

Unfortunately, I predict things will not get better, till they get much worse at which time I WILL tell you "told you so".
HedonistForever is offline   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 02:32 PM   #187
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,900
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HedonistForever View Post
Unfortunately, I predict things will not get better, till they get much worse at which time I WILL tell you "told you so".
I hope you're wrong. I fear you may be right.
Tiny is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 03:44 PM   #188
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,049
Encounters: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Here's the Senate budget resolution, passed today through a 50-49 partisan vote:

https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo...c/HEN21B52.pdf

It calls for the federal deficit to go from 1.3 trillion in 2022 to 1.8 trillion in 2031. That's 6% of the current GDP in 2022, and 8% in 2031. Despite being 92 pages in length, it's very sketchy on details, with nothing about changes in the tax regime beyond devoting lots more resources to the IRS.

Manchin and Sinema have said they believe the $3.5 trillion additional spending that's being proposed is excessive. Hopefully they'll stick to that when it comes time for the next vote in the Senate.
3.5 won’t pass. I’m thinking somewhere along the 2T mark will get passed from the senate to the house. The question will be will the house blow it all up or just eat the smaller amount. They have to consider that they’ll likely only get one shot and will need to pass this before year end to use the budget rules. And they gotta have people seeing the results of the money in real life to make it palatable.
1blackman1 is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 06:06 PM   #189
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,900
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
3.5 won’t pass. I’m thinking somewhere along the 2T mark will get passed from the senate to the house. The question will be will the house blow it all up or just eat the smaller amount. They have to consider that they’ll likely only get one shot and will need to pass this before year end to use the budget rules. And they gotta have people seeing the results of the money in real life to make it palatable.
That would be my guess, $2 trillion too, still a huge amount of money. It depends on whether the moderate Democrats succumb to peer pressure.

It will be interesting to see how this will play out in the House. As you know, the Progressives are saying they won't pass the infrastructure bill unless the Senate passes the reconciliation bill first, and Pelosi is backing them up. Democratic moderates on the other hand, some of whom might prefer to pass the infrastructure bill but not the reconciliation bill, aren't all happy with $3.5 trillion. And then you've got a group of Democratic representatives who want to lower tax rates on upper income tax payers by removing or increasing caps on deductibility of state income taxes. They say they won't vote for the bill unless they get that. There's the potential for a knock down, drag out fight among the Democrats.
Tiny is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 06:54 PM   #190
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,049
Encounters: 41
Default

I don't there will be ny real fight. the progressives can only muck up the work, but they don't have any real power. eventually they will cave to a lower number. Now changes to the tax code, particularly the corp tax rate and state income tax deduction actually makes sense in the long run. the republicans knew that would never make it once the dems got power, they just needed it as a pay for in their bill to get it through the CBO analysis.
1blackman1 is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 08:21 PM   #191
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,900
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
I don't there will be ny real fight. the progressives can only muck up the work, but they don't have any real power. eventually they will cave to a lower number. Now changes to the tax code, particularly the corp tax rate and state income tax deduction actually makes sense in the long run. the republicans knew that would never make it once the dems got power, they just needed it as a pay for in their bill to get it through the CBO analysis.
What do you think will happen with capital gains taxes? Biden's proposals would result in the U.S. having the highest capital gains tax in the developed world,

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/21/bide...-in-world.html

I've read, in unbiased sources, that the CBO historically has considered 28% to be rate at which government revenues are maximized from the capital gains tax. Raise it higher and enough people hang onto assets instead of selling, so that tax revenues actually fall. Which is not a good thing IMHO, as it hinders efficient allocation of capital.

Manchin has thrown out 28% as being a reasonable level for the capital gains tax. That's probably before the 3.8% net investment income tax and state income taxes. Warner and Tester believe Biden's proposed rate is too high too.

I'd think that Congress would have enough sense not pass a tax increase that would actually reduce government revenues. The kicker though is that Biden has also proposed to eliminate stepped up cost basis when taxpayers die. Instead, when someone dies, his estate would have to pay a capital gains tax on his property. This probably would result in Biden's capital gains tax changes raising some nominal amount of additional revenues. People won't be as motivated to hang onto assets until they die, to avoid the capital gains tax, if they have to pay it after they're dead, so to speak.

However, would it be fair? In addition to the capital gains tax, larger estates would also have to pay an estate tax of 40%. If you had very little cost basis in a business or investments, because you bought them many years ago, your estate would potentially be looking at having to fork over 80% to the government. This definitely won't fly with Tester, the Democratic Montana Senator and farmer, who would be exactly in this position personally when he passes away. But he and other farm state members may try to get an exemption for farms and ranches, instead of voting against the bill.

We're in for an interesting few months.
Tiny is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 09:09 PM   #192
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,049
Encounters: 41
Default

they may find a way to increase it as well, but I am not sure what a good level will be. 28% sounds fair enough. but I can say I am not familiar enough with that to know.

no one pays 80% or even anything close so you should stop spouting those crazy numbers Norquist keeps putting out.
1blackman1 is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 09:20 PM   #193
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,900
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
they may find a way to increase it as well, but I am not sure what a good level will be. 28% sounds fair enough. but I can say I am not familiar enough with that to know.

no one pays 80% or even anything close so you should stop spouting those crazy numbers Norquist keeps putting out.
That's not from Norquist, it's from Biden's Green Book. The combination of the elimination of the Trump tax cuts on upper income taxpayers and taxing capital gains as ordinary income boosts the capital gains tax rate to 43.4%.

The estate tax is 40% and it's not on the capital gain, but rather on the value of the estate.

Add them together and assume the taxpayer has a low cost basis, maybe because he started a business or bought a farm or stock 30 years ago, and you can get to 80%.

One caveat, I don't know if they'd deduct the capital gains tax before calculating the estate tax, in which case the government would "only" be taking around 65% of the value of the estate.
Tiny is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 09:37 PM   #194
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,049
Encounters: 41
Default

Ok. I’m not familiar enough to know how that works. We have a CPA and since I don’t come from money, there’s no inherited wealth or “death tax” I have to be concerned about. Now my daughter may have some issues but I am confident I’ll have an answer for that by the time my death is an issue (at least a trust of some sort to structure taxes).
1blackman1 is online now   Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 09:51 PM   #195
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,900
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
Ok. I’m not familiar enough to know how that works. We have a CPA and since I don’t come from money, there’s no inherited wealth or “death tax” I have to be concerned about. Now my daughter may have some issues but I am confident I’ll have an answer for that by the time my death is an issue (at least a trust of some sort to structure taxes).
Right now there's a lifetime exemption from estate and gift tax of $11.7 million. Biden campaigned on lowering it to $3.5 million but hasn't followed through. You've got a lot of wealthy Senators out there who probably don't want to see the exemption cut. But yes, if you find that your exemption isn't high enough, there are potentially ways out of paying the tax. Unfortunately that's the way the politicians work -- raise the headline rates sky high (40% for the estate tax), but then put in loopholes so those who can afford high priced attorneys and accountants can get out of paying the tax. It's not an efficient way to tax people.

The proposed capital gains tax on estates though would kick in at a much lower level, $1 million I think. And would be 43.4% of the value of the estate at death less your cost basis in the assets.
Tiny is online now   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved